[PATCH v3 8/8] perf: arm_spe: Add support for SPEv1.2 inverted event filtering

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH v3 8/8] perf: arm_spe: Add support for SPEv1.2 inverted event filtering
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 10:55:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825-arm-spe-v8-7-v3-8-87682f78caac@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825-arm-spe-v8-7-v3-0-87682f78caac@kernel.org>

Arm SPEv1.2 (Arm v8.7/v9.2) adds a new feature called Inverted Event
Filter which excludes samples matching the event filter. The feature
mirrors the existing event filter in PMSEVFR_EL1 adding a new register,
PMSNEVFR_EL1, which has the same event bit assignments.

Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
v3:
 - No change
v2:
 - Update for auto generated register defines
 - Avoid accessing SYS_PMSNEVFR_EL1 on < v8.7
---
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index 82f67e941bc4..573db4211acd 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu {
 #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST			(1UL << 3)
 #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS			(1UL << 4)
 #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND			(1UL << 5)
+#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT		(1UL << 6)
 #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED			(1UL << 63)
 	u64					features;
 
@@ -202,6 +203,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_cap_group = {
 #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_LO		0
 #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_HI		11
 
+#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_CFG	config3	/* PMSNEVFR_EL1 */
+#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_LO	0
+#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_HI	63
+
 /* Why does everything I do descend into this? */
 #define __GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cfg, lo, hi)				\
 	(lo) == (hi) ? #cfg ":" #lo "\n" : #cfg ":" #lo "-" #hi
@@ -232,6 +237,7 @@ GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(branch_filter);
 GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(load_filter);
 GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(store_filter);
 GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event_filter);
+GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(inv_event_filter);
 GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(min_latency);
 
 static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
@@ -243,12 +249,27 @@ static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
 	&format_attr_load_filter.attr,
 	&format_attr_store_filter.attr,
 	&format_attr_event_filter.attr,
+	&format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr,
 	&format_attr_min_latency.attr,
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static umode_t arm_spe_pmu_format_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+						  struct attribute *attr,
+						  int unused)
+	{
+	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (attr == &format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr && !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT))
+		return 0;
+
+	return attr->mode;
+}
+
 static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_format_group = {
 	.name	= "format",
+	.is_visible = arm_spe_pmu_format_attr_is_visible,
 	.attrs	= arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr,
 };
 
@@ -343,6 +364,9 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsfcr(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, event_filter))
 		reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FE;
 
+	if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, inv_event_filter))
+		reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FnE;
+
 	if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, min_latency))
 		reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FL;
 
@@ -355,6 +379,12 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(struct perf_event *event)
 	return ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, event_filter);
 }
 
+static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
+	return ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, inv_event_filter);
+}
+
 static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmslatfr(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
@@ -703,6 +733,9 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
+	if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if (attr->exclude_idle)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -721,6 +754,10 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	    !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
+	if ((FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FnE, reg)) &&
+	    !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if ((FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FT, reg)) &&
 	    !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -756,6 +793,11 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 	reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event);
 	write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSEVFR_EL1);
 
+	if (spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT) {
+		reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(event);
+		write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSNEVFR_EL1);
+	}
+
 	reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmslatfr(event);
 	write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSLATFR_EL1);
 
@@ -990,6 +1032,9 @@ static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info)
 	if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FE, reg))
 		spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT;
 
+	if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FnE, reg))
+		spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT;
+
 	if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FT, reg))
 		spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP;
 

-- 
b4 0.11.0-dev
