All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
	Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
	Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stsp2@yandex.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 05/22] af_vsock: separate wait space loop
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:37:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325093736.h43s47ylrxcjd2qd@steredhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323131026.2460194-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:10:23PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This moves loop that waits for space on send to separate function,
>because it will be used for SEQ_BEGIN/SEQ_END sending before and
>after data transmission. Waiting for SEQ_BEGIN/SEQ_END is needed
>because such packets carries SEQPACKET header that couldn't be
>fragmented by credit mechanism, so to avoid it, sender waits until
>enough space will be ready.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>---
> include/net/af_vsock.h   |  2 +
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

I had already reviewed this one as well and it doesn't seem to have 
changed :-)

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

>
>diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>index 74ac8a4c4168..7232f6c42a36 100644
>--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>@@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ void vsock_remove_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> void vsock_for_each_connected_socket(void (*fn)(struct sock *sk));
> int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk);
> bool vsock_find_cid(unsigned int cid);
>+int vsock_wait_space(struct sock *sk, size_t space, int flags,
>+		     struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *send_data);
>
> /**** TAP ****/
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index fa0c37f97330..617ffe42693d 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -1692,6 +1692,65 @@ static int vsock_connectible_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>+int vsock_wait_space(struct sock *sk, size_t space, int flags,
>+		     struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *send_data)
>+{
>+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
>+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
>+	long timeout;
>+	int err;
>+
>+	DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>+
>+	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>+	transport = vsk->transport;
>+	timeout = sock_sndtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>+	err = 0;
>+
>+	add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>+
>+	while (vsock_stream_has_space(vsk) < space &&
>+	       sk->sk_err == 0 &&
>+	       !(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) &&
>+	       !(vsk->peer_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
>+
>+		/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
>+		if (timeout == 0) {
>+			err = -EAGAIN;
>+			goto out_err;
>+		}
>+
>+		if (send_data) {
>+			err = transport->notify_send_pre_block(vsk, send_data);
>+			if (err < 0)
>+				goto out_err;
>+		}
>+
>+		release_sock(sk);
>+		timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
>+		lock_sock(sk);
>+		if (signal_pending(current)) {
>+			err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
>+			goto out_err;
>+		} else if (timeout == 0) {
>+			err = -EAGAIN;
>+			goto out_err;
>+		}
>+	}
>+
>+	if (sk->sk_err) {
>+		err = -sk->sk_err;
>+	} else if ((sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) ||
>+		   (vsk->peer_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
>+		err = -EPIPE;
>+	}
>+
>+out_err:
>+	remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>+	return err;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_wait_space);
>+
> static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 				     size_t len)
> {
>@@ -1699,10 +1758,8 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> 	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
> 	ssize_t total_written;
>-	long timeout;
> 	int err;
> 	struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data send_data;
>-	DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>
> 	sk = sock->sk;
> 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>@@ -1740,9 +1797,6 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 		goto out;
> 	}
>
>-	/* Wait for room in the produce queue to enqueue our user's data. */
>-	timeout = sock_sndtimeo(sk, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>-
> 	err = transport->notify_send_init(vsk, &send_data);
> 	if (err < 0)
> 		goto out;
>@@ -1750,39 +1804,8 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 	while (total_written < len) {
> 		ssize_t written;
>
>-		add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-		while (vsock_stream_has_space(vsk) == 0 &&
>-		       sk->sk_err == 0 &&
>-		       !(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) &&
>-		       !(vsk->peer_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
>-
>-			/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
>-			if (timeout == 0) {
>-				err = -EAGAIN;
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			}
>-
>-			err = transport->notify_send_pre_block(vsk, &send_data);
>-			if (err < 0) {
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			}
>-
>-			release_sock(sk);
>-			timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
>-			lock_sock(sk);
>-			if (signal_pending(current)) {
>-				err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			} else if (timeout == 0) {
>-				err = -EAGAIN;
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			}
>-		}
>-		remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>+		if (vsock_wait_space(sk, 1, msg->msg_flags, &send_data))
>+			goto out_err;
>
> 		/* These checks occur both as part of and after the loop
> 		 * conditional since we need to check before and after
>-- 
>2.25.1
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Cc: Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, stsp2@yandex.ru,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, oxffffaa@gmail.com,
	Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>,
	Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 05/22] af_vsock: separate wait space loop
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:37:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325093736.h43s47ylrxcjd2qd@steredhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323131026.2460194-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:10:23PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This moves loop that waits for space on send to separate function,
>because it will be used for SEQ_BEGIN/SEQ_END sending before and
>after data transmission. Waiting for SEQ_BEGIN/SEQ_END is needed
>because such packets carries SEQPACKET header that couldn't be
>fragmented by credit mechanism, so to avoid it, sender waits until
>enough space will be ready.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>---
> include/net/af_vsock.h   |  2 +
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

I had already reviewed this one as well and it doesn't seem to have 
changed :-)

