All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/25] drm/dp_mst: Swap the order of checking root vs. non-root port BW limitations
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 22:26:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230914192659.757475-17-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914192659.757475-1-imre.deak@intel.com>

drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mgr() should check for BW limitation starting
from sink ports continuing towards the root port, so that drivers can
use the @failing_port returned to resolve a BW overallocation in an
ideal way. For instance from streams A,B,C in a topology A,B going
through @failing_port and C not going through it, a BW overallocation of
A,B due to a limit of the port must be resolved first before considering
the limits of other ports closer to the root port. This way can avoid
reducing the BW of stream C unnecessarily due to a BW limit closer to the
root port.

Based on the above swap the order of the BW check for the root port and
the check for all the ports downstream of it (the latter going through
the topology already in the sink->root port direction).

Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 3d93bc093c46c..f4b70ee3d715c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -5479,9 +5479,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc);
  *   - %-ENOSPC, if the new state is invalid, because of BW limitation
  *         @failing_port is set to:
  *         - The non-root port where a BW limit check failed
+ *           with all the ports downstream of @failing_port passing
+ *           the BW limit check.
  *           The returned port pointer is valid until at least
  *           one payload downstream of it exists.
  *         - %NULL if the BW limit check failed at the root port
+ *           with all the ports downstream of the root port passing
+ *           the BW limit check.
  *   - %-EINVAL, if the new state is invalid, because the root port has
  *     too many payloads.
  */
@@ -5497,17 +5501,16 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mgr(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
 	if (!mgr->mst_state)
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_payload_alloc_limits(mgr, mst_state);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
 	ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mstb_bw_limit(mgr->mst_primary,
 						    mst_state,
 						    failing_port);
 	mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
 
-	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_payload_alloc_limits(mgr, mst_state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mgr);
 
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 16/25] drm/dp_mst: Swap the order of checking root vs. non-root port BW limitations
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 22:26:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230914192659.757475-17-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914192659.757475-1-imre.deak@intel.com>

drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mgr() should check for BW limitation starting
from sink ports continuing towards the root port, so that drivers can
use the @failing_port returned to resolve a BW overallocation in an
ideal way. For instance from streams A,B,C in a topology A,B going
through @failing_port and C not going through it, a BW overallocation of
A,B due to a limit of the port must be resolved first before considering
the limits of other ports closer to the root port. This way can avoid
reducing the BW of stream C unnecessarily due to a BW limit closer to the
root port.

Based on the above swap the order of the BW check for the root port and
the check for all the ports downstream of it (the latter going through
the topology already in the sink->root port direction).

Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 3d93bc093c46c..f4b70ee3d715c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -5479,9 +5479,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc);
  *   - %-ENOSPC, if the new state is invalid, because of BW limitation
  *         @failing_port is set to:
  *         - The non-root port where a BW limit check failed
+ *           with all the ports downstream of @failing_port passing
+ *           the BW limit check.
  *           The returned port pointer is valid until at least
  *           one payload downstream of it exists.
  *         - %NULL if the BW limit check failed at the root port
+ *           with all the ports downstream of the root port passing
+ *           the BW limit check.
  *   - %-EINVAL, if the new state is invalid, because the root port has
  *     too many payloads.
  */
@@ -5497,17 +5501,16 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mgr(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
 	if (!mgr->mst_state)
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_payload_alloc_limits(mgr, mst_state);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
 	ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mstb_bw_limit(mgr->mst_primary,
 						    mst_state,
 						    failing_port);
 	mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
 
-	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_payload_alloc_limits(mgr, mst_state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mgr);
 
-- 
2.37.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-14 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-14 19:26 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/25] drm/i915: Improve BW management on shared display links Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/25] drm/i915/dp: Factor out helpers to compute the link limits Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/25] drm/i915/dp: Track the pipe and link bpp limits separately Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/25] drm/i915/dp: Skip computing a non-DSC link config if DSC is needed Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/25] drm/i915/dp: Update the link bpp limits for DSC mode Imre Deak
2023-09-19 14:48   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/25] drm/i915/dp: Limit the output link bpp in " Imre Deak
2023-09-19 14:49   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/25] drm/i915: Add helper to modeset a set of pipes Imre Deak
2023-09-15 18:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-15 20:03     ` Imre Deak
2023-09-18 18:25   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2023-09-19 14:25     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/25] drm/i915: During modeset forcing handle inactive but enabled pipes Imre Deak
2023-09-18 18:25   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 07/25] drm/i915: Rename intel_modeset_all_pipes() to intel_modeset_all_pipes_late() Imre Deak
2023-09-19 14:26     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/25] drm/i915: Factor out a helper to check/compute all the CRTC states Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/25] drm/i915: Add helpers for BW management on shared display links Imre Deak
2023-09-15  0:33   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Imre Deak
2023-09-15 19:11     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-15 21:01       ` Imre Deak
2023-09-18 18:25     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2023-09-19 15:21       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-19 17:40         ` Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/25] drm/i915/fdi: Improve FDI BW sharing between pipe B and C Imre Deak
2023-09-15 19:31   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-15 23:13     ` Imre Deak
2023-09-19 15:35       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-19 17:45         ` Imre Deak
2023-09-18 18:25   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/25] drm/i915/fdi: Recompute state for affected CRTCs on FDI links Imre Deak
2023-09-19 15:44   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-19 18:14     ` Imre Deak
2023-09-19 18:28       ` Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/25] drm/dp_mst: Fix fractional DSC bpp handling Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/25] drm/dp_mst: Add a way to calculate PBN values with FEC overhead Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26   ` Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/25] drm/dp_mst: Add helper to determine if an MST port is downstream of another port Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26   ` Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/25] drm/dp_mst: Factor out a helper to check the atomic state of a topology manager Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26   ` Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2023-09-14 19:26   ` [PATCH v3 16/25] drm/dp_mst: Swap the order of checking root vs. non-root port BW limitations Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 17/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix PBN calculation with FEC overhead Imre Deak
2023-09-20  9:09   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-20 10:58   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-20 11:35     ` Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 18/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Add atomic state for all streams on pre-tgl platforms Imre Deak
2023-09-20  9:11   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-20 10:59     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-20 11:25       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-20 12:38         ` Imre Deak
2023-09-20 13:56           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 19/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Program the DSC PPS SDP for each stream Imre Deak
2023-09-25  8:00   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 20/25] drm/i915/dp: Make sure the DSC PPS SDP is disabled whenever DSC is disabled Imre Deak
2023-09-25  7:56   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 21/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Enable DSC decompression if any stream needs this Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 22/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Add missing DSC compression disabling Imre Deak
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 23/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Allow DSC only for sink ports of the first branch device Imre Deak
2023-09-25  7:44   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 24/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Improve BW sharing between MST streams Imre Deak
2023-09-19 10:52   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2023-09-25  7:42     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-14 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 25/25] drm/i915/dp_mst: Check BW limitations only after all streams are computed Imre Deak
2023-09-25  7:54   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-09-14 23:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Improve BW management on shared display links (rev4) Patchwork
2023-09-15  4:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Improve BW management on shared display links (rev5) Patchwork
2023-09-15  4:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-09-15  4:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-15 12:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-19  1:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Improve BW management on shared display links (rev9) Patchwork
2023-09-19 11:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Improve BW management on shared display links (rev10) Patchwork
2023-09-19 11:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-09-19 11:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-19 13:29   ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230914192659.757475-17-imre.deak@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.