All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, "yukuai \(C\)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/7] dm: track per-add_disk holder relations in DM
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:48:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y21VlVHSisUaHJC5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y20+UNI0KV2VjUSi@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 10 2022 at  1:09P -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
 
> The concern for race aside:
> I am concerned that your redundant bd_link_disk_holder() (first in
> open_table_device and later in dm_setup_md_queue) will result in
> dangling refcount (e.g. increase of 2 when it should only be by 1) --
> given bd_link_disk_holder will gladly just bump its holder->refcnt if
> bd_find_holder_disk() returns an existing holder. This would occur if
> a DM table is already loaded (and DM device's gendisk exists) and a
> new DM table is being loaded.

Nevermind, dm_setup_md_queue should only ever be called once.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] dm: track per-add_disk holder relations in DM
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:48:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y21VlVHSisUaHJC5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y20+UNI0KV2VjUSi@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 10 2022 at  1:09P -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
 
> The concern for race aside:
> I am concerned that your redundant bd_link_disk_holder() (first in
> open_table_device and later in dm_setup_md_queue) will result in
> dangling refcount (e.g. increase of 2 when it should only be by 1) --
> given bd_link_disk_holder will gladly just bump its holder->refcnt if
> bd_find_holder_disk() returns an existing holder. This would occur if
> a DM table is already loaded (and DM device's gendisk exists) and a
> new DM table is being loaded.

Nevermind, dm_setup_md_queue should only ever be called once.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-10 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-30 15:31 fix delayed holder tracking v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: clear ->slave_dir when dropping the main slave_dir reference Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] dm: remove free_table_devices Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm: cleanup open_table_device Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] dm: cleanup close_table_device Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] dm: track per-add_disk holder relations in DM Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  2:08   ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-09  2:08     ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-09  8:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  8:26       ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-10 18:09       ` Mike Snitzer
2022-11-10 18:09         ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2022-11-10 19:48         ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2022-11-10 19:48           ` Mike Snitzer
2022-11-12  6:23         ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-12  6:23           ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] block: remove delayed holder registration Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] block: store the holder kobject in bd_holder_disk Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 15:31   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-31  1:52   ` Yu Kuai
2022-10-31  1:52     ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 10:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 10:49       ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 11:12       ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 11:12         ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 11:21         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 11:21           ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 11:28           ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 11:28             ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 13:18             ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 13:18               ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-01 13:29               ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 13:29                 ` [dm-devel] " Yu Kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y21VlVHSisUaHJC5@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.