All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	David1.Zhou@amd.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] lib/scatterlist: add sg_set_dma_addr() function
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:19:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200312141928.GK31668@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312104729.GA26031@infradead.org>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:47:29AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:31:35AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > But how should we then deal with all the existing interfaces which already
> > take a scatterlist/sg_table ?
> >
> > The whole DMA-buf design and a lot of drivers are build around
> > scatterlist/sg_table and to me that actually makes quite a lot of sense.
> > 
> 
> Replace them with a saner interface that doesn't take a scatterlist.
> At very least for new functionality like peer to peer DMA, but
> especially this code would also benefit from a general move away
> from the scatterlist.

If dma buf can do P2P I'd like to see support for consuming a dmabuf
in RDMA. Looking at how.. there is an existing sgl based path starting
from get_user_pages through dma map to the drivers. (ib_umem)

I can replace the driver part with something else (dma_sg), but not
until we get a way to DMA map pages directly into that something
else..

The non-page scatterlist is also a big concern for RDMA as we have
drivers that want the page list, so even if we did as this series
contemplates I'd have still have to split the drivers and create the
notion of a dma-only SGL.

> > I mean we could come up with a new structure for this, but to me that just
> > looks like reinventing the wheel. Especially since drivers need to be able
> > to handle both I/O to system memory and I/O to PCIe BARs.
> 
> The structure for holding the struct page side of the scatterlist is
> called struct bio_vec, so far mostly used by the block and networking
> code.

I haven't used bio_vecs before, do they support chaining like SGL so
they can be very big? RDMA dma maps gigabytes of memory

> The structure for holding dma addresses doesn't really exist
> in a generic form, but would be an array of these structures:
> 
> struct dma_sg {
> 	dma_addr_t	addr;
> 	u32		len;
> };

Same question, RDMA needs to represent gigabytes of pages in a DMA
list, we will need some generic way to handle that. I suspect GPU has
a similar need? Can it be accomidated in some generic dma_sg?

So I'm guessing the path forward is something like

 - Add some generic dma_sg data structure and helper
 - Add dma mapping code to go from pages to dma_sg
 - Rework RDMA to use dma_sg and the new dma mapping code
 - Rework dmabuf to support dma mapping to a dma_sg
 - Rework GPU drivers to use dma_sg
 - Teach p2pdma to generate a dma_sg from a BAR page list
 - This series

?

Jason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] lib/scatterlist: add sg_set_dma_addr() function
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:19:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200312141928.GK31668@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312104729.GA26031@infradead.org>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:47:29AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:31:35AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > But how should we then deal with all the existing interfaces which already
> > take a scatterlist/sg_table ?
> >
> > The whole DMA-buf design and a lot of drivers are build around
> > scatterlist/sg_table and to me that actually makes quite a lot of sense.
> > 
> 
> Replace them with a saner interface that doesn't take a scatterlist.
> At very least for new functionality like peer to peer DMA, but
> especially this code would also benefit from a general move away
> from the scatterlist.

If dma buf can do P2P I'd like to see support for consuming a dmabuf
in RDMA. Looking at how.. there is an existing sgl based path starting
from get_user_pages through dma map to the drivers. (ib_umem)

I can replace the driver part with something else (dma_sg), but not
until we get a way to DMA map pages directly into that something
else..

The non-page scatterlist is also a big concern for RDMA as we have
drivers that want the page list, so even if we did as this series
contemplates I'd have still have to split the drivers and create the
notion of a dma-only SGL.

> > I mean we could come up with a new structure for this, but to me that just
> > looks like reinventing the wheel. Especially since drivers need to be able
> > to handle both I/O to system memory and I/O to PCIe BARs.
> 
> The structure for holding the struct page side of the scatterlist is
> called struct bio_vec, so far mostly used by the block and networking
> code.

I haven't used bio_vecs before, do they support chaining like SGL so
they can be very big? RDMA dma maps gigabytes of memory

> The structure for holding dma addresses doesn't really exist
> in a generic form, but would be an array of these structures:
> 
> struct dma_sg {
> 	dma_addr_t	addr;
> 	u32		len;
> };

Same question, RDMA needs to represent gigabytes of pages in a DMA
list, we will need some generic way to handle that. I suspect GPU has
a similar need? Can it be accomidated in some generic dma_sg?

So I'm guessing the path forward is something like

 - Add some generic dma_sg data structure and helper
 - Add dma mapping code to go from pages to dma_sg
 - Rework RDMA to use dma_sg and the new dma mapping code
 - Rework dmabuf to support dma mapping to a dma_sg
 - Rework GPU drivers to use dma_sg
 - Teach p2pdma to generate a dma_sg from a BAR page list
 - This series

?

Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-12 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-11 13:51 P2P for DMA-buf Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51 ` Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib/scatterlist: add sg_set_dma_addr() function Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` Christian König
2020-03-11 15:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-11 15:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-12 10:14     ` Christian König
2020-03-12 10:14       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-12 10:14       ` Christian König
2020-03-12 10:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-12 10:19         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-12 10:31         ` Christian König
2020-03-12 10:31           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-12 10:31           ` Christian König
2020-03-12 10:47           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-12 10:47             ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-12 11:02             ` Christian König
2020-03-12 11:02               ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-12 11:02               ` Christian König
2020-03-12 14:19             ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-03-12 14:19               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-12 15:39               ` Christian König
2020-03-12 15:39                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-12 15:39                 ` Christian König
2020-03-12 16:19                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-12 16:19                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-12 16:13               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-03-12 16:13                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Logan Gunthorpe
2020-03-12 16:13                 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-03-13 11:21               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-13 11:21                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-13 12:17                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-13 12:17                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16  8:56                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16  8:56                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16  9:41                     ` Christian König
2020-03-16  9:41                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-16  9:41                       ` Christian König
2020-03-16  9:52                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16  9:52                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 12:37                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 12:37                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-13 13:33                 ` Christian König
2020-03-13 13:33                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-13 13:33                   ` Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: note that we can handle peer2peer DMA-buf Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/amdgpu: add checks if DMA-buf P2P is supported Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` Christian König
2020-03-11 14:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:04     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:33     ` Christian König
2020-03-11 14:33       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 14:33       ` Christian König
2020-03-11 14:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:38         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:43         ` Christian König
2020-03-11 14:43           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 14:43           ` Christian König
2020-03-11 14:48           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:48             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/amdgpu: add support for exporting VRAM using DMA-buf v2 Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` Christian König
2020-03-11 14:33   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:33     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 14:39     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-11 15:08   ` Alex Deucher
2020-03-11 15:08     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2020-03-11 15:08     ` Alex Deucher
2020-03-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/amdgpu: improve amdgpu_gem_info debugfs file Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-03-11 13:51   ` Christian König
2020-03-11 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/6] lib/scatterlist: add sg_set_dma_addr() function Patchwork
2020-03-11 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200312141928.GK31668@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=David1.Zhou@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.