From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
slyfox@gentoo.org, ast@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, ravenexp@gmail.com, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:43:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617174348.70710c3ecb14005fb1b9ec39@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:18 +0000 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> Tiezhu Yang had sent out a patch set with a slew of kmod selftest
> fixes, and one patch which modified kmod to return 254 when a module
> was not found. This opened up pandora's box about why that was being
> used for and low and behold its because when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used
> we call a kernel_wait4() call but have never unwrapped the error code.
> The commit log for that fix details the rationale for the approach
> taken. I'd appreciate some review on that, in particular nfs folks
> as it seems a case was never really hit before.
>
> This goes boot tested, selftested with kmod, and 0-day gives its
> build blessings.
Any thoughts on which kernel version(s) need some/all of these fixes?
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 20 +++++------
> fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/sched/task.h | 13 ++++++++
> kernel/kmod.c | 5 ++-
> kernel/umh.c | 4 +--
> lib/test_kmod.c | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 10 ++----
> security/keys/request_key.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
I'm not really sure who takes kmod changes - I'll grab these unless
someone shouts at me.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
slyfox@gentoo.org, ast@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, ravenexp@gmail.com, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:43:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617174348.70710c3ecb14005fb1b9ec39@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:18 +0000 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> Tiezhu Yang had sent out a patch set with a slew of kmod selftest
> fixes, and one patch which modified kmod to return 254 when a module
> was not found. This opened up pandora's box about why that was being
> used for and low and behold its because when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used
> we call a kernel_wait4() call but have never unwrapped the error code.
> The commit log for that fix details the rationale for the approach
> taken. I'd appreciate some review on that, in particular nfs folks
> as it seems a case was never really hit before.
>
> This goes boot tested, selftested with kmod, and 0-day gives its
> build blessings.
Any thoughts on which kernel version(s) need some/all of these fixes?
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 20 +++++------
> fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/sched/task.h | 13 ++++++++
> kernel/kmod.c | 5 ++-
> kernel/umh.c | 4 +--
> lib/test_kmod.c | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 10 ++----
> security/keys/request_key.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
I'm not really sure who takes kmod changes - I'll grab these unless
someone shouts at me.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org,
kuba@kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, slyfox@gentoo.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
ravenexp@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:43:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617174348.70710c3ecb14005fb1b9ec39@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:18 +0000 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> Tiezhu Yang had sent out a patch set with a slew of kmod selftest
> fixes, and one patch which modified kmod to return 254 when a module
> was not found. This opened up pandora's box about why that was being
> used for and low and behold its because when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used
> we call a kernel_wait4() call but have never unwrapped the error code.
> The commit log for that fix details the rationale for the approach
> taken. I'd appreciate some review on that, in particular nfs folks
> as it seems a case was never really hit before.
>
> This goes boot tested, selftested with kmod, and 0-day gives its
> build blessings.
Any thoughts on which kernel version(s) need some/all of these fixes?
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 20 +++++------
> fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/sched/task.h | 13 ++++++++
> kernel/kmod.c | 5 ++-
> kernel/umh.c | 4 +--
> lib/test_kmod.c | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 10 ++----
> security/keys/request_key.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
I'm not really sure who takes kmod changes - I'll grab these unless
someone shouts at me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 15:49 [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests: kmod: Use variable NAME in kmod_test_0001() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] test_kmod: Avoid potential double free in trigger_config_run_type() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-23 14:11 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:12 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 15:09 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:12 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 12:05 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 14:43 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 15:54 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:56 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 16:09 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:58 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:59 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:10 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:38 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:27 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 2:54 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 2:54 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 2:54 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 5:22 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 5:24 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 5:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 9:00 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 9:00 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 11:40 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 10:08 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:24 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:53 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 14:08 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 15:38 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:39 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:38 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:48 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:49 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:58 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 16:01 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:03 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-02 4:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 4:26 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 4:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 19:46 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:47 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 0:52 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 0:52 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 0:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 13:28 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:27 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:46 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-18 0:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-06-18 0:43 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Andrew Morton
2020-06-18 0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-19 20:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200617174348.70710c3ecb14005fb1b9ec39@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.