All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] kselftest/arm64: Only validate each signal context once
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:06:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220829160703.874492-7-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220829160703.874492-1-broonie@kernel.org>

Currently for the more complex signal context types we validate the context
specific details the end of the parsing loop validate_reserved() if we've
ever seen a context of that type. This is currently merely a bit inefficient
but will get a bit awkward when we start parsing extra_context, at which
point we will need to reset the head to advance into the extra space that
extra_context provides. Instead only do the more detailed checks on each
context type the first time we see that context type.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 .../arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c        | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
index 16dc916939f9..0b3c9b4b1d39 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 	bool terminated = false;
 	size_t offs = 0;
 	int flags = 0;
+	int new_flags;
 	struct extra_context *extra = NULL;
 	struct sve_context *sve = NULL;
 	struct za_context *za = NULL;
@@ -120,6 +121,8 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			return false;
 		}
 
+		new_flags = 0;
+
 		switch (head->magic) {
 		case 0:
 			if (head->size)
@@ -133,7 +136,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			else if (head->size !=
 				 sizeof(struct fpsimd_context))
 				*err = "Bad size for fpsimd_context";
-			flags |= FPSIMD_CTX;
+			new_flags |= FPSIMD_CTX;
 			break;
 		case ESR_MAGIC:
 			if (head->size != sizeof(struct esr_context))
@@ -144,14 +147,14 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 				*err = "Multiple SVE_MAGIC";
 			/* Size is validated in validate_sve_context() */
 			sve = (struct sve_context *)head;
-			flags |= SVE_CTX;
+			new_flags |= SVE_CTX;
 			break;
 		case ZA_MAGIC:
 			if (flags & ZA_CTX)
 				*err = "Multiple ZA_MAGIC";
 			/* Size is validated in validate_za_context() */
 			za = (struct za_context *)head;
-			flags |= ZA_CTX;
+			new_flags |= ZA_CTX;
 			break;
 		case EXTRA_MAGIC:
 			if (flags & EXTRA_CTX)
@@ -159,7 +162,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			else if (head->size !=
 				 sizeof(struct extra_context))
 				*err = "Bad size for extra_context";
-			flags |= EXTRA_CTX;
+			new_flags |= EXTRA_CTX;
 			extra = (struct extra_context *)head;
 			break;
 		case KSFT_BAD_MAGIC:
@@ -192,16 +195,18 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			return false;
 		}
 
-		if (flags & EXTRA_CTX)
+		if (new_flags & EXTRA_CTX)
 			if (!validate_extra_context(extra, err))
 				return false;
-		if (flags & SVE_CTX)
+		if (new_flags & SVE_CTX)
 			if (!validate_sve_context(sve, err))
 				return false;
-		if (flags & ZA_CTX)
+		if (new_flags & ZA_CTX)
 			if (!validate_za_context(za, err))
 				return false;
 
+		flags |= new_flags;
+
 		head = GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head);
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] kselftest/arm64: Only validate each signal context once
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:06:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220829160703.874492-7-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220829160703.874492-1-broonie@kernel.org>

Currently for the more complex signal context types we validate the context
specific details the end of the parsing loop validate_reserved() if we've
ever seen a context of that type. This is currently merely a bit inefficient
but will get a bit awkward when we start parsing extra_context, at which
point we will need to reset the head to advance into the extra space that
extra_context provides. Instead only do the more detailed checks on each
context type the first time we see that context type.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 .../arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c        | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
index 16dc916939f9..0b3c9b4b1d39 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 	bool terminated = false;
 	size_t offs = 0;
 	int flags = 0;
+	int new_flags;
 	struct extra_context *extra = NULL;
 	struct sve_context *sve = NULL;
 	struct za_context *za = NULL;
@@ -120,6 +121,8 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			return false;
 		}
 
+		new_flags = 0;
+
 		switch (head->magic) {
 		case 0:
 			if (head->size)
@@ -133,7 +136,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			else if (head->size !=
 				 sizeof(struct fpsimd_context))
 				*err = "Bad size for fpsimd_context";
-			flags |= FPSIMD_CTX;
+			new_flags |= FPSIMD_CTX;
 			break;
 		case ESR_MAGIC:
 			if (head->size != sizeof(struct esr_context))
@@ -144,14 +147,14 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 				*err = "Multiple SVE_MAGIC";
 			/* Size is validated in validate_sve_context() */
 			sve = (struct sve_context *)head;
-			flags |= SVE_CTX;
+			new_flags |= SVE_CTX;
 			break;
 		case ZA_MAGIC:
 			if (flags & ZA_CTX)
 				*err = "Multiple ZA_MAGIC";
 			/* Size is validated in validate_za_context() */
 			za = (struct za_context *)head;
-			flags |= ZA_CTX;
+			new_flags |= ZA_CTX;
 			break;
 		case EXTRA_MAGIC:
 			if (flags & EXTRA_CTX)
@@ -159,7 +162,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			else if (head->size !=
 				 sizeof(struct extra_context))
 				*err = "Bad size for extra_context";
-			flags |= EXTRA_CTX;
+			new_flags |= EXTRA_CTX;
 			extra = (struct extra_context *)head;
 			break;
 		case KSFT_BAD_MAGIC:
@@ -192,16 +195,18 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
 			return false;
 		}
 
-		if (flags & EXTRA_CTX)
+		if (new_flags & EXTRA_CTX)
 			if (!validate_extra_context(extra, err))
 				return false;
-		if (flags & SVE_CTX)
+		if (new_flags & SVE_CTX)
 			if (!validate_sve_context(sve, err))
 				return false;
-		if (flags & ZA_CTX)
+		if (new_flags & ZA_CTX)
 			if (!validate_za_context(za, err))
 				return false;
 
+		flags |= new_flags;
+
 		head = GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head);
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29 16:06 [PATCH v2 00/10] kselftest/arm64: EXTRA_CONTEXT related fixes Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] kselftest/arm64: Enumerate SME rather than SVE vector lengths for za_regs Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate signal ucontext in place Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validatation termination record after EXTRA_CONTEXT Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT signal context location Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] kselftest/arm64: Remove unneeded protype for validate_extra_context() Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:06 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-08-29 16:06   ` [PATCH v2 06/10] kselftest/arm64: Only validate each signal context once Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate contents of EXTRA_CONTEXT blocks Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] kselftest/arm64: Preserve any EXTRA_CONTEXT in handle_signal_copyctx() Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] kselftest/arm64: Allow larger buffers in get_signal_context() Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] kselftest/arm64: Include larger SVE and SME VLs in signal tests Mark Brown
2022-08-29 16:07   ` Mark Brown
2022-09-06 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] kselftest/arm64: EXTRA_CONTEXT related fixes Catalin Marinas
2022-09-06 17:44   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220829160703.874492-7-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.