All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 29/81] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:35:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125093600.2766-30-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125093600.2766-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

The access to a tracked memory page leads to two types of actions from the
introspection tool: either the access is allowed (maybe with different
data for the source operand) or the vCPU should re-enter in guest
(the page is not tracked anymore, the instruction was skipped/emulated by
the introspection tool, etc.). These new callbacks must return 'true'
for the first case and 'false' for the second.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |  48 +++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                |  81 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h       |   4 +
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c         | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 00a66c4d4d3c..c10f0f65c77a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
 #define _ASM_X86_KVM_PAGE_TRACK_H
 
 enum kvm_page_track_mode {
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREREAD,
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREWRITE,
 	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE,
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREEXEC,
 	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX,
 };
 
@@ -22,6 +25,33 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head {
 struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 	struct hlist_node node;
 
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is reading the read-tracked page
+	 * and the read emulation is about to happen.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the read access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address read by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address read by guest.
+	 * @bytes: the read length.
+	 * @node: this node.
+	 */
+	bool (*track_preread)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			      int bytes,
+			      struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
+	 * and the write emulation didn't happened yet.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the write access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address written by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address written by guest.
+	 * @new: the data was written to the address.
+	 * @bytes: the written length.
+	 * @node: this node
+	 */
+	bool (*track_prewrite)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			       const u8 *new, int bytes,
+			       struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
 	 * and write emulation is finished at that time.
@@ -36,6 +66,17 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 	void (*track_write)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			    const u8 *new, int bytes,
 			    struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is fetching from a exec-tracked page
+	 * and the fetch emulation is about to happen.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the fetch access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address fetched by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address fetched by guest.
+	 * @node: this node.
+	 */
+	bool (*track_preexec)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			      struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when memory slot is being created
 	 *
@@ -49,7 +90,7 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 				  struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when memory slot is being moved or removed
-	 * users can drop write-protection for the pages in that memory slot
+	 * users can drop active protection for the pages in that memory slot
 	 *
 	 * @kvm: the kvm where memory slot being moved or removed
 	 * @slot: the memory slot being moved or removed
@@ -81,7 +122,12 @@ kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 void
 kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+bool kvm_page_track_preread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			    int bytes);
+bool kvm_page_track_prewrite(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			     const u8 *new, int bytes);
 void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			  const u8 *new, int bytes);
+bool kvm_page_track_preexec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva);
 void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 1631e2367085..36add6fb712f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1124,6 +1124,31 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
 	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
 }
 
+static bool spte_read_protect(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	u64 spte = *sptep;
+	bool exec_only_supported = (shadow_present_mask == 0ull);
+
+	rmap_printk("rmap_read_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!exec_only_supported);
+
+	spte = spte & ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_PRESENT_MASK);
+
+	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+}
+
+static bool spte_exec_protect(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	u64 spte = *sptep;
+
+	rmap_printk("rmap_exec_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
+
+	spte = spte & ~PT_USER_MASK;
+
+	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+}
+
 static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 				 struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 				 bool pt_protect)
@@ -1138,6 +1163,32 @@ static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return flush;
 }
 
+static bool __rmap_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	bool flush = false;
+	u64 *sptep;
+
+	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+		flush |= spte_read_protect(sptep);
+
+	return flush;
+}
+
+static bool __rmap_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	bool flush = false;
+	u64 *sptep;
+
+	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+		flush |= spte_exec_protect(sptep);
+
+	return flush;
+}
+
 static bool spte_clear_dirty(u64 *sptep)
 {
 	u64 spte = *sptep;
@@ -1316,6 +1367,36 @@ bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return write_protected;
 }
 
