From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT signal context location Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:06:57 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220829160703.874492-5-broonie@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220829160703.874492-1-broonie@kernel.org> Currently in validate_extra_context() we assert both that the extra data pointed to by the EXTRA_CONTEXT is 16 byte aligned and that it immediately follows the struct _aarch64_ctx providing the terminator for the linked list of contexts in the signal frame. Since struct _aarch64_ctx is an 8 byte structure which must be 16 byte aligned these cannot both be true. As documented in sigcontext.h and implemented by the kernel the extra data should be at the next 16 byte aligned address after the terminator so fix the validation to match. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c index d98828cb542b..16dc916939f9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ bool validate_extra_context(struct extra_context *extra, char **err) *err = "Extra DATAP misaligned"; else if (extra->size & 0x0fUL) *err = "Extra SIZE misaligned"; - else if (extra->datap != (uint64_t)term + sizeof(*term)) + else if (extra->datap != (uint64_t)term + 0x10UL) *err = "Extra DATAP misplaced (not contiguous)"; if (*err) return false; -- 2.30.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT signal context location Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:06:57 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220829160703.874492-5-broonie@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220829160703.874492-1-broonie@kernel.org> Currently in validate_extra_context() we assert both that the extra data pointed to by the EXTRA_CONTEXT is 16 byte aligned and that it immediately follows the struct _aarch64_ctx providing the terminator for the linked list of contexts in the signal frame. Since struct _aarch64_ctx is an 8 byte structure which must be 16 byte aligned these cannot both be true. As documented in sigcontext.h and implemented by the kernel the extra data should be at the next 16 byte aligned address after the terminator so fix the validation to match. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c index d98828cb542b..16dc916939f9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ bool validate_extra_context(struct extra_context *extra, char **err) *err = "Extra DATAP misaligned"; else if (extra->size & 0x0fUL) *err = "Extra SIZE misaligned"; - else if (extra->datap != (uint64_t)term + sizeof(*term)) + else if (extra->datap != (uint64_t)term + 0x10UL) *err = "Extra DATAP misplaced (not contiguous)"; if (*err) return false; -- 2.30.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 16:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-29 16:06 [PATCH v2 00/10] kselftest/arm64: EXTRA_CONTEXT related fixes Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] kselftest/arm64: Enumerate SME rather than SVE vector lengths for za_regs Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate signal ucontext in place Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validatation termination record after EXTRA_CONTEXT Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown [this message] 2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT signal context location Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] kselftest/arm64: Remove unneeded protype for validate_extra_context() Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] kselftest/arm64: Only validate each signal context once Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate contents of EXTRA_CONTEXT blocks Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] kselftest/arm64: Preserve any EXTRA_CONTEXT in handle_signal_copyctx() Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] kselftest/arm64: Allow larger buffers in get_signal_context() Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] kselftest/arm64: Include larger SVE and SME VLs in signal tests Mark Brown 2022-08-29 16:07 ` Mark Brown 2022-09-06 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] kselftest/arm64: EXTRA_CONTEXT related fixes Catalin Marinas 2022-09-06 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220829160703.874492-5-broonie@kernel.org \ --to=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.