From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
"John Watts" <contact@jookia.org>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Aleksandr Shubin" <privatesub2@gmail.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"Maksim Kiselev" <bigunclemax@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Brandon Cheo Fusi" <fusibrandon13@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 23:04:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131125920.2879433-3-privatesub2@gmail.com>
Hi Aleksandr,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on sunxi/sunxi/for-next linus/master v6.8-rc2 next-20240202]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aleksandr-Shubin/dt-bindings-pwm-Add-binding-for-Allwinner-D1-T113-S3-R329-PWM-controller/20240131-210313
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131125920.2879433-3-privatesub2%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v8 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c:47: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
* SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
vim +47 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
45
46 /**
> 47 * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
48 * div_m (SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M) & prescale_k (SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K)
49 * without using a loop. These dividers limit the # of cycles in a period
50 * to SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE by applying a scaling factor of
51 * 1/(div_m * (prescale_k + 1)) to the clock source.
52 *
53 * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is derived by solving for div_m and prescale_k
54 * such that for a given requested period,
55 *
56 * i) div_m is minimized for any prescale_k ≤ SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX,
57 * ii) prescale_k is minimized.
58 *
59 * The derivation proceeds as follows, with val = # of cycles for reqested
60 * period:
61 *
62 * for a given value of div_m we want the smallest prescale_k such that
63 *
64 * (val >> div_m) // (prescale_k + 1) ≤ 65536 (SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE)
65 *
66 * This is equivalent to:
67 *
68 * (val >> div_m) ≤ 65536 * (prescale_k + 1) + prescale_k
69 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) ≤ 65537 * prescale_k + 65536
70 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 65537 * prescale_k
71 * ⟺ ((val >> div_m) - 65536) / 65537 ≤ prescale_k
72 *
73 * As prescale_k is integer, this becomes
74 *
75 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ prescale_k
76 *
77 * And is minimized at
78 *
79 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537
80 *
81 * Now we pick the smallest div_m that satifies prescale_k ≤ 255
82 * (i.e SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX),
83 *
84 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ 255
85 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 255 * 65537 + 65536
86 * ⟺ val >> div_m ≤ 255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536
87 * ⟺ val >> div_m < (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
88 * ⟺ div_m = fls((val) / (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1))
89 *
90 * Suggested by Uwe Kleine-König
91 */
92 #define SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
93
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"Aleksandr Shubin" <privatesub2@gmail.com>,
"Brandon Cheo Fusi" <fusibrandon13@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
"John Watts" <contact@jookia.org>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Maksim Kiselev" <bigunclemax@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 23:04:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131125920.2879433-3-privatesub2@gmail.com>
Hi Aleksandr,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on sunxi/sunxi/for-next linus/master v6.8-rc2 next-20240202]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aleksandr-Shubin/dt-bindings-pwm-Add-binding-for-Allwinner-D1-T113-S3-R329-PWM-controller/20240131-210313
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131125920.2879433-3-privatesub2%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v8 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c:47: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
* SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
vim +47 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
45
46 /**
> 47 * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
48 * div_m (SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M) & prescale_k (SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K)
49 * without using a loop. These dividers limit the # of cycles in a period
50 * to SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE by applying a scaling factor of
51 * 1/(div_m * (prescale_k + 1)) to the clock source.
52 *
53 * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is derived by solving for div_m and prescale_k
54 * such that for a given requested period,
55 *
56 * i) div_m is minimized for any prescale_k ≤ SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX,
57 * ii) prescale_k is minimized.
58 *
59 * The derivation proceeds as follows, with val = # of cycles for reqested
60 * period:
61 *
62 * for a given value of div_m we want the smallest prescale_k such that
63 *
64 * (val >> div_m) // (prescale_k + 1) ≤ 65536 (SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE)
65 *
66 * This is equivalent to:
67 *
68 * (val >> div_m) ≤ 65536 * (prescale_k + 1) + prescale_k
69 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) ≤ 65537 * prescale_k + 65536
70 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 65537 * prescale_k
71 * ⟺ ((val >> div_m) - 65536) / 65537 ≤ prescale_k
72 *
73 * As prescale_k is integer, this becomes
74 *
75 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ prescale_k
76 *
77 * And is minimized at
78 *
79 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537
80 *
81 * Now we pick the smallest div_m that satifies prescale_k ≤ 255
82 * (i.e SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX),
83 *
84 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ 255
85 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 255 * 65537 + 65536
86 * ⟺ val >> div_m ≤ 255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536
87 * ⟺ val >> div_m < (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
88 * ⟺ div_m = fls((val) / (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1))
89 *
90 * Suggested by Uwe Kleine-König
91 */
92 #define SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
93
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"Aleksandr Shubin" <privatesub2@gmail.com>,
"Brandon Cheo Fusi" <fusibrandon13@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
"John Watts" <contact@jookia.org>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Maksim Kiselev" <bigunclemax@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 23:04:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131125920.2879433-3-privatesub2@gmail.com>
Hi Aleksandr,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on sunxi/sunxi/for-next linus/master v6.8-rc2 next-20240202]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aleksandr-Shubin/dt-bindings-pwm-Add-binding-for-Allwinner-D1-T113-S3-R329-PWM-controller/20240131-210313
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131125920.2879433-3-privatesub2%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v8 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c:47: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
* SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
vim +47 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun20i.c
45
46 /**
> 47 * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is used to quickly compute the values of the clock dividers
48 * div_m (SUN20I_PWM_CLK_CFG_DIV_M) & prescale_k (SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K)
49 * without using a loop. These dividers limit the # of cycles in a period
50 * to SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE by applying a scaling factor of
51 * 1/(div_m * (prescale_k + 1)) to the clock source.
