From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, vireshk@kernel.org, cristian.marussi@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] scmi-cpufreq: Remove deferred probe Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:05:39 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210218103539.zkxhqxaivhifmjwj@vireshk-i7> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210215075139.30772-2-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> On 15-02-21, 07:51, Nicola Mazzucato wrote: > The current implementation of the scmi_cpufreq_init() function returns > -EPROBE_DEFER when the OPP table is not populated. In practice the > cpufreq core cannot handle this error code. > Therefore, fix the return value and clarify the error message. > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > index 491a0a24fb1e..34bf2eb8d465 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > @@ -155,9 +155,11 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev); > if (nr_opp <= 0) { > - dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "OPP table is not ready, deferring probe\n"); > - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; > - goto out_free_opp; Why change goto label as well ? > + dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: No OPPs for this device: %d\n", > + __func__, ret); > + > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto out_free_priv; > } > > priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > -- > 2.27.0 -- viresh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, vireshk@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cristian.marussi@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] scmi-cpufreq: Remove deferred probe Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:05:39 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210218103539.zkxhqxaivhifmjwj@vireshk-i7> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210215075139.30772-2-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> On 15-02-21, 07:51, Nicola Mazzucato wrote: > The current implementation of the scmi_cpufreq_init() function returns > -EPROBE_DEFER when the OPP table is not populated. In practice the > cpufreq core cannot handle this error code. > Therefore, fix the return value and clarify the error message. > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > index 491a0a24fb1e..34bf2eb8d465 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > @@ -155,9 +155,11 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev); > if (nr_opp <= 0) { > - dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "OPP table is not ready, deferring probe\n"); > - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; > - goto out_free_opp; Why change goto label as well ? > + dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: No OPPs for this device: %d\n", > + __func__, ret); > + > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto out_free_priv; > } > > priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > -- > 2.27.0 -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 12:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-15 7:51 [PATCH v7 0/3] CPUFreq: Add support for opp-sharing cpus Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-15 7:51 ` Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-15 7:51 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] scmi-cpufreq: Remove deferred probe Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-15 7:51 ` Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-18 10:35 ` Viresh Kumar [this message] 2021-02-18 10:35 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-02-18 13:01 ` Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-18 13:01 ` Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-15 7:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] scmi-cpufreq: Get opp_shared_cpus from opp-v2 for EM Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-15 7:51 ` Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-18 11:00 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-02-18 11:00 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-02-18 13:02 ` Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-18 13:02 ` Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-15 7:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] cpufreq: blacklist Arm Vexpress platforms in cpufreq-dt-platdev Nicola Mazzucato 2021-02-15 7:51 ` Nicola Mazzucato
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210218103539.zkxhqxaivhifmjwj@vireshk-i7 \ --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \ --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=nicola.mazzucato@arm.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.