All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com
Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
	b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, nm@ti.com,
	sboyd@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	qperret@google.com, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, khilman@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, steven.price@arm.com,
	tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, orjan.eide@arm.com,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, mka@chromium.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/10] PM / EM: change name of em_pd_energy to em_cpu_energy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:42:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200410084210.24932-7-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410084210.24932-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Energy Model framework supports now other devices than CPUs. Refactor some
of the functions in order to prevent wrong usage. The old function
em_pd_energy has to generic name. It must not be used without proper
cpumask pointer, which is possible only for CPU devices. Thus, rename it
and add proper description to warn of potential wrong usage for other
devices.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/energy_model.h | 11 ++++++++---
 kernel/sched/fair.c          |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index 73c43e4c8a3b..1790199aa24f 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -83,15 +83,20 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
 void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev);
 
 /**
- * em_pd_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a perf. domain
+ * em_cpu_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a
+		performance domain
  * @pd		: performance domain for which energy has to be estimated
  * @max_util	: highest utilization among CPUs of the domain
  * @sum_util	: sum of the utilization of all CPUs in the domain
  *
+ * This function must be used only for CPU devices. There is no validation,
+ * i.e. if the EM is a CPU type and has cpumask allocated. It is called from
+ * the scheduler code quite frequently and that is why there is not checks.
+ *
  * Return: the sum of the energy consumed by the CPUs of the domain assuming
  * a capacity state satisfying the max utilization of the domain.
  */
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 				unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	unsigned long freq, scale_cpu;
@@ -199,7 +204,7 @@ static inline struct em_perf_domain *em_pd_get(struct device *dev)
 static inline void em_pd_put(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 			unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 02f323b85b6d..30f6392f628c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6464,7 +6464,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 		max_util = max(max_util, cpu_util);
 	}
 
-	return em_pd_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
+	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com
Cc: nm@ti.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, bsegall@google.com,
	festevam@gmail.com, mka@chromium.org, robh@kernel.org,
	amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, khilman@kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, steven.price@arm.com,
	cw00.choi@samsung.com, mingo@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	rui.zhang@intel.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
	orjan.eide@arm.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, qperret@google.com,
	sboyd@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	agross@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	lukasz.luba@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/10] PM / EM: change name of em_pd_energy to em_cpu_energy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:42:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200410084210.24932-7-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410084210.24932-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Energy Model framework supports now other devices than CPUs. Refactor some
of the functions in order to prevent wrong usage. The old function
em_pd_energy has to generic name. It must not be used without proper
cpumask pointer, which is possible only for CPU devices. Thus, rename it
and add proper description to warn of potential wrong usage for other
devices.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/energy_model.h | 11 ++++++++---
 kernel/sched/fair.c          |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index 73c43e4c8a3b..1790199aa24f 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -83,15 +83,20 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
 void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev);
 
 /**
- * em_pd_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a perf. domain
+ * em_cpu_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a
+		performance domain
  * @pd		: performance domain for which energy has to be estimated
  * @max_util	: highest utilization among CPUs of the domain
  * @sum_util	: sum of the utilization of all CPUs in the domain
  *
+ * This function must be used only for CPU devices. There is no validation,
+ * i.e. if the EM is a CPU type and has cpumask allocated. It is called from
+ * the scheduler code quite frequently and that is why there is not checks.
+ *
  * Return: the sum of the energy consumed by the CPUs of the domain assuming
  * a capacity state satisfying the max utilization of the domain.
  */
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 				unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	unsigned long freq, scale_cpu;
@@ -199,7 +204,7 @@ static inline struct em_perf_domain *em_pd_get(struct device *dev)
 static inline void em_pd_put(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 			unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 02f323b85b6d..30f6392f628c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6464,7 +6464,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 		max_util = max(max_util, cpu_util);
 	}
 
-	return em_pd_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
+	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com
Cc: nm@ti.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, bsegall@google.com,
	festevam@gmail.com, mka@chromium.org, robh@kernel.org,
	amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	khilman@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	steven.price@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com, orjan.eide@arm.com,
	daniel@ffwll.ch, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, qperret@google.com,
	sboyd@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	agross@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	lukasz.luba@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/10] PM / EM: change name of em_pd_energy to em_cpu_energy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:42:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200410084210.24932-7-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410084210.24932-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Energy Model framework supports now other devices than CPUs. Refactor some
of the functions in order to prevent wrong usage. The old function
em_pd_energy has to generic name. It must not be used without proper
cpumask pointer, which is possible only for CPU devices. Thus, rename it
and add proper description to warn of potential wrong usage for other
devices.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/energy_model.h | 11 ++++++++---
 kernel/sched/fair.c          |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index 73c43e4c8a3b..1790199aa24f 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -83,15 +83,20 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
 void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev);
 