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
+	bool read_protected = false;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = PG_LEVEL_4K; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
+		rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
+		read_protected |= __rmap_read_protect(kvm, rmap_head);
+	}
+
+	return read_protected;
+}
+
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
+	bool exec_protected = false;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = PG_LEVEL_4K; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
+		rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
+		exec_protected |= __rmap_exec_protect(kvm, rmap_head);
+	}
+
+	return exec_protected;
+}
+
 static bool rmap_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn)
 {
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index bfc6389edc28..6fa15728f6ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
 void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(struct kvm *kvm,
 					u64 start_gfn, u64 pages);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index 27a8d1a02e84..ebbfd99a69da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 /*
- * Support KVM gust page tracking
+ * Support KVM guest page tracking
  *
  * This feature allows us to track page access in guest. Currently, only
  * write access is tracked.
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
  * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ * @mode: tracking mode.
  */
 void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -114,9 +114,16 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 */
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 
-	if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
+	if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREWRITE || mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE) {
 		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
 			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	} else if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREREAD) {
+		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
+			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	} else if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREEXEC) {
+		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
+			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
 
@@ -131,7 +138,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
  * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ * @mode: tracking mode.
  */
 void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 				     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -224,12 +231,80 @@ kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier);
 
+/*
+ * Notify the node that a read access is about to happen. Returning false
+ * doesn't stop the other nodes from being called, but it will stop
+ * the emulation.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the read page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ *
+ * The nodes will always be in conflict if they track the same page:
+ * - accepting a read won't guarantee that the next node will not override
+ *   the data (filling new/bytes and setting data_ready)
+ * - filling new/bytes with custom data won't guarantee that the next node
+ *   will not override that
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_preread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			    int bytes)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
+		if (n->track_preread)
+			if (!n->track_preread(vcpu, gpa, gva, bytes, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Notify the node that a write access is about to happen. Returning false
+ * doesn't stop the other nodes from being called, but it will stop
+ * the emulation.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_prewrite(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			     const u8 *new, int bytes)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
+		if (n->track_prewrite)
+			if (!n->track_prewrite(vcpu, gpa, gva, new, bytes, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is
  * finished at this time.
  *
- * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is
- * interested in by itself.
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
  */
 void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			  const u8 *new, int bytes)
@@ -251,12 +326,42 @@ void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Notify the node that an instruction is about to be executed.
+ * Returning false doesn't stop the other nodes from being called,
+ * but it will stop the emulation with X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_preexec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
+		if (n->track_preexec)
+			if (!n->track_preexec(vcpu, gpa, gva, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Notify the node that memory slot is being removed or moved so that it can
- * drop write-protection for the pages in the memory slot.
+ * drop active protection for the pages in the memory slot.
  *
- * The node should figure out it has any write-protected pages in this slot
- * by itself.
+ * The node should figure out if the page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
  */
 void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
 {

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 29/81] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:35:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125093600.2766-30-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125093600.2766-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

The access to a tracked memory page leads to two types of actions from the
introspection tool: either the access is allowed (maybe with different
data for the source operand) or the vCPU should re-enter in guest
(the page is not tracked anymore, the instruction was skipped/emulated by
the introspection tool, etc.). These new callbacks must return 'true'
for the first case and 'false' for the second.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |  48 +++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                |  81 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h       |   4 +
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c         | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 00a66c4d4d3c..c10f0f65c77a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
 #define _ASM_X86_KVM_PAGE_TRACK_H
 
 enum kvm_page_track_mode {
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREREAD,
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREWRITE,
 	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE,
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREEXEC,
 	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX,
 };
 
@@ -22,6 +25,33 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head {
 struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 	struct hlist_node node;
 
