From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com,
Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, nm@ti.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
qperret@google.com, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
kernel@pengutronix.de, khilman@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, steven.price@arm.com,
tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net,
orjan.eide@arm.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, mka@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] PM / EM: update callback structure and add device pointer
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:28:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <245720a0-c812-ccc8-235e-6eed6f216e4b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423132243.GA65632@linaro.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 4/23/20 2:22 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:42:03AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> The Energy Model framework is going to support devices other that CPUs. In
>> order to make this happen change the callback function and add pointer to
>> a device as an argument.
>>
>> Update the related users to use new function and new callback from the
>> Energy Model.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>> ---
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static struct em_perf_domain *
>> +em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states, struct em_data_callback *cb,
>> + cpumask_t *span)
>> {
>> unsigned long opp_eff, prev_opp_eff = ULONG_MAX;
>> unsigned long power, freq, prev_freq = 0;
>> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static struct em_perf_domain *em_create_pd(cpumask_t *span, int nr_states,
>> * lowest performance state of 'cpu' above 'freq' and updates
>> * 'power' and 'freq' accordingly.
>> */
>> - ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, cpu);
>> + ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, dev);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("pd%d: invalid perf. state: %d\n", cpu, ret);
>> goto free_ps_table;
>
> Why are the changes 'cpu' to 'dev' in the patch 4/10 instead of this one ?
The patch 4/10 is quite big and I didn't want to put also this change in
there. I thought for readability it would be better to have a separate
patch with self-contained change (or I got your suggestion too strict).
In this patch I just wanted to show more precisely that this function
callback 'active_power' which is used by 2 users (currently):
cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c and opp/of.c
is going to change an argument and these files are affected.
The 4/10 changes a lot lines, while first 3 patches can be treated as
a preparation for the upcoming major change (4/10).
Thank you for the review.
Regards,
Lukasz
>
>> @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
>> }
>>
>> /* Create the performance domain and add it to the Energy Model. */
>> - pd = em_create_pd(span, nr_states, cb);
>> + pd = em_create_pd(dev, nr_states, cb, span);
>> if (!pd) {
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto unlock;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: nm@ti.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
bsegall@google.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
festevam@gmail.com, mka@chromium.org, robh@kernel.org,
amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, khilman@kernel.org,
agross@kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
steven.price@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-imx@nxp.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, mgorman@suse.de,
orjan.eide@arm.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
airlied@linux.ie, tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, qperret@google.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net,
shawnguo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] PM / EM: update callback structure and add device pointer
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:28:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <245720a0-c812-ccc8-235e-6eed6f216e4b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423132243.GA65632@linaro.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 4/23/20 2:22 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:42:03AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> The Energy Model framework is going to support devices other that CPUs. In
>> order to make this happen change the callback function and add pointer to
>> a device as an argument.
>>
>> Update the related users to use new function and new callback from the
>> Energy Model.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>> ---
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static struct em_perf_domain *
>> +em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states, struct em_data_callback *cb,
>> + cpumask_t *span)
>> {
>> unsigned long opp_eff, prev_opp_eff = ULONG_MAX;
>> unsigned long power, freq, prev_freq = 0;
>> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static struct em_perf_domain *em_create_pd(cpumask_t *span, int nr_states,
>> * lowest performance state of 'cpu' above 'freq' and updates
>> * 'power' and 'freq' accordingly.
>> */
>> - ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, cpu);
>> + ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, dev);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("pd%d: invalid perf. state: %d\n", cpu, ret);
>> goto free_ps_table;
>
> Why are the changes 'cpu' to 'dev' in the patch 4/10 instead of this one ?
The patch 4/10 is quite big and I didn't want to put also this change in
there. I thought for readability it would be better to have a separate
patch with self-contained change (or I got your suggestion too strict).
In this patch I just wanted to show more precisely that this function
callback 'active_power' which is used by 2 users (currently):
cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c and opp/of.c
is going to change an argument and these files are affected.
The 4/10 changes a lot lines, while first 3 patches can be treated as
a preparation for the upcoming major change (4/10).
Thank you for the review.
Regards,
Lukasz
>
>> @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
>> }
>>
>> /* Create the performance domain and add it to the Energy Model. */
>> - pd = em_create_pd(span, nr_states, cb);
>> + pd = em_create_pd(dev, nr_states, cb, span);
>> if (!pd) {
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto unlock;
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: nm@ti.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
bsegall@google.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
festevam@gmail.com, mka@chromium.org, robh@kernel.org,
amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
khilman@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
steven.price@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-imx@nxp.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, mgorman@suse.de,
orjan.eide@arm.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
airlied@linux.ie, tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, qperret@google.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net,
shawnguo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] PM / EM: update callback structure and add device pointer
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:28:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <245720a0-c812-ccc8-235e-6eed6f216e4b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423132243.GA65632@linaro.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 4/23/20 2:22 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:42:03AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> The Energy Model framework is going to support devices other that CPUs. In
>> order to make this happen change the callback function and add pointer to
>> a device as an argument.