 /**
- * em_pd_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a perf. domain
+ * em_cpu_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a
+		performance domain
  * @pd		: performance domain for which energy has to be estimated
  * @max_util	: highest utilization among CPUs of the domain
  * @sum_util	: sum of the utilization of all CPUs in the domain
  *
+ * This function must be used only for CPU devices. There is no validation,
+ * i.e. if the EM is a CPU type and has cpumask allocated. It is called from
+ * the scheduler code quite frequently and that is why there is not checks.
+ *
  * Return: the sum of the energy consumed by the CPUs of the domain assuming
  * a capacity state satisfying the max utilization of the domain.
  */
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 				unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	unsigned long freq, scale_cpu;
@@ -199,7 +204,7 @@ static inline struct em_perf_domain *em_pd_get(struct device *dev)
 static inline void em_pd_put(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 			unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 02f323b85b6d..30f6392f628c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6464,7 +6464,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 		max_util = max(max_util, cpu_util);
 	}
 
-	return em_pd_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
+	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com
Cc: nm@ti.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, bsegall@google.com, mka@chromium.org,
	amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, khilman@kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, steven.price@arm.com,
	cw00.choi@samsung.com, mingo@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	rui.zhang@intel.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
	orjan.eide@arm.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, qperret@google.com,
	sboyd@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	agross@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	lukasz.luba@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/10] PM / EM: change name of em_pd_energy to em_cpu_energy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:42:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200410084210.24932-7-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410084210.24932-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Energy Model framework supports now other devices than CPUs. Refactor some
of the functions in order to prevent wrong usage. The old function
em_pd_energy has to generic name. It must not be used without proper
cpumask pointer, which is possible only for CPU devices. Thus, rename it
and add proper description to warn of potential wrong usage for other
devices.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/energy_model.h | 11 ++++++++---
 kernel/sched/fair.c          |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index 73c43e4c8a3b..1790199aa24f 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -83,15 +83,20 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
 void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev);
 
 /**
- * em_pd_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a perf. domain
+ * em_cpu_energy() - Estimates the energy consumed by the CPUs of a
+		performance domain
  * @pd		: performance domain for which energy has to be estimated
  * @max_util	: highest utilization among CPUs of the domain
  * @sum_util	: sum of the utilization of all CPUs in the domain
  *
+ * This function must be used only for CPU devices. There is no validation,
+ * i.e. if the EM is a CPU type and has cpumask allocated. It is called from
+ * the scheduler code quite frequently and that is why there is not checks.
+ *
  * Return: the sum of the energy consumed by the CPUs of the domain assuming
  * a capacity state satisfying the max utilization of the domain.
  */
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 				unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	unsigned long freq, scale_cpu;
@@ -199,7 +204,7 @@ static inline struct em_perf_domain *em_pd_get(struct device *dev)
 static inline void em_pd_put(struct device *dev)
 {
 }
-static inline unsigned long em_pd_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 			unsigned long max_util, unsigned long sum_util)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 02f323b85b6d..30f6392f628c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6464,7 +6464,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 		max_util = max(max_util, cpu_util);
 	}
 
-	return em_pd_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
+	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-10  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-10  8:42 [PATCH v6 00/10] Add support for devices in the Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] PM / EM: change naming convention from 'capacity' to 'performance' Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23  9:55   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23  9:55     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23  9:55     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23  9:55     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] PM / EM: introduce em_dev_register_perf_domain function Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 10:46   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 10:46     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 10:46     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 10:46     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] PM / EM: update callback structure and add device pointer Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 13:22   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 13:22     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 13:22     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 13:22     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:28       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:28       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:28       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:12   ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:12     ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:12     ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:12     ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:34     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:34       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:34       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:34       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 14:35   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-10 14:35     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-10 14:35     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-10 14:35     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-23 15:12   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:12     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:12     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:12     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:57     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:57       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:57       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:57       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:15       ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:15         ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:15         ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:15         ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:19         ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:19           ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:19           ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:19           ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] PM / EM: remove em_register_perf_domain Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:14   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:14     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:14     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:14     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10  8:42 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2020-04-10  8:42   ` [PATCH v6 06/10] PM / EM: change name of em_pd_energy to em_cpu_energy Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:28   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] Documentation: power: update Energy Model description Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:07   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:07     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:07     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:07     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] OPP: refactor dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() and update related drivers Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:47   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:47     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:47     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:47     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] thermal: devfreq_cooling: Refactor code and switch to use Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:57   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:57     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:57     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:57     ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:02     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:02       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:02       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:02       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:43       ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:43         ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:43         ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:43         ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10  8:42 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] drm/panfrost: Register devfreq cooling and attempt to add " Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10  8:42   ` Lukasz Luba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200410084210.24932-7-lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=orjan.eide@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.