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is reading the read-tracked page
+	 * and the read emulation is about to happen.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the read access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address read by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address read by guest.
+	 * @bytes: the read length.
+	 * @node: this node.
+	 */
+	bool (*track_preread)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			      int bytes,
+			      struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
+	 * and the write emulation didn't happened yet.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the write access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address written by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address written by guest.
+	 * @new: the data was written to the address.
+	 * @bytes: the written length.
+	 * @node: this node
+	 */
+	bool (*track_prewrite)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			       const u8 *new, int bytes,
+			       struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
 	 * and write emulation is finished at that time.
@@ -36,6 +66,17 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 	void (*track_write)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			    const u8 *new, int bytes,
 			    struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is fetching from a exec-tracked page
+	 * and the fetch emulation is about to happen.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the fetch access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address fetched by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address fetched by guest.
+	 * @node: this node.
+	 */
+	bool (*track_preexec)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			      struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when memory slot is being created
 	 *
@@ -49,7 +90,7 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 				  struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when memory slot is being moved or removed
-	 * users can drop write-protection for the pages in that memory slot
+	 * users can drop active protection for the pages in that memory slot
 	 *
 	 * @kvm: the kvm where memory slot being moved or removed
 	 * @slot: the memory slot being moved or removed
@@ -81,7 +122,12 @@ kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 void
 kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+bool kvm_page_track_preread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			    int bytes);
+bool kvm_page_track_prewrite(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			     const u8 *new, int bytes);
 void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			  const u8 *new, int bytes);
+bool kvm_page_track_preexec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva);
 void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 1631e2367085..36add6fb712f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1124,6 +1124,31 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
 	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
 }
 
+static bool spte_read_protect(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	u64 spte = *sptep;
+	bool exec_only_supported = (shadow_present_mask == 0ull);
+
+	rmap_printk("rmap_read_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!exec_only_supported);
+
+	spte = spte & ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_PRESENT_MASK);
+
+	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+}
+
+static bool spte_exec_protect(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	u64 spte = *sptep;
+
+	rmap_printk("rmap_exec_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
+
+	spte = spte & ~PT_USER_MASK;
+
+	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+}
+
 static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 				 struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 				 bool pt_protect)
@@ -1138,6 +1163,32 @@ static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return flush;
 }
 
+static bool __rmap_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	bool flush = false;
+	u64 *sptep;
+
+	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+		flush |= spte_read_protect(sptep);
+
+	return flush;
+}
+
+static bool __rmap_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	bool flush = false;
+	u64 *sptep;
+
+	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+		flush |= spte_exec_protect(sptep);
+
+	return flush;
+}
+
 static bool spte_clear_dirty(u64 *sptep)
 {
 	u64 spte = *sptep;
@@ -1316,6 +1367,36 @@ bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return write_protected;
 }
 
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
+	bool read_protected = false;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = PG_LEVEL_4K; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
+		rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
+		read_protected |= __rmap_read_protect(kvm, rmap_head);
+	}
+
+	return read_protected;
+}
+
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
+	bool exec_protected = false;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = PG_LEVEL_4K; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
+		rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
+		exec_protected |= __rmap_exec_protect(kvm, rmap_head);
+	}
+
+	return exec_protected;
+}
+
 static bool rmap_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn)
 {
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index bfc6389edc28..6fa15728f6ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
 void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(struct kvm *kvm,
 					u64 start_gfn, u64 pages);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index 27a8d1a02e84..ebbfd99a69da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 /*
- * Support KVM gust page tracking
+ * Support KVM guest page tracking
  *
  * This feature allows us to track page access in guest. Currently, only
  * write access is tracked.
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
  * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ * @mode: tracking mode.
  */
 void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -114,9 +114,16 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 */
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 
-	if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
+	if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREWRITE || mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE) {
 		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
 			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	} else if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREREAD) {
+		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
+			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	} else if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREEXEC) {
+		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
+			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
 
@@ -131,7 +138,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
  * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ * @mode: tracking mode.
  */
 void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 				     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -224,12 +231,80 @@ kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier);
 