52 *
53 * SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC is derived by solving for div_m and prescale_k
54 * such that for a given requested period,
55 *
56 * i) div_m is minimized for any prescale_k ≤ SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX,
57 * ii) prescale_k is minimized.
58 *
59 * The derivation proceeds as follows, with val = # of cycles for reqested
60 * period:
61 *
62 * for a given value of div_m we want the smallest prescale_k such that
63 *
64 * (val >> div_m) // (prescale_k + 1) ≤ 65536 (SUN20I_PWM_PCNTR_SIZE)
65 *
66 * This is equivalent to:
67 *
68 * (val >> div_m) ≤ 65536 * (prescale_k + 1) + prescale_k
69 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) ≤ 65537 * prescale_k + 65536
70 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 65537 * prescale_k
71 * ⟺ ((val >> div_m) - 65536) / 65537 ≤ prescale_k
72 *
73 * As prescale_k is integer, this becomes
74 *
75 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ prescale_k
76 *
77 * And is minimized at
78 *
79 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537
80 *
81 * Now we pick the smallest div_m that satifies prescale_k ≤ 255
82 * (i.e SUN20I_PWM_CTL_PRESCAL_K_MAX),
83 *
84 * ((val >> div_m) - 65536) // 65537 ≤ 255
85 * ⟺ (val >> div_m) - 65536 ≤ 255 * 65537 + 65536
86 * ⟺ val >> div_m ≤ 255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536
87 * ⟺ val >> div_m < (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
88 * ⟺ div_m = fls((val) / (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1))
89 *
90 * Suggested by Uwe Kleine-König
91 */
92 #define SUN20I_PWM_MAGIC (255 * 65537 + 2 * 65536 + 1)
93
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-03 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 12:59 [PATCH v8 0/3] Add support for Allwinner PWM on D1/T113s/R329 SoCs Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add binding for Allwinner D1/T113-S3/R329 PWM controller Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 14:52 ` Andre Przywara
2024-01-31 14:52 ` Andre Przywara
2024-01-31 14:52 ` Andre Przywara
2024-01-31 21:22 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-31 21:22 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-31 21:22 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-01 17:48 ` Andre Przywara
2024-02-01 17:48 ` Andre Przywara
2024-02-01 17:48 ` Andre Przywara
2024-02-01 18:59 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-01 18:59 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-01 18:59 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-31 16:34 ` Maxim Kiselev
2024-01-31 16:34 ` Maxim Kiselev
2024-01-31 16:34 ` Maxim Kiselev
2024-05-09 20:32 ` Chris Morgan
2024-05-09 20:32 ` Chris Morgan
2024-05-09 20:32 ` Chris Morgan
2024-01-31 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] pwm: Add Allwinner's D1/T113-S3/R329 SoCs PWM support Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 13:41 ` Philipp Zabel
2024-01-31 13:41 ` Philipp Zabel
2024-01-31 13:41 ` Philipp Zabel
2024-02-01 8:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-01 8:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-01 8:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-02 17:32 ` Brandon Cheo Fusi
2024-02-02 17:32 ` Brandon Cheo Fusi
2024-02-02 17:32 ` Brandon Cheo Fusi
2024-02-03 15:04 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-02-03 15:04 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-03 15:04 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-01 5:42 ` John Watts
2024-05-01 5:42 ` John Watts
2024-05-01 5:42 ` John Watts
2024-01-31 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] riscv: dts: allwinner: d1: Add pwm node Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 12:59 ` Aleksandr Shubin
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Andre Przywara
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Andre Przywara
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402032222.BiIrD3g4-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bigunclemax@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=contact@jookia.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fusibrandon13@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=privatesub2@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.