From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Timothy Bird <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/18] kunit: test: add kunit_stream a std::stream like logger
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:41:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44bovSiiqGCip1Q4zBOUauXMcryxnPs8miOa0-QrPW61Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g47tk8x5iet=xfPVO6MphD3SsLtYQLrCi5O2h0bvdXwHtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:14 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-01 11:59:57)
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > To be honest I do not fully understand KUnit design. I am not
> > > > > completely sure how the tested code is isolated from the running
> > > > > system. Namely, I do not know if the tested code shares
> > > > > the same locks with the system running the test.
> > > >
> > > > No worries, I don't expect printk to be the hang up in those cases. It
> > > > sounds like KUnit has a long way to evolve before printk is going to
> > > > be a limitation.
> > >
> > > So Stephen, what do you think?
> > >
> > > Do you want me to go forward with the new kunit_assert API wrapping
> > > the string_stream as I have it now? Would you prefer to punt this to a
> > > later patch? Or would you prefer something else?
> > >
> >
> > I like the struct based approach. If anything, it can be adjusted to
> > make the code throw some records into a spinlock later on and delay the
> > formatting of the assertion if need be.
>
> That's a fair point.
>
> > Can you resend with that
> > approach? I don't think I'll have any more comments after that.
I sent a new revision, v12, that incorporates the kunit_assert stuff.
Let me know what you think!
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Timothy Bird <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/18] kunit: test: add kunit_stream a std::stream like logger
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:41:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44bovSiiqGCip1Q4zBOUauXMcryxnPs8miOa0-QrPW61Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g47tk8x5iet=xfPVO6MphD3SsLtYQLrCi5O2h0bvdXwHtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:14 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-01 11:59:57)
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > To be honest I do not fully understand KUnit design. I am not
> > > > > completely sure how the tested code is isolated from the running
> > > > > system. Namely, I do not know if the tested code shares
> > > > > the same locks with the system running the test.
> > > >
> > > > No worries, I don't expect printk to be the hang up in those cases. It
> > > > sounds like KUnit has a long way to evolve before printk is going to
> > > > be a limitation.
> > >
> > > So Stephen, what do you think?
> > >
> > > Do you want me to go forward with the new kunit_assert API wrapping
> > > the string_stream as I have it now? Would you prefer to punt this to a
> > > later patch? Or would you prefer something else?
> > >
> >
> > I like the struct based approach. If anything, it can be adjusted to
> > make the code throw some records into a spinlock later on and delay the
> > formatting of the assertion if need be.
>
> That's a fair point.
>
> > Can you resend with that
> > approach? I don't think I'll have any more comments after that.
I sent a new revision, v12, that incorporates the kunit_assert stuff.
Let me know what you think!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <ju>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/18] kunit: test: add kunit_stream a std::stream like logger
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:41:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44bovSiiqGCip1Q4zBOUauXMcryxnPs8miOa0-QrPW61Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g47tk8x5iet=xfPVO6MphD3SsLtYQLrCi5O2h0bvdXwHtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:14 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-01 11:59:57)
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > To be honest I do not fully understand KUnit design. I am not
> > > > > completely sure how the tested code is isolated from the running
> > > > > system. Namely, I do not know if the tested code shares
> > > > > the same locks with the system running the test.
> > > >
> > > > No worries, I don't expect printk to be the hang up in those cases. It
> > > > sounds like KUnit has a long way to evolve before printk is going to
> > > > be a limitation.
> > >
> > > So Stephen, what do you think?
> > >
> > > Do you want me to go forward with the new kunit_assert API wrapping
> > > the string_stream as I have it now? Would you prefer to punt this to a
> > > later patch? Or would you prefer something else?
> > >
> >
> > I like the struct based approach. If anything, it can be adjusted to
> > make the code throw some records into a spinlock later on and delay the
> > formatting of the assertion if need be.
>
> That's a fair point.
>
> > Can you resend with that
> > approach? I don't think I'll have any more comments after that.
I sent a new revision, v12, that incorporates the kunit_assert stuff.
