Re: [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_scmi: Updates for v5.17

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, ARM SoC Team <arm@kernel.org>,
	SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_scmi: Updates for v5.17
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:33:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208103327.hjld33z3lkfrpu6k@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1qcZHFpxdqF1AFSCGR+AyDrYmucdBQGz5G1PvnEMbp8Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:00:43AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 9:24 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:37:40AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:13:42PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > Hi ARM SoC Team,
> > > >
> > > > Please pull !
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am aware I sent this pull request just around the same time Arnd finalised
> > > the initial set. I have seen emails suggesting that Olof might be planning
> > > to merge additional PR, so it would be great if this gets included in
> > > that cut. All the changes are in -next since 21st December, so there should
> > > be no surprises.
> > >
> > > Thanks again and sorry for nagging.
> >
> > Yeah, no worries -- I'd been letting pull requests sitting for a while over the
> > holidays. I've merged this into our late branch now.
> 
> Hi Sudeep,
> 
> I'm going through all the stuff that we ended up not getting into v5.17.
> As you probably already know, this pull request was part of the arm/late
> branch that missed out, sorry for the mistake on our end.
>

No worries, it was indeed a late PR.

> As the contents are still fine, I could offer to either merge the branch again
> for v5.18, or I can drop it and wait for a new pull request from you, please
> let me know your preference.
>

Is it OK if I merge this tag with v5.17-rc1 as base and load it with any
new v5.18 material on the top ? I just want to avoid rebasing as the same time
some of the new material depend on these changes. Let me know if that
is fine. I am open to any other suggestions too.

> If any of the patches are bug fixes that you think should be in v5.17,
> it would be good to have a separate pull request or patch email for the
> 5.17 fixes branch.
>

Sure, I will check again, but AFAIK there were no fixes for existing bugs.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep