From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> To: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, ohad@wizery.com, s-anna@ti.com, Markus.Elfring@web.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 22:17:23 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200420051720.GE1516868@builder.lan> (raw) In-Reply-To: <9a4b6342-750e-284a-2343-8151b478589b@linaro.org> On Wed 15 Apr 14:23 PDT 2020, Alex Elder wrote: > On 4/15/20 3:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > Improve the readability of function rproc_alloc_firmware() by using > > a non-negated condition. > > > > Suggested-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> > > If it were me, I'd move the comment above the if statement and > perhaps reword it a little bit to describe what's happening. > But no matter, this looks good. > This would also avoid the fact that we have a multiline block without braces (which isn't needed, but looks odd to me). So that sounds like a good idea. Regards, Bjorn > Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> > > > --- > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > index ebaff496ef81..0bfa6998705d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > @@ -1984,14 +1984,14 @@ static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, > > { > > const char *p; > > > > - if (!firmware) > > + if (firmware) > > + p = kstrdup_const(firmware, GFP_KERNEL); > > + else > > /* > > * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then > > * construct a default name. > > */ > > p = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "rproc-%s-fw", name); > > - else > > - p = kstrdup_const(firmware, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > if (!p) > > return -ENOMEM; > > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> To: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, ohad@wizery.com, s-anna@ti.com, Markus.Elfring@web.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 22:17:20 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200420051720.GE1516868@builder.lan> (raw) Message-ID: <20200420051720.iBd8rr4h8HUIjG1ecVfBDpmHgL4uoj_qtLJazfeWqV8@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <9a4b6342-750e-284a-2343-8151b478589b@linaro.org> On Wed 15 Apr 14:23 PDT 2020, Alex Elder wrote: > On 4/15/20 3:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > Improve the readability of function rproc_alloc_firmware() by using > > a non-negated condition. > > > > Suggested-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> > > If it were me, I'd move the comment above the if statement and > perhaps reword it a little bit to describe what's happening. > But no matter, this looks good. > This would also avoid the fact that we have a multiline block without braces (which isn't needed, but looks odd to me). So that sounds like a good idea. Regards, Bjorn > Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> > > > --- > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > index ebaff496ef81..0bfa6998705d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > @@ -1984,14 +1984,14 @@ static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, > > { > > const char *p; > > > > - if (!firmware) > > + if (firmware) > > + p = kstrdup_const(firmware, GFP_KERNEL); > > + else > > /* > > * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then > > * construct a default name. > > */ > > p = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "rproc-%s-fw", name); > > - else > > - p = kstrdup_const(firmware, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > if (!p) > > return -ENOMEM; > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 5:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-15 20:48 [PATCH v2 0/7] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] remoteproc: Fix IDR initialisation in rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-17 13:37 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 13:37 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-20 5:00 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:00 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:00 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 21:28 ` Alex Elder 2020-04-20 5:09 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:09 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:09 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 9:24 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-20 9:24 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-20 21:29 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] remoteproc: Simplify default name allocation Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 21:26 ` Alex Elder 2020-04-20 5:10 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:10 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:10 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] remoteproc: Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrup() Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 21:25 ` Alex Elder 2020-04-17 13:44 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 13:44 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-20 5:21 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:21 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:21 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-17 16:12 ` [v2 4/7] remoteproc: Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrdup() Markus Elfring 2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 21:23 ` Alex Elder 2020-04-20 5:17 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message] 2020-04-20 5:17 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-20 5:17 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-16 6:26 ` Markus Elfring 2020-04-17 13:39 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 13:39 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 15:48 ` [v2 " Markus Elfring 2020-04-17 16:15 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 16:15 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 20:58 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-17 21:28 ` [PATCH v2 " Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] remoteproc: Split rproc_ops allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-17 13:49 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 13:49 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 15:35 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 15:35 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 21:56 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] remoteproc: Get rid of tedious error path Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-17 13:50 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 13:50 ` Suman Anna 2020-04-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc() Suman Anna 2020-04-17 13:34 ` Suman Anna
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200420051720.GE1516868@builder.lan \ --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \ --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \ --cc=elder@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=ohad@wizery.com \ --cc=s-anna@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.