All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	ARM SoC Team <arm@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	 ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_scmi: Updates for v5.17
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:00:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1qcZHFpxdqF1AFSCGR+AyDrYmucdBQGz5G1PvnEMbp8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220108202410.GA1057@lx2k>

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 9:24 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:37:40AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:13:42PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Hi ARM SoC Team,
> > >
> > > Please pull !
> > >
> >
> > I am aware I sent this pull request just around the same time Arnd finalised
> > the initial set. I have seen emails suggesting that Olof might be planning
> > to merge additional PR, so it would be great if this gets included in
> > that cut. All the changes are in -next since 21st December, so there should
> > be no surprises.
> >
> > Thanks again and sorry for nagging.
>
> Yeah, no worries -- I'd been letting pull requests sitting for a while over the
> holidays. I've merged this into our late branch now.

Hi Sudeep,

I'm going through all the stuff that we ended up not getting into v5.17.
As you probably already know, this pull request was part of the arm/late
branch that missed out, sorry for the mistake on our end.

As the contents are still fine, I could offer to either merge the branch again
for v5.18, or I can drop it and wait for a new pull request from you, please
let me know your preference.

If any of the patches are bug fixes that you think should be in v5.17,
it would be good to have a separate pull request or patch email for the
5.17 fixes branch.

       Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	ARM SoC Team <arm@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_scmi: Updates for v5.17
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:00:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1qcZHFpxdqF1AFSCGR+AyDrYmucdBQGz5G1PvnEMbp8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220108202410.GA1057@lx2k>

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 9:24 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:37:40AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:13:42PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Hi ARM SoC Team,
> > >
> > > Please pull !
> > >
> >
> > I am aware I sent this pull request just around the same time Arnd finalised
> > the initial set. I have seen emails suggesting that Olof might be planning
> > to merge additional PR, so it would be great if this gets included in
> > that cut. All the changes are in -next since 21st December, so there should
> > be no surprises.
> >
> > Thanks again and sorry for nagging.
>
> Yeah, no worries -- I'd been letting pull requests sitting for a while over the
> holidays. I've merged this into our late branch now.

Hi Sudeep,

I'm going through all the stuff that we ended up not getting into v5.17.
As you probably already know, this pull request was part of the arm/late
branch that missed out, sorry for the mistake on our end.

As the contents are still fine, I could offer to either merge the branch again
for v5.18, or I can drop it and wait for a new pull request from you, please
let me know your preference.

If any of the patches are bug fixes that you think should be in v5.17,
it would be good to have a separate pull request or patch email for the
5.17 fixes branch.

       Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-22 14:13 [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_scmi: Updates for v5.17 Sudeep Holla
2021-12-22 14:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-01-07 11:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-01-07 11:37   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-01-08 20:24   ` Olof Johansson
2022-01-08 20:24     ` Olof Johansson
2022-02-08 10:00     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2022-02-08 10:00       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-08 10:33       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-02-08 10:33         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-02-08 11:14         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-08 11:14           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-08 11:34           ` Sudeep Holla
2022-02-08 11:34             ` Sudeep Holla
2022-01-08 22:00 ` patchwork-bot+linux-soc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a1qcZHFpxdqF1AFSCGR+AyDrYmucdBQGz5G1PvnEMbp8Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.