From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com,
slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:00:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626090001.GA30103@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feb6a8c4-2b94-3f95-6637-679e089a71ca@de.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:22:34AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 26.06.20 04:54, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24.06.20 20:32, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> [...]>
> >>> So the translations look correct. But your change is actually a sematic change
> >>> if(ret) will only trigger if there is an error
> >>> if (KWIFEXITED(ret)) will always trigger when the process ends. So we will always overwrite -ECHILD
> >>> and we did not do it before.
> >>>
> >>
> >> So the right fix is
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> >> index f81e8698e36e..a3a3196e84d1 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> >> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
> >> * the real error code is already in sub_info->retval or
> >> * sub_info->retval is 0 anyway, so don't mess with it then.
> >> */
> >> - if (KWIFEXITED(ret))
> >> + if (KWEXITSTATUS(ret))
> >> sub_info->retval = KWEXITSTATUS(ret);
> >> }
> >>
> >> I think.
> >
> > Nope, the right form is to check for WIFEXITED() before using WEXITSTATUS().
>
> But this IS a change over the previous code, no?
> I will test next week as I am travelling right now.
I'm all for reverting back to the previous behavior. If someone wants
a behavior change it should be a separate patch. And out of pure self
interest I'd like to see that change after my addition of the
kernel_wait helper to replace the kernel_wait4 abuse :)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com,
slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626090001.GA30103@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feb6a8c4-2b94-3f95-6637-679e089a71ca@de.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:22:34AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 26.06.20 04:54, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24.06.20 20:32, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> [...]>
> >>> So the translations look correct. But your change is actually a sematic change
> >>> if(ret) will only trigger if there is an error
> >>> if (KWIFEXITED(ret)) will always trigger when the process ends. So we will always overwrite -ECHILD
> >>> and we did not do it before.
> >>>
> >>
> >> So the right fix is
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> >> index f81e8698e36e..a3a3196e84d1 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> >> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
> >> * the real error code is already in sub_info->retval or
> >> * sub_info->retval is 0 anyway, so don't mess with it then.
> >> */
> >> - if (KWIFEXITED(ret))
> >> + if (KWEXITSTATUS(ret))
> >> sub_info->retval = KWEXITSTATUS(ret);
> >> }
> >>
> >> I think.
> >
> > Nope, the right form is to check for WIFEXITED() before using WEXITSTATUS().
>
> But this IS a change over the previous code, no?
> I will test next week as I am travelling right now.
I'm all for reverting back to the previous behavior. If someone wants
a behavior change it should be a separate patch. And out of pure self
interest I'd like to see that change after my addition of the
kernel_wait helper to replace the kernel_wait4 abuse :)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com, bfields@fieldses.org,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
kuba@kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, slyfox@gentoo.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk, dhowells@redhat.com,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
ravenexp@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
chuck.lever@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:00:20 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626090001.GA30103@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feb6a8c4-2b94-3f95-6637-679e089a71ca@de.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:22:34AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 26.06.20 04:54, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24.06.20 20:32, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> [...]>
> >>> So the translations look correct. But your change is actually a sematic change
> >>> if(ret) will only trigger if there is an error
> >>> if (KWIFEXITED(ret)) will always trigger when the process ends. So we will always overwrite -ECHILD
> >>> and we did not do it before.
> >>>
> >>
> >> So the right fix is
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> >> index f81e8698e36e..a3a3196e84d1 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> >> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
> >> * the real error code is already in sub_info->retval or
> >> * sub_info->retval is 0 anyway, so don't mess with it then.
> >> */
> >> - if (KWIFEXITED(ret))
> >> + if (KWEXITSTATUS(ret))
> >> sub_info->retval = KWEXITSTATUS(ret);
> >> }
> >>
> >> I think.
> >
> > Nope, the right form is to check for WIFEXITED() before using WEXITSTATUS().
>
> But this IS a change over the previous code, no?
> I will test next week as I am travelling right now.
I'm all for reverting back to the previous behavior. If someone wants
a behavior change it should be a separate patch. And out of pure self
interest I'd like to see that change after my addition of the
kernel_wait helper to replace the kernel_wait4 abuse :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 15:49 [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests: kmod: Use variable NAME in kmod_test_0001() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] test_kmod: Avoid potential double free in trigger_config_run_type() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-23 14:11 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:12 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 15:09 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:12 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 12:05 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 14:43 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 15:54 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:56 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 16:09 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:58 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:59 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:10 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:38 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:27 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 2:54 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 2:54 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 2:54 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 5:22 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 5:24 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 5:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-06-26 9:00 ` [Bridge] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 11:40 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 10:08 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:24 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:53 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 14:08 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 15:38 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:39 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:38 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:48 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:49 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:58 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 16:01 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:03 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-02 4:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 4:26 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 4:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 19:46 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:47 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 0:52 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 0:52 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 0:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 13:28 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:27 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:46 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-18 0:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Andrew Morton
2020-06-18 0:43 ` [Bridge] " Andrew Morton
2020-06-18 0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-19 20:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200626090001.GA30103@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markward@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.