All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	hsinyi@google.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/panel: Check for already prepared/enabled in drm_panel
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21041738-e23f-45bc-580b-4139c0cb87d9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523122802.2.I59b417d4c29151cc2eff053369ec4822b606f375@changeid>

Hi,

On 23/05/2023 21:27, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In a whole pile of panel drivers, we have code to make the
> prepare/unprepare/enable/disable callbacks behave as no-ops if they've
> already been called. It's silly to have this code duplicated
> everywhere. Add it to the core instead so that we can eventually
> delete it from all the drivers. Note: to get some idea of the
> duplicated code, try:
>    git grep 'if.*>prepared' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
>    git grep 'if.*>enabled' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
> 
> NOTE: arguably, the right thing to do here is actually to skip this
> patch and simply remove all the extra checks from the individual
> drivers. Perhaps the checks were needed at some point in time in the
> past but maybe they no longer are? Certainly as we continue
> transitioning over to "panel_bridge" then we expect there to be much
> less variety in how these calls are made. When we're called as part of
> the bridge chain, things should be pretty simple. In fact, there was
> some discussion in the past about these checks [1], including a
> discussion about whether the checks were needed and whether the calls
> ought to be refcounted. At the time, I decided not to mess with it
> because it felt too risky.
> 
> Looking closer at it now, I'm fairly certain that nothing in the
> existing codebase is expecting these calls to be refcounted. The only
> real question is whether someone is already doing something to ensure
> prepare()/unprepare() match and enabled()/disable() match. I would say
> that, even if there is something else ensuring that things match,
> there's enough complexity that adding an extra bool and an extra
> double-check here is a good idea. Let's add a drm_warn() to let people
> know that it's considered a minor error to take advantage of
> drm_panel's double-checking but we'll still make things work fine.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210416153909.v4.27.I502f2a92ddd36c3d28d014dd75e170c2d405a0a5@changeid
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   include/drm/drm_panel.h     | 14 +++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
> index f634371c717a..4e1c4e42575b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
> @@ -105,11 +105,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_remove);
>    */
>   int drm_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   {
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->prepare)
> -		return panel->funcs->prepare(panel);
> +	if (panel->prepared) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping prepare of already prepared panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->prepare) {
> +		ret = panel->funcs->prepare(panel);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	panel->prepared = true;
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -128,11 +139,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_prepare);
>    */
>   int drm_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   {
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->unprepare)
> -		return panel->funcs->unprepare(panel);
> +	if (!panel->prepared) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping unprepare of already unprepared panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->unprepare) {
> +		ret = panel->funcs->unprepare(panel);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	panel->prepared = false;
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -155,11 +177,17 @@ int drm_panel_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	if (panel->enabled) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping enable of already enabled panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->enable) {
>   		ret = panel->funcs->enable(panel);
>   		if (ret < 0)
>   			return ret;
>   	}
> +	panel->enabled = true;
>   
>   	ret = backlight_enable(panel->backlight);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -187,13 +215,22 @@ int drm_panel_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	if (!panel->enabled) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping disable of already disabled panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	ret = backlight_disable(panel->backlight);
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		DRM_DEV_INFO(panel->dev, "failed to disable backlight: %d\n",
>   			     ret);
>   
> -	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->disable)
> -		return panel->funcs->disable(panel);
> +	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->disable) {
> +		ret = panel->funcs->disable(panel);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	panel->enabled = false;
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_panel.h b/include/drm/drm_panel.h
> index 432fab2347eb..c6cf75909389 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_panel.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_panel.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,20 @@ struct drm_panel {
>   	 * the panel is powered up.
>   	 */
>   	bool prepare_prev_first;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @prepared:
> +	 *
> +	 * If true then the panel has been prepared.
> +	 */
> +	bool prepared;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @enabled:
> +	 *
> +	 * If true then the panel has been enabled.
> +	 */
> +	bool enabled;
>   };
>   
>   void drm_panel_init(struct drm_panel *panel, struct device *dev,

LGTM and let's cleanup the panel drivers

Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, hsinyi@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/panel: Check for already prepared/enabled in drm_panel
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21041738-e23f-45bc-580b-4139c0cb87d9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523122802.2.I59b417d4c29151cc2eff053369ec4822b606f375@changeid>

