All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) v2
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:24:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86dd18e9-43e9-efe5-8445-88952a95b5d8@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210124100241.1167849-1-hch@lst.de>

On 1/24/21 3:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> this series switches back from storing the gendisk + partno to storing
> a block_device pointer in struct bio.  The reason is two fold:  for one
> the new struct block_device actually is always available, removing the
> need to avoid originally.  Second the merge struct block_device is much
> more useful than the old one, as storing it avoids the need for looking
> up what used to be hd_struct during partition remapping and I/O
> accounting.

Applied for 5.12, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) v2
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:24:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86dd18e9-43e9-efe5-8445-88952a95b5d8@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210124100241.1167849-1-hch@lst.de>

On 1/24/21 3:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> this series switches back from storing the gendisk + partno to storing
> a block_device pointer in struct bio.  The reason is two fold:  for one
> the new struct block_device actually is always available, removing the
> need to avoid originally.  Second the merge struct block_device is much
> more useful than the old one, as storing it avoids the need for looking
> up what used to be hd_struct during partition remapping and I/O
> accounting.

Applied for 5.12, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-25 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-24 10:02 store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] brd: remove the end of device check in brd_do_bvec Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 13:51   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 13:51     ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] dcssblk: remove the end of device check in dcssblk_submit_bio Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 13:52   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 13:52     ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: store a block_device pointer in struct bio Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: simplify submit_bio_checks a bit Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 14:02   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 14:02     ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: do not reassig ->bi_bdev when partition remapping Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:53   ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 17:53     ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 17:53     ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 17:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:55       ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:55       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 17:57       ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:03         ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:03           ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:03           ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:13           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:13             ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:13             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:15             ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:15               ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:15               ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:18               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:18                 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:18                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:19                 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:19                   ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:19                   ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:21                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:21                     ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:21                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 18:31                     ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:31                       ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 18:31                       ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: use ->bi_bdev for bio based I/O accounting Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] blk-mq: use ->bi_bdev for " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: add a disk_uevent helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 14:14   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-25 14:14     ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: remove DISK_PITER_REVERSE Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: use an xarray for disk->part_tbl Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-24 10:02   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 16:24 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-01-25 16:24   ` [dm-devel] store a pointer to the block_device in struct bio (again) v2 Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86dd18e9-43e9-efe5-8445-88952a95b5d8@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.