All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] block: store the holder kobject in bd_holder_disk
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:49:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101104927.GA13823@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd409996-e5e1-d7af-b31d-87db943eaa25@huaweicloud.com>

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:52:04AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>     	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&holder->list);
>> -	holder->bdev = bdev;
>>   	holder->refcnt = 1;
>> +	holder->holder_dir = kobject_get(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
>
> I wonder is this safe here, if kobject reference is 0 here and
> bd_holder_dir is about to be freed. Here in kobject_get, kref_get() will
> warn about uaf, and kobject_get will return a address that is about to
> be freed.

But how could the reference be 0 here?  The driver that calls
bd_link_disk_holder must have the block device open and thus hold a
reference to it.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	"yukuai \(C\)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 7/7] block: store the holder kobject in bd_holder_disk
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:49:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101104927.GA13823@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd409996-e5e1-d7af-b31d-87db943eaa25@huaweicloud.com>

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:52:04AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>     	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&holder->list);
>> -	holder->bdev = bdev;
>>   	holder->refcnt = 1;
>> +	holder->holder_dir = kobject_get(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
>
> I wonder is this safe here, if kobject reference is 0 here and
> bd_holder_dir is about to be freed. Here in kobject_get, kref_get() will
> warn about uaf, and kobject_get will return a address that is about to
> be freed.

But how could the reference be 0 here?  The driver that calls
bd_link_disk_holder must have the block device open and thus hold a
reference to it.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-30 15:31 fix delayed holder tracking v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: clear ->slave_dir when dropping the main slave_dir reference Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] dm: remove free_table_devices Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm: cleanup open_table_device Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] dm: cleanup close_table_device Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] dm: track per-add_disk holder relations in DM Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  2:08   ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-09  2:08     ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-09  8:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  8:26       ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-10 18:09       ` Mike Snitzer
2022-11-10 18:09         ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2022-11-10 19:48         ` Mike Snitzer
2022-11-10 19:48           ` Mike Snitzer
2022-11-12  6:23         ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-12  6:23           ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] block: remove delayed holder registration Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] block: store the holder kobject in bd_holder_disk Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-31  1:52   ` Yu Kuai
2022-10-31  1:52     ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 10:49     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-11-01 10:49       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 11:12       ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 11:12         ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 11:21         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 11:21           ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 11:28           ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 11:28             ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 13:18             ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 13:18               ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 13:29               ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 13:29                 ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221101104927.GA13823@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.