From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-bcache <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT"
<linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: do not reassig ->bi_bdev when partition remapping
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:19:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22e0f687-3165-e9d1-e1bd-9769a11dc0ea@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210125181826.GA14957@lst.de>
On 1/25/21 11:18 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/25/21 11:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:03:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> Partition table entries are not in disk order.
>>>
>>> And the issue shows up with the series just up to the this patch,
>>> without any later patches?
>>
>> At that patch specifically. I bisected it, and then I double checked
>> by running the previous commit (boots fine), then apply this one, and
>> then I run into that error. So it should be 100% reliable.
>
> Ok, I have an idea. With EOD message you mean this printk, right:
>
> pr_info_ratelimited("attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
> "%s: rw=%d, want=%llu, limit=%llu\n",
> ...
>
> right?
Yep
--
Jens Axboe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-bcache <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
"open list:SOFTWARE RAID \(Multiple Disks\) SUPPORT"
<linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 05/10] block: do not reassig ->bi_bdev when partition remapping
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:19:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22e0f687-3165-e9d1-e1bd-9769a11dc0ea@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210125181826.GA14957@lst.de>
On 1/25/21 11:18 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/25/21 11:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:03:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> Partition table entries are not in disk order.
>>>
>>> And the issue shows up with the series just up to the this patch,
>>> without any later patches?
>>
>> At that patch specifically. I bisected it, and then I double checked
>> by running the previous commit (boots fine), then apply this one, and
>> then I run into that error. So it should be 100% reliable.
>
> Ok, I have an idea. With EOD message you mean this printk, right:
>
> pr_info_ratelimited("attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
> "%s: rw=%d, want=%llu, limit=%llu\n",
> ...
>
> right?
Yep
--
Jens Axboe
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-24 10:02 store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] brd: remove the end of device check in brd_do_bvec Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 13:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 13:51 ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] dcssblk: remove the end of device check in dcssblk_submit_bio Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 13:52 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 13:52 ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: store a block_device pointer in struct bio Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: simplify submit_bio_checks a bit Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 14:02 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 14:02 ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: do not reassig ->bi_bdev when partition remapping Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 17:53 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 17:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 17:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:55 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:57 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:03 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:03 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:03 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:13 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:15 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:15 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:15 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:18 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:19 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-01-25 18:19 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:19 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:21 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:31 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: use ->bi_bdev for bio based I/O accounting Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] blk-mq: use ->bi_bdev for " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: add a disk_uevent helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 14:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 14:14 ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: remove DISK_PITER_REVERSE Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: use an xarray for disk->part_tbl Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 16:24 ` store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) v2 Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 16:24 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22e0f687-3165-e9d1-e1bd-9769a11dc0ea@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.