All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	lukasz.luba@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	pkondeti@codeaurora.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:21:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200306112134.GD2503422@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305090627.31908-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>

Hi Ionela,

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:06:20AM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> v5 -> v6
>  - v5 can be found at [7]
>  - The current series is based on arm64/master [8].

arm64/master is just some random point in the Linus tree, I didn't
realise people are using it. I moved it to v5.6-rc3 as that's the base
for the final arm64 for-next/core.

>  - [1/7] kernel parameter removed as Catalin recommended
>  - [2/7, 4/7] changelog and documentation changed to remove information
>    about the removed kernel parameter
>  - [2/7, 3/7, 6/7] collected reviewed-by and acked-by from James,
>    Marc and Lukasz.

The series looks fine. Once Sudeep reviews/acks the arch topology patch,
I'll queue the patches.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	pkondeti@codeaurora.org, maz@kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:21:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200306112134.GD2503422@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305090627.31908-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>

Hi Ionela,

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:06:20AM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> v5 -> v6
>  - v5 can be found at [7]
>  - The current series is based on arm64/master [8].

arm64/master is just some random point in the Linus tree, I didn't
realise people are using it. I moved it to v5.6-rc3 as that's the base
for the final arm64 for-next/core.

>  - [1/7] kernel parameter removed as Catalin recommended
>  - [2/7, 4/7] changelog and documentation changed to remove information
>    about the removed kernel parameter
>  - [2/7, 3/7, 6/7] collected reviewed-by and acked-by from James,
>    Marc and Lukasz.

The series looks fine. Once Sudeep reviews/acks the arch topology patch,
I'll queue the patches.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05  9:06 [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] arm64: add support for the AMU extension v1 Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] arm64: trap to EL1 accesses to AMU counters from EL0 Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] arm64/kvm: disable access to AMU registers from kvm guests Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] Documentation: arm64: document support for the AMU extension Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] cpufreq: add function to get the hardware max frequency Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] arm64: use activity monitors for frequency invariance Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-06 11:53   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 11:53     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-05  9:06 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: validate arch_timer_rate Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-05  9:06   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-06 11:21 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-03-06 11:21   ` [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Catalin Marinas
2020-03-09 14:11   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-03-09 14:11     ` Ionela Voinescu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200306112134.GD2503422@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.