From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:02:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e16e5dc-d040-8e8d-0fda-eb631b4b72e1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826145247.10029-23-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Hi,
On 8/26/20 7:52 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/security/lsm.rst b/Documentation/security/lsm.rst
> index 6a2a2e973080..fd4c87358d54 100644
> --- a/Documentation/security/lsm.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/security/lsm.rst
> @@ -129,3 +129,31 @@ to identify it as the first security module to be registered.
> The capabilities security module does not use the general security
> blobs, unlike other modules. The reasons are historical and are
> based on overhead, complexity and performance concerns.
> +
> +LSM External Interfaces
> +=======================
> +
> +The LSM infrastructure does not generally provide external interfaces.
> +The individual security modules provide what external interfaces they
> +require.
> +
> +The file ``/sys/kernel/security/lsm`` provides a comma
> +separated list of the active security modules.
> +
> +The file ``/proc/pid/attr/display`` contains the name of the security
> +module for which the ``/proc/pid/attr/current`` interface will
> +apply. This interface can be written to.
> +
> +The infrastructure does provide an interface for the special
> +case where multiple security modules provide a process context.
> +This is provided in compound context format.
> +
> +- `lsm\0value\0lsm\0value\0`
> +
> +The `lsm` and `value` fields are nul terminated bytestrings.
Preferably NUL-terminated
> +Each field may contain whitespace or non-printable characters.
> +The nul bytes are included in the size of a compound context.
NUL
> +The context ``Bell\0Secret\0Biba\0Loose\0`` has a size of 23.
> +
> +The file ``/proc/pid/attr/context`` provides the security
> +context of the identified process.
thanks.
--
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:02:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e16e5dc-d040-8e8d-0fda-eb631b4b72e1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826145247.10029-23-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Hi,
On 8/26/20 7:52 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/security/lsm.rst b/Documentation/security/lsm.rst
> index 6a2a2e973080..fd4c87358d54 100644
> --- a/Documentation/security/lsm.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/security/lsm.rst
> @@ -129,3 +129,31 @@ to identify it as the first security module to be registered.
> The capabilities security module does not use the general security
> blobs, unlike other modules. The reasons are historical and are
> based on overhead, complexity and performance concerns.
> +
> +LSM External Interfaces
> +=======================
> +
> +The LSM infrastructure does not generally provide external interfaces.
> +The individual security modules provide what external interfaces they
> +require.
> +
> +The file ``/sys/kernel/security/lsm`` provides a comma
> +separated list of the active security modules.
> +
> +The file ``/proc/pid/attr/display`` contains the name of the security
> +module for which the ``/proc/pid/attr/current`` interface will
> +apply. This interface can be written to.
> +
> +The infrastructure does provide an interface for the special
> +case where multiple security modules provide a process context.
> +This is provided in compound context format.
> +
> +- `lsm\0value\0lsm\0value\0`
> +
> +The `lsm` and `value` fields are nul terminated bytestrings.
Preferably NUL-terminated
> +Each field may contain whitespace or non-printable characters.
> +The nul bytes are included in the size of a compound context.
NUL
> +The context ``Bell\0Secret\0Biba\0Loose\0`` has a size of 23.
> +
> +The file ``/proc/pid/attr/context`` provides the security
> +context of the identified process.
thanks.
--
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200826145247.10029-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:50 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 21:50 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 18:53 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 18:53 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 19:46 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 19:46 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-03 16:28 ` James Morris
2020-09-03 16:28 ` James Morris
2020-09-04 20:08 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 20:08 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 21:35 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:35 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:53 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 21:53 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 23:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 23:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:25 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-05 13:25 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-05 18:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 18:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 19:05 ` John Johansen
2020-09-05 19:05 ` John Johansen
2020-09-08 1:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-08 1:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-08 13:35 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-08 13:35 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-08 23:37 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-08 23:37 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-09 0:21 ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 0:21 ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 13:19 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-09 13:19 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-09-09 18:19 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-09 18:19 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-09 18:33 ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 18:33 ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 18:47 ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 18:47 ` John Johansen
2020-09-10 14:11 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-10 14:11 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-09 0:17 ` John Johansen
2020-09-09 0:17 ` John Johansen
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 06/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:29 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 21:29 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-04 21:59 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-04 21:59 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:12 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-05 13:12 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:18 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-05 13:18 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-05 13:20 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-05 13:20 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06 2:28 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 2:28 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 13/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06 2:45 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 2:45 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06 2:55 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 2:55 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06 3:11 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 3:11 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-08 10:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-09-08 10:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06 3:27 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 3:27 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 19/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-06 3:30 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 3:30 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 20/23] Audit: Add new record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-09-03 16:32 ` James Morris
2020-09-03 16:32 ` James Morris
2020-09-03 17:00 ` John Johansen
2020-09-03 17:00 ` John Johansen
2020-09-03 21:49 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-03 21:49 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 16:32 ` Paul Moore
2020-09-06 16:32 ` Paul Moore
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 21/23] Audit: Add a new record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 18:02 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2020-08-26 18:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-08-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v20 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 14:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 15:27 ` [PATCH v20 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-08-26 15:27 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e16e5dc-d040-8e8d-0fda-eb631b4b72e1@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.