+/*
+ * Notify the node that a read access is about to happen. Returning false
+ * doesn't stop the other nodes from being called, but it will stop
+ * the emulation.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the read page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ *
+ * The nodes will always be in conflict if they track the same page:
+ * - accepting a read won't guarantee that the next node will not override
+ *   the data (filling new/bytes and setting data_ready)
+ * - filling new/bytes with custom data won't guarantee that the next node
+ *   will not override that
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_preread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			    int bytes)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
+		if (n->track_preread)
+			if (!n->track_preread(vcpu, gpa, gva, bytes, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Notify the node that a write access is about to happen. Returning false
+ * doesn't stop the other nodes from being called, but it will stop
+ * the emulation.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_prewrite(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			     const u8 *new, int bytes)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
+		if (n->track_prewrite)
+			if (!n->track_prewrite(vcpu, gpa, gva, new, bytes, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is
  * finished at this time.
  *
- * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is
- * interested in by itself.
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
  */
 void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			  const u8 *new, int bytes)
@@ -251,12 +326,42 @@ void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Notify the node that an instruction is about to be executed.
+ * Returning false doesn't stop the other nodes from being called,
+ * but it will stop the emulation with X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_preexec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
+		if (n->track_preexec)
+			if (!n->track_preexec(vcpu, gpa, gva, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Notify the node that memory slot is being removed or moved so that it can
- * drop write-protection for the pages in the memory slot.
+ * drop active protection for the pages in the memory slot.
  *
- * The node should figure out it has any write-protected pages in this slot
- * by itself.
+ * The node should figure out if the page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
  */
 void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
 {
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-25  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 192+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-25  9:34 [PATCH v10 00/81] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 01/81] KVM: UAPI: add error codes used by the VM introspection code Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 02/81] KVM: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 03/81] KVM: add kvm_get_max_gfn() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 04/81] KVM: doc: fix the hypercalls numbering Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 05/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 06/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_regs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 07/81] KVM: x86: avoid injecting #PF when emulate the VMCALL instruction Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 08/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.bp_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 09/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_cr3_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 10/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.cr3_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 11/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.desc_ctrl_supported() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 12/81] KVM: svm: add support for descriptor-table VM-exits Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 13/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_desc_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 14/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.desc_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 15/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.msr_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 16/81] KVM: x86: svm: use the vmx convention to control the MSR interception Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 17/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_msr_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 18/81] KVM: x86: vmx: use a symbolic constant when checking the exit qualifications Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 19/81] KVM: x86: save the error code during EPT/NPF exits handling Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 20/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.fault_gla() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 21/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_singlestep() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 22/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 23/81] KVM: x86: extend kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_system() with the 'access' parameter Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 24/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_inject_pending_exception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 25/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 12:19   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:19     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:19     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:24   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 26/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 27/81] KVM: x86: page track: provide all callbacks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 28/81] KVM: x86: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2020-11-25  9:35   ` [PATCH v10 29/81] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 30/81] KVM: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 31/81] KVM: x86: disable gpa_available optimization for fetch and page-walk SPT violations Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 32/81] KVM: introduce VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 12:45   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:45     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:45     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:41   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:41     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:41     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 16:24   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 16:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 16:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 33/81] KVM: introspection: add hook/unhook ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 11:49   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 11:49     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 34/81] KVM: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 35/81] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 36/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 37/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 38/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 39/81] KVM: introspection: add KVM_INTROSPECTION_PREUNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 40/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 41/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 42/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_READ_PHYSICAL/KVMI_VM_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 43/81] KVM: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 44/81] KVM: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 45/81] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU introspection requests Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 46/81] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU commands Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 47/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 48/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 49/81] KVM: introspection: add support for vCPU events Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 50/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PAUSE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 51/81] KVM: introspection: add the crash action handling on the event reply Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 52/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 53/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 54/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 55/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 56/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 57/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 58/81] KVM: introspection: add cleanup support for vCPUs Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 59/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of #BP interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 60/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_CLEANUP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 61/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 62/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of CR3 interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 63/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 12:57   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:57     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 64/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_MAX_GFN Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 65/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 66/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XCR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 15:22   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 15:22     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 15:22     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 67/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 13:50   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:50     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 68/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 69/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 70/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 71/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of descriptor-table register interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 72/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 73/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of MSR interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 74/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 75/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 14:44   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 14:44     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 76/81] KVM: introspection: extend KVMI_GET_VERSION with struct kvmi_features Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 77/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 78/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 79/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_TRANSLATE_GVA Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 15:46   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 15:46     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 80/81] KVM: introspection: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:36 ` [PATCH v10 81/81] KVM: x86: call the page tracking code on emulation failure Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:36   ` Adalbert Lazăr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201125093600.2766-30-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.