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

>
>diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>index 74ac8a4c4168..7232f6c42a36 100644
>--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>@@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ void vsock_remove_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> void vsock_for_each_connected_socket(void (*fn)(struct sock *sk));
> int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk);
> bool vsock_find_cid(unsigned int cid);
>+int vsock_wait_space(struct sock *sk, size_t space, int flags,
>+		     struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *send_data);
>
> /**** TAP ****/
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index fa0c37f97330..617ffe42693d 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -1692,6 +1692,65 @@ static int vsock_connectible_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>+int vsock_wait_space(struct sock *sk, size_t space, int flags,
>+		     struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *send_data)
>+{
>+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
>+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
>+	long timeout;
>+	int err;
>+
>+	DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>+
>+	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>+	transport = vsk->transport;
>+	timeout = sock_sndtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>+	err = 0;
>+
>+	add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>+
>+	while (vsock_stream_has_space(vsk) < space &&
>+	       sk->sk_err == 0 &&
>+	       !(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) &&
>+	       !(vsk->peer_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
>+
>+		/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
>+		if (timeout == 0) {
>+			err = -EAGAIN;
>+			goto out_err;
>+		}
>+
>+		if (send_data) {
>+			err = transport->notify_send_pre_block(vsk, send_data);
>+			if (err < 0)
>+				goto out_err;
>+		}
>+
>+		release_sock(sk);
>+		timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
>+		lock_sock(sk);
>+		if (signal_pending(current)) {
>+			err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
>+			goto out_err;
>+		} else if (timeout == 0) {
>+			err = -EAGAIN;
>+			goto out_err;
>+		}
>+	}
>+
>+	if (sk->sk_err) {
>+		err = -sk->sk_err;
>+	} else if ((sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) ||
>+		   (vsk->peer_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
>+		err = -EPIPE;
>+	}
>+
>+out_err:
>+	remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>+	return err;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_wait_space);
>+
> static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 				     size_t len)
> {
>@@ -1699,10 +1758,8 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> 	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
> 	ssize_t total_written;
>-	long timeout;
> 	int err;
> 	struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data send_data;
>-	DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>
> 	sk = sock->sk;
> 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>@@ -1740,9 +1797,6 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 		goto out;
> 	}
>
>-	/* Wait for room in the produce queue to enqueue our user's data. */
>-	timeout = sock_sndtimeo(sk, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>-
> 	err = transport->notify_send_init(vsk, &send_data);
> 	if (err < 0)
> 		goto out;
>@@ -1750,39 +1804,8 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 	while (total_written < len) {
> 		ssize_t written;
>
>-		add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-		while (vsock_stream_has_space(vsk) == 0 &&
>-		       sk->sk_err == 0 &&
>-		       !(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) &&
>-		       !(vsk->peer_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
>-
>-			/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
>-			if (timeout == 0) {
>-				err = -EAGAIN;
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			}
>-
>-			err = transport->notify_send_pre_block(vsk, &send_data);
>-			if (err < 0) {
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			}
>-
>-			release_sock(sk);
>-			timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
>-			lock_sock(sk);
>-			if (signal_pending(current)) {
>-				err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			} else if (timeout == 0) {
>-				err = -EAGAIN;
>-				remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>-				goto out_err;
>-			}
>-		}
>-		remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>+		if (vsock_wait_space(sk, 1, msg->msg_flags, &send_data))
>+			goto out_err;
>
> 		/* These checks occur both as part of and after the loop
> 		 * conditional since we need to check before and after
>-- 
>2.25.1
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23 13:07 [RFC PATCH v7 00/22] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/22] af_vsock: update functions for connectible socket Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/22] af_vsock: separate wait data loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/22] af_vsock: separate receive " Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25  9:06   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25  9:06     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-23 13:10 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/22] af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET receive loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25  9:34   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25  9:34     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:01     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:10 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/22] af_vsock: separate wait space loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25  9:37   ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2021-03-25  9:37     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-23 13:10 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/22] af_vsock: implement send logic for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25  9:42   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25  9:42     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-23 13:11 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/22] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:11 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/22] af_vsock: update comments for stream sockets Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:11 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/22] virtio/vsock: set packet's type in virtio_transport_send_pkt_info() Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/22] virtio/vsock: simplify credit update function API Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/22] virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25  9:56   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25  9:56     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:02     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/22] virtio/vsock: fetch length for SEQPACKET record Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:08   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:08     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:02     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:13 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/22] virtio/vsock: add SEQPACKET receive logic Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:09   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:09     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-23 13:13 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/22] virtio/vsock: rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:18   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:18     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:03     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:13 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/22] virtio/vsock: SEQPACKET support feature bit Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:26   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:26     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:04     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/22] virtio/vsock: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:39   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:39     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:04     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/22] vhost/vsock: " Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:42   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:42     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:04     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/22] vsock/loopback: " Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:48   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:48     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-23 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/22] vhost/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit support Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/22] virtio/vsock: " Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/22] vsock_test: add SOCK_SEQPACKET tests Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-23 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/22] virtio/vsock: update trace event for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-25 10:52 ` [RFC PATCH v7 00/22] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 10:52   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-03-25 16:05   ` Arseny Krasnov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210325093736.h43s47ylrxcjd2qd@steredhat \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
    --cc=andraprs@amazon.com \
    --cc=arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhansen@vmware.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nslusarek@gmx.net \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=stsp2@yandex.ru \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.