Hi,

On 23/05/2023 21:27, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In a whole pile of panel drivers, we have code to make the
> prepare/unprepare/enable/disable callbacks behave as no-ops if they've
> already been called. It's silly to have this code duplicated
> everywhere. Add it to the core instead so that we can eventually
> delete it from all the drivers. Note: to get some idea of the
> duplicated code, try:
>    git grep 'if.*>prepared' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
>    git grep 'if.*>enabled' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
> 
> NOTE: arguably, the right thing to do here is actually to skip this
> patch and simply remove all the extra checks from the individual
> drivers. Perhaps the checks were needed at some point in time in the
> past but maybe they no longer are? Certainly as we continue
> transitioning over to "panel_bridge" then we expect there to be much
> less variety in how these calls are made. When we're called as part of
> the bridge chain, things should be pretty simple. In fact, there was
> some discussion in the past about these checks [1], including a
> discussion about whether the checks were needed and whether the calls
> ought to be refcounted. At the time, I decided not to mess with it
> because it felt too risky.
> 
> Looking closer at it now, I'm fairly certain that nothing in the
> existing codebase is expecting these calls to be refcounted. The only
> real question is whether someone is already doing something to ensure
> prepare()/unprepare() match and enabled()/disable() match. I would say
> that, even if there is something else ensuring that things match,
> there's enough complexity that adding an extra bool and an extra
> double-check here is a good idea. Let's add a drm_warn() to let people
> know that it's considered a minor error to take advantage of
> drm_panel's double-checking but we'll still make things work fine.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210416153909.v4.27.I502f2a92ddd36c3d28d014dd75e170c2d405a0a5@changeid
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   include/drm/drm_panel.h     | 14 +++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
> index f634371c717a..4e1c4e42575b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
> @@ -105,11 +105,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_remove);
>    */
>   int drm_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   {
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->prepare)
> -		return panel->funcs->prepare(panel);
> +	if (panel->prepared) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping prepare of already prepared panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->prepare) {
> +		ret = panel->funcs->prepare(panel);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	panel->prepared = true;
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -128,11 +139,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_prepare);
>    */
>   int drm_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   {
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->unprepare)
> -		return panel->funcs->unprepare(panel);
> +	if (!panel->prepared) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping unprepare of already unprepared panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->unprepare) {
> +		ret = panel->funcs->unprepare(panel);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	panel->prepared = false;
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -155,11 +177,17 @@ int drm_panel_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	if (panel->enabled) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping enable of already enabled panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->enable) {
>   		ret = panel->funcs->enable(panel);
>   		if (ret < 0)
>   			return ret;
>   	}
> +	panel->enabled = true;
>   
>   	ret = backlight_enable(panel->backlight);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -187,13 +215,22 @@ int drm_panel_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	if (!panel)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	if (!panel->enabled) {
> +		dev_warn(panel->dev, "Skipping disable of already disabled panel\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	ret = backlight_disable(panel->backlight);
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		DRM_DEV_INFO(panel->dev, "failed to disable backlight: %d\n",
>   			     ret);
>   
> -	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->disable)
> -		return panel->funcs->disable(panel);
> +	if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->disable) {
> +		ret = panel->funcs->disable(panel);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	panel->enabled = false;
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_panel.h b/include/drm/drm_panel.h
> index 432fab2347eb..c6cf75909389 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_panel.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_panel.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,20 @@ struct drm_panel {
>   	 * the panel is powered up.
>   	 */
>   	bool prepare_prev_first;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @prepared:
> +	 *
> +	 * If true then the panel has been prepared.
> +	 */
> +	bool prepared;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @enabled:
> +	 *
> +	 * If true then the panel has been enabled.
> +	 */
> +	bool enabled;
>   };
>   
>   void drm_panel_init(struct drm_panel *panel, struct device *dev,

LGTM and let's cleanup the panel drivers

Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-23 19:27 [PATCH 0/9] drm/panel and i2c-hid: Allow panels and touchscreens to power sequence together Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: HID: i2c-hid: Add "panel" property to i2c-hid backed panels Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-30 15:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-30 15:34     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-30 16:52     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-30 16:52       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/panel: Check for already prepared/enabled in drm_panel Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-24  9:52   ` Neil Armstrong [this message]
2023-05-24  9:52     ` Neil Armstrong
2023-05-24 16:57     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-24 16:57       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-24 16:19   ` Chris Morgan
2023-05-24 16:19     ` Chris Morgan
2023-05-24 17:04     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-24 17:04       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/panel: Add a way for other devices to follow panel state Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] HID: i2c-hid: Switch to SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] HID: i2c-hid: Rearrange probe() to power things up later Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:27   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 23:27   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-23 23:27     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 13:01   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 13:01     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 6/9] HID: i2c-hid: Make suspend and resume into helper functions Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:28   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 7/9] HID: i2c-hid: Support being a panel follower Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:28   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-24  0:28   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24  0:28     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 15:37   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 15:37     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 17:29   ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-24 17:29     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 8/9] HID: i2c-hid: Do panel follower work on the system_wq Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:28   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-24  1:36   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24  1:36     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 18:56   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 18:56     ` kernel test robot
2023-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Link trogdor touchscreens to the panels Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 19:28   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/9] drm/panel and i2c-hid: Allow panels and touchscreens to power sequence together Dmitry Torokhov
2023-05-23 21:39   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2023-05-23 23:52   ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-23 23:52     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-26 19:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-26 19:29   ` Konrad Dybcio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21041738-e23f-45bc-580b-4139c0cb87d9@linaro.org \
    --to=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hsinyi@google.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.