Let me know what you think!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Timothy Bird <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/18] kunit: test: add kunit_stream a std::stream like logger
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:41:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44bovSiiqGCip1Q4zBOUauXMcryxnPs8miOa0-QrPW61Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g47tk8x5iet=xfPVO6MphD3SsLtYQLrCi5O2h0bvdXwHtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:14 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-01 11:59:57)
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > To be honest I do not fully understand KUnit design. I am not
> > > > > completely sure how the tested code is isolated from the running
> > > > > system. Namely, I do not know if the tested code shares
> > > > > the same locks with the system running the test.
> > > >
> > > > No worries, I don't expect printk to be the hang up in those cases. It
> > > > sounds like KUnit has a long way to evolve before printk is going to
> > > > be a limitation.
> > >
> > > So Stephen, what do you think?
> > >
> > > Do you want me to go forward with the new kunit_assert API wrapping
> > > the string_stream as I have it now? Would you prefer to punt this to a
> > > later patch? Or would you prefer something else?
> > >
> >
> > I like the struct based approach. If anything, it can be adjusted to
> > make the code throw some records into a spinlock later on and delay the
> > formatting of the assertion if need be.
>
> That's a fair point.
>
> > Can you resend with that
> > approach? I don't think I'll have any more comments after that.
I sent a new revision, v12, that incorporates the kunit_assert stuff.
Let me know what you think!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Timothy Bird <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/18] kunit: test: add kunit_stream a std::stream like logger
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:41:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44bovSiiqGCip1Q4zBOUauXMcryxnPs8miOa0-QrPW61Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g47tk8x5iet=xfPVO6MphD3SsLtYQLrCi5O2h0bvdXwHtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:14 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-01 11:59:57)
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > To be honest I do not fully understand KUnit design. I am not
> > > > > completely sure how the tested code is isolated from the running
> > > > > system. Namely, I do not know if the tested code shares
> > > > > the same locks with the system running the test.
> > > >
> > > > No worries, I don't expect printk to be the hang up in those cases. It
> > > > sounds like KUnit has a long way to evolve before printk is going to
> > > > be a limitation.
> > >
> > > So Stephen, what do you think?
> > >
> > > Do you want me to go forward with the new kunit_assert API wrapping
> > > the string_stream as I have it now? Would you prefer to punt this to a
> > > later patch? Or would you prefer something else?
> > >
> >
> > I like the struct based approach. If anything, it can be adjusted to
> > make the code throw some records into a spinlock later on and delay the
> > formatting of the assertion if need be.
>
> That's a fair point.
>
> > Can you resend with that
> > approach? I don't think I'll have any more comments after that.
I sent a new revision, v12, that incorporates the kunit_assert stuff.
Let me know what you think!
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-12 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 218+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 8:17 [PATCH v9 00/18] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:11 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] kunit: test: add kunit_stream a std::stream like logger Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 22:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 7:57 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 8:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 15:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-16 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-18 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20190718175024.C3EC421019-+nuXSHJNwjE76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-18 19:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-19 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 18:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 20:03 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20190722200347.261D3218C9-+nuXSHJNwjE76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-22 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20190722235411.06C1320840-+nuXSHJNwjE76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-23 0:32 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-24 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-25 20:21 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-07-26 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:55 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <CAFd5g46iAhDZ5C_chi7oYLVOkwcoj6+0nw+kPWuXhqWwWKd9jA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 18:59 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <CAFd5g473iFfvBnJs2pcwuJYgY+DpgD6RLzyDFL1otUuScgKUag-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-01 21:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins [this message]
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 20:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-02 7:37 ` John Ogness
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-08-12 21:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] kunit: test: add the concept of assertions Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <20190712081744.87097-1-brendanhiggins-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-15 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] kunit: test: add the concept of expectations Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] kbuild: enable building KUnit Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
[not found] ` <20190712081744.87097-7-brendanhiggins-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-15 20:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] kunit: test: add initial tests Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] kunit: test: add support for test abort Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] kunit: defconfig: add defconfigs for building " Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec() Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] MAINTAINERS: add proc sysctl KUnit test to PROC SYSCTL section Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-07-12 8:17 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFd5g44bovSiiqGCip1Q4zBOUauXMcryxnPs8miOa0-QrPW61Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=knut.omang@oracle.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.