>>
>> Update the related users to use new function and new callback from the
>> Energy Model.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>> ---
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static struct em_perf_domain *
>> +em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states, struct em_data_callback *cb,
>> + cpumask_t *span)
>> {
>> unsigned long opp_eff, prev_opp_eff = ULONG_MAX;
>> unsigned long power, freq, prev_freq = 0;
>> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static struct em_perf_domain *em_create_pd(cpumask_t *span, int nr_states,
>> * lowest performance state of 'cpu' above 'freq' and updates
>> * 'power' and 'freq' accordingly.
>> */
>> - ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, cpu);
>> + ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, dev);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("pd%d: invalid perf. state: %d\n", cpu, ret);
>> goto free_ps_table;
>
> Why are the changes 'cpu' to 'dev' in the patch 4/10 instead of this one ?
The patch 4/10 is quite big and I didn't want to put also this change in
there. I thought for readability it would be better to have a separate
patch with self-contained change (or I got your suggestion too strict).
In this patch I just wanted to show more precisely that this function
callback 'active_power' which is used by 2 users (currently):
cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c and opp/of.c
is going to change an argument and these files are affected.
The 4/10 changes a lot lines, while first 3 patches can be treated as
a preparation for the upcoming major change (4/10).
Thank you for the review.
Regards,
Lukasz
>
>> @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
>> }
>>
>> /* Create the performance domain and add it to the Energy Model. */
>> - pd = em_create_pd(span, nr_states, cb);
>> + pd = em_create_pd(dev, nr_states, cb, span);
>> if (!pd) {
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto unlock;
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: nm@ti.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
bsegall@google.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com,
mka@chromium.org, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
khilman@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
steven.price@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-imx@nxp.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, mgorman@suse.de,
orjan.eide@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
airlied@linux.ie, tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, qperret@google.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net,
shawnguo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] PM / EM: update callback structure and add device pointer
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:28:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <245720a0-c812-ccc8-235e-6eed6f216e4b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423132243.GA65632@linaro.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 4/23/20 2:22 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:42:03AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> The Energy Model framework is going to support devices other that CPUs. In
>> order to make this happen change the callback function and add pointer to
>> a device as an argument.
>>
>> Update the related users to use new function and new callback from the
>> Energy Model.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>> ---
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static struct em_perf_domain *
>> +em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states, struct em_data_callback *cb,
>> + cpumask_t *span)
>> {
>> unsigned long opp_eff, prev_opp_eff = ULONG_MAX;
>> unsigned long power, freq, prev_freq = 0;
>> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static struct em_perf_domain *em_create_pd(cpumask_t *span, int nr_states,
>> * lowest performance state of 'cpu' above 'freq' and updates
>> * 'power' and 'freq' accordingly.
>> */
>> - ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, cpu);
>> + ret = cb->active_power(&power, &freq, dev);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("pd%d: invalid perf. state: %d\n", cpu, ret);
>> goto free_ps_table;
>
> Why are the changes 'cpu' to 'dev' in the patch 4/10 instead of this one ?
The patch 4/10 is quite big and I didn't want to put also this change in
there. I thought for readability it would be better to have a separate
patch with self-contained change (or I got your suggestion too strict).
In this patch I just wanted to show more precisely that this function
callback 'active_power' which is used by 2 users (currently):
cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c and opp/of.c
is going to change an argument and these files are affected.
The 4/10 changes a lot lines, while first 3 patches can be treated as
a preparation for the upcoming major change (4/10).
Thank you for the review.
Regards,
Lukasz
>
>> @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
>> }
>>
>> /* Create the performance domain and add it to the Energy Model. */
>> - pd = em_create_pd(span, nr_states, cb);
>> + pd = em_create_pd(dev, nr_states, cb, span);
>> if (!pd) {
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto unlock;
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-10 8:42 [PATCH v6 00/10] Add support for devices in the Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] PM / EM: change naming convention from 'capacity' to 'performance' Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 9:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 9:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 9:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 9:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] PM / EM: introduce em_dev_register_perf_domain function Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 10:46 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 10:46 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 10:46 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 10:46 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] PM / EM: update callback structure and add device pointer Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 13:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 13:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 13:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 13:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:12 ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:12 ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:12 ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:12 ` Luis Gerhorst
2020-04-10 11:34 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:34 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:34 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 11:34 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 14:35 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-10 14:35 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-10 14:35 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-10 14:35 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-23 15:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:57 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:57 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:57 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:57 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] PM / EM: remove em_register_perf_domain Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:14 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:14 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:14 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:14 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] PM / EM: change name of em_pd_energy to em_cpu_energy Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 15:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] Documentation: power: update Energy Model description Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] OPP: refactor dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() and update related drivers Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 16:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 16:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] thermal: devfreq_cooling: Refactor code and switch to use Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-23 17:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-23 17:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:02 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:02 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:02 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:02 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-24 10:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-24 10:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] drm/panfrost: Register devfreq cooling and attempt to add " Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-10 8:42 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=245720a0-c812-ccc8-235e-6eed6f216e4b@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=orjan.eide@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.