From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, pkondeti@codeaurora.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:11:01 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200309141101.GA13343@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200306112134.GD2503422@arrakis.emea.arm.com> Hi Catalin, Sudeep, On Friday 06 Mar 2020 at 11:21:34 (+0000), Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Ionela, > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:06:20AM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > > v5 -> v6 > > - v5 can be found at [7] > > - The current series is based on arm64/master [8]. > > arm64/master is just some random point in the Linus tree, I didn't > realise people are using it. I moved it to v5.6-rc3 as that's the base > for the final arm64 for-next/core. > > > - [1/7] kernel parameter removed as Catalin recommended > > - [2/7, 4/7] changelog and documentation changed to remove information > > about the removed kernel parameter > > - [2/7, 3/7, 6/7] collected reviewed-by and acked-by from James, > > Marc and Lukasz. > > The series looks fine. Once Sudeep reviews/acks the arch topology patch, > I'll queue the patches. > Thank you both! Ionela. > Thanks. > > -- > Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, pkondeti@codeaurora.org, maz@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:11:01 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200309141101.GA13343@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200306112134.GD2503422@arrakis.emea.arm.com> Hi Catalin, Sudeep, On Friday 06 Mar 2020 at 11:21:34 (+0000), Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Ionela, > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:06:20AM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > > v5 -> v6 > > - v5 can be found at [7] > > - The current series is based on arm64/master [8]. > > arm64/master is just some random point in the Linus tree, I didn't > realise people are using it. I moved it to v5.6-rc3 as that's the base > for the final arm64 for-next/core. > > > - [1/7] kernel parameter removed as Catalin recommended > > - [2/7, 4/7] changelog and documentation changed to remove information > > about the removed kernel parameter > > - [2/7, 3/7, 6/7] collected reviewed-by and acked-by from James, > > Marc and Lukasz. > > The series looks fine. Once Sudeep reviews/acks the arch topology patch, > I'll queue the patches. > Thank you both! Ionela. > Thanks. > > -- > Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-09 14:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-03-05 9:06 [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] arm64: add support for the AMU extension v1 Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] arm64: trap to EL1 accesses to AMU counters from EL0 Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] arm64/kvm: disable access to AMU registers from kvm guests Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] Documentation: arm64: document support for the AMU extension Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] cpufreq: add function to get the hardware max frequency Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] arm64: use activity monitors for frequency invariance Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-06 11:53 ` Sudeep Holla 2020-03-06 11:53 ` Sudeep Holla 2020-03-05 9:06 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: validate arch_timer_rate Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-05 9:06 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-03-06 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Catalin Marinas 2020-03-06 11:21 ` Catalin Marinas 2020-03-09 14:11 ` Ionela Voinescu [this message] 2020-03-09 14:11 ` Ionela Voinescu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200309141101.GA13343@arm.com \ --to=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \ --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.