From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the debug IPI Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:31:48 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230601143109.v9.4.I6d7f7d5fa0aa293c8c3374194947254b93114d37@changeid> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230601213440.2488667-1-dianders@chromium.org> From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> All current arm64 interrupt controllers have at least 8 IPIs. Currently we are only using 7 of them on arm64. Let's use the 8th one as a debug IPI. This uses the new "debug IPI" infrastructure which will try to allocate this IPI as an NMI/pseudo NMI if possible. Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> --- I could imagine that people object to using up the last free IPI on interrupt controllers with only 8 IPIs. However, it shouldn't be a big deal. If we later need an extra IPI, it shouldn't be too hard to combine some of the existing ones. Presumably we could just get rid of the "crash stop" IPI and have the normal "stop" IPI do the crash if "waiting_for_crash_ipi" is non-zero Changes in v9: - Add a warning if we don't have enough IPIs for the NMI IPI - Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI. - Update commit description Changes in v8: - debug_ipi_setup() and debug_ipi_teardown() no longer take cpu param arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index edd63894d61e..db019b49d3bd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ #include <trace/events/ipi.h> +#include "ipi_debug.h" + DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, cpu_number); EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_number); @@ -935,6 +937,8 @@ static void ipi_setup(int cpu) for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0); + + debug_ipi_setup(); } #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -947,6 +951,8 @@ static void ipi_teardown(int cpu) for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i); + + debug_ipi_teardown(); } #endif @@ -968,6 +974,11 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n) irq_set_status_flags(ipi_base + i, IRQ_HIDDEN); } + if (n > nr_ipi) + set_smp_debug_ipi(ipi_base + nr_ipi); + else + WARN(1, "Not enough IPIs for NMI IPI\n"); + ipi_irq_base = ipi_base; /* Setup the boot CPU immediately */ -- 2.41.0.rc2.161.g9c6817b8e7-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the debug IPI Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:31:48 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230601143109.v9.4.I6d7f7d5fa0aa293c8c3374194947254b93114d37@changeid> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230601213440.2488667-1-dianders@chromium.org> From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> All current arm64 interrupt controllers have at least 8 IPIs. Currently we are only using 7 of them on arm64. Let's use the 8th one as a debug IPI. This uses the new "debug IPI" infrastructure which will try to allocate this IPI as an NMI/pseudo NMI if possible. Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> --- I could imagine that people object to using up the last free IPI on interrupt controllers with only 8 IPIs. However, it shouldn't be a big deal. If we later need an extra IPI, it shouldn't be too hard to combine some of the existing ones. Presumably we could just get rid of the "crash stop" IPI and have the normal "stop" IPI do the crash if "waiting_for_crash_ipi" is non-zero Changes in v9: - Add a warning if we don't have enough IPIs for the NMI IPI - Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI. - Update commit description Changes in v8: - debug_ipi_setup() and debug_ipi_teardown() no longer take cpu param arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index edd63894d61e..db019b49d3bd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ #include <trace/events/ipi.h> +#include "ipi_debug.h" + DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, cpu_number); EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_number); @@ -935,6 +937,8 @@ static void ipi_setup(int cpu) for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0); + + debug_ipi_setup(); } #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -947,6 +951,8 @@ static void ipi_teardown(int cpu) for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i); + + debug_ipi_teardown(); } #endif @@ -968,6 +974,11 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n) irq_set_status_flags(ipi_base + i, IRQ_HIDDEN); } + if (n > nr_ipi) + set_smp_debug_ipi(ipi_base + nr_ipi); + else + WARN(1, "Not enough IPIs for NMI IPI\n"); + ipi_irq_base = ipi_base; /* Setup the boot CPU immediately */ -- 2.41.0.rc2.161.g9c6817b8e7-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 21:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-06-01 21:31 [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson 2023-08-07 9:50 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 9:50 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 11:22 ` Sumit Garg 2023-08-07 11:22 ` Sumit Garg 2023-08-07 13:25 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 13:25 ` Mark Rutland 2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson 2023-08-07 9:52 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 9:52 ` Mark Rutland 2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] arm64: Add framework for a debug IPI Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson 2023-08-07 10:12 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:12 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-21 22:16 ` Doug Anderson 2023-08-21 22:16 ` Doug Anderson 2023-08-22 6:42 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-22 6:42 ` Mark Rutland 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson [this message] 2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the " Douglas Anderson 2023-08-07 10:17 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:17 ` Mark Rutland 2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] arm64: ipi_debug: Add support for backtrace using " Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson 2023-08-07 10:23 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:23 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-22 0:06 ` Doug Anderson 2023-08-22 0:06 ` Doug Anderson 2023-08-22 6:35 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-22 6:35 ` Mark Rutland 2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] kgdb: Provide a stub kgdb_nmicallback() if !CONFIG_KGDB Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson 2023-06-15 18:14 ` Doug Anderson 2023-06-15 18:14 ` Doug Anderson 2023-06-26 14:30 ` Daniel Thompson 2023-06-26 14:30 ` Daniel Thompson 2023-08-07 10:27 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:27 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:29 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:29 ` Mark Rutland 2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] arm64: kgdb: Roundup cpus using the debug IPI Douglas Anderson 2023-06-01 21:31 ` Douglas Anderson 2023-08-07 10:28 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:28 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier 2023-08-07 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier 2023-08-07 10:54 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:54 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier 2023-08-07 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier 2023-08-07 11:13 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 11:13 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 15:24 ` Daniel Thompson 2023-08-07 15:24 ` Daniel Thompson 2023-08-07 16:04 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 16:04 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-08 11:17 ` Daniel Thompson 2023-08-08 11:17 ` Daniel Thompson 2023-06-02 5:19 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Sumit Garg 2023-06-02 5:19 ` Sumit Garg 2023-07-24 15:55 ` Doug Anderson 2023-08-07 10:41 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 10:41 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 12:46 ` Sumit Garg 2023-08-07 12:46 ` Sumit Garg 2023-08-07 14:43 ` Mark Rutland 2023-08-07 14:43 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20230601143109.v9.4.I6d7f7d5fa0aa293c8c3374194947254b93114d37@changeid \ --to=dianders@chromium.org \ --cc=ardb@kernel.org \ --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \ --cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \ --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \ --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \ --cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \ --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \ --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \ --cc=wens@csie.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.