Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3] qemu: Add virtio pmem device

From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Eric Blake <eblake-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kwolf-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org,
	xiaoguangrong eric
	<xiaoguangrong.eric-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	riel-ebMLmSuQjDVBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nvdimm-y27Ovi1pjclAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	david-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	ross zwisler
	<ross.zwisler-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
	imammedo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	stefanha-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	niteshnarayanlal-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	lcapitulino-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	nilal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3] qemu: Add virtio pmem device
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:47:29 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4226742.54063347.1532522849803.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3fe397a-024d-faf7-8854-bb8e9ea17f53-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

> 
> >>
> >> This patch has no n/M in the subject line; but is included in a thread
> >> that also has a 0/2 cover letter, as well as 1/2 and 2/2 patches in
> >> separate mails.  Is that intentional?
> > 
> > Yes, kernel series has 0-2 patches and Qemu has this one. I thought its
> > good to keep separate numbering for both the sets.
> 
> Ah, that makes sense. The cover letter didn't make it obvious to me that
> this was two separate series to two projects, but related enough that
> both series have to be incorporated for the feature to work and thus
> cross-posted under a single cover letter.

Will try to make it more clear in next posting.

Thanks,
Pankaj