All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com
Cc: s-anna@ti.com, elder@linaro.org, Markus.Elfring@web.de,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:24:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e980e9e6-04d6-60b8-c921-d2fb1f2b9a1b@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415204858.2448-3-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On 4/15/20 10:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Make the firmware name allocation a function on its own in an
> effort to cleanup function rproc_alloc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 80056513ae71..4dee63f319ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1979,6 +1979,33 @@ static const struct device_type rproc_type = {
>  	.release	= rproc_type_release,
>  };
>  
> +static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				const char *name, const char *firmware)

nitpicking: here you do not allocate memory for the firmware but for its name
The name of the function seems to me quite confusing...

Else LGTM for the series

Thanks,

Arnaud

> +{
> +	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> +	int name_len;
> +
> +	if (!firmware) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> +		 * construct a default name.
> +		 */
> +		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> +		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> +	} else {
> +		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	rproc->firmware = p;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
>   * @dev: the underlying device
> @@ -2007,42 +2034,21 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  			  const char *firmware, int len)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc;
> -	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> -	int name_len;
>  
>  	if (!dev || !name || !ops)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (!firmware) {
> -		/*
> -		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> -		 * construct a default name.
> -		 */
> -		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> -		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> -	} else {
> -		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	rproc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rproc) + len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc) {
> -		kfree(p);
> +	if (!rproc)
>  		return NULL;
> -	}
> +
> +	if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> +		goto free_rproc;
>  
>  	rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc->ops) {
> -		kfree(p);
> -		kfree(rproc);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> +	if (!rproc->ops)
> +		goto free_firmware;
>  
> -	rproc->firmware = p;
>  	rproc->name = name;
>  	rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
>  	rproc->auto_boot = true;
> @@ -2091,6 +2097,12 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
>  
>  	return rproc;
> +
> +free_firmware:
> +	kfree(rproc->firmware);
> +free_rproc:
> +	kfree(rproc);
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_alloc);
>  
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <s-anna@ti.com>, <elder@linaro.org>, <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:24:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e980e9e6-04d6-60b8-c921-d2fb1f2b9a1b@st.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200420092412.7WfKmXn15pC5qlZOkTJCvCy8DQuvCXBa78Il3qp-DP4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415204858.2448-3-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On 4/15/20 10:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Make the firmware name allocation a function on its own in an
> effort to cleanup function rproc_alloc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 80056513ae71..4dee63f319ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1979,6 +1979,33 @@ static const struct device_type rproc_type = {
>  	.release	= rproc_type_release,
>  };
>  
> +static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				const char *name, const char *firmware)

nitpicking: here you do not allocate memory for the firmware but for its name
The name of the function seems to me quite confusing...

Else LGTM for the series

Thanks,

Arnaud

> +{
> +	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> +	int name_len;
> +
> +	if (!firmware) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> +		 * construct a default name.
> +		 */
> +		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> +		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> +	} else {
> +		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	rproc->firmware = p;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
>   * @dev: the underlying device
> @@ -2007,42 +2034,21 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  			  const char *firmware, int len)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc;
> -	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> -	int name_len;
>  
>  	if (!dev || !name || !ops)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (!firmware) {
> -		/*
> -		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> -		 * construct a default name.
> -		 */
> -		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> -		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> -	} else {
> -		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	rproc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rproc) + len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc) {
> -		kfree(p);
> +	if (!rproc)
>  		return NULL;
> -	}
> +
> +	if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> +		goto free_rproc;
>  
>  	rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc->ops) {
> -		kfree(p);
> -		kfree(rproc);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> +	if (!rproc->ops)
> +		goto free_firmware;
>  
> -	rproc->firmware = p;
>  	rproc->name = name;
>  	rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
>  	rproc->auto_boot = true;
> @@ -2091,6 +2097,12 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
>  
>  	return rproc;
> +
> +free_firmware:
> +	kfree(rproc->firmware);
> +free_rproc:
> +	kfree(rproc);
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_alloc);
>  
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 20:48 [PATCH v2 0/7] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] remoteproc: Fix IDR initialisation in rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 13:37   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:37     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-20  5:00   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:00     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:00       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:28   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-20  5:09   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:09     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:09       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  9:24   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2020-04-20  9:24     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-20 21:29     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] remoteproc: Simplify default name allocation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:26   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-20  5:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:10     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:10       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] remoteproc: Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrup() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:25   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-17 13:44     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:44       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-20  5:21       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:21         ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:21           ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-17 16:12   ` [v2 4/7] remoteproc: Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrdup() Markus Elfring
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:23   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-20  5:17     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:17       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:17         ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-16  6:26   ` Markus Elfring
2020-04-17 13:39     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:39       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 15:48       ` [v2 " Markus Elfring
2020-04-17 16:15         ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 16:15           ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 20:58         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 21:28       ` [PATCH v2 " Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] remoteproc: Split rproc_ops allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 13:49   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:49     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 15:35     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 15:35       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 21:56     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] remoteproc: Get rid of tedious error path Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 13:50   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:50     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc() Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:34   ` Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e980e9e6-04d6-60b8-c921-d2fb1f2b9a1b@st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.