All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework​
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 20:56:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45ce3129-4a9e-54d2-e594-49b451571842@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509172606.29387-1-david@lechnology.com>

Hi David,

On Wednesday 09 May 2018 10:55 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> This series converts mach-davinci to use the common clock framework.
> 
> The series works like this, the first 3 patches fix some issues with the clock
> drivers that have already been accepted into the mainline kernel.

I have not yet looked at the patches, but I got a bunch of W=1 warnings 
and some sparse warnings when building your branch. Please take a look 
at these. Unfortunately the output is mixed between sparse and compiler.
The "expression using sizeof(void)" can be ignored as its a known issue
with sparse, I believe.

Thanks,
Sekhar

drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da830.c:39:5: warning: symbol 'da830_pll_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:142:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void)
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:142:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void)
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da850.c:87:5: warning: symbol 'da850_pll0_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da830.c:39:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘da830_pll_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int da830_pll_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da850.c:87:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘da850_pll0_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int da850_pll0_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm355.c:30:5: warning: symbol 'dm355_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:59:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:122:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_pll2_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c:581: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'da8xx_cfgchip_register_usb1_clk48'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm646x.c:32:5: warning: symbol 'dm646x_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm644x.c:30:5: warning: symbol 'dm644x_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:59:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm365_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:122:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm365_pll2_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_pll2_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm355.c:30:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm355_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm355_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:310:5: warning: symbol 'davinci_clk_reset_assert' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:316:5: warning: symbol 'davinci_clk_reset_deassert' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm644x.c:66:5: warning: symbol 'dm644x_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:71:5: warning: symbol 'dm355_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm646x.c:32:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm646x_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm646x_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm365.c:76:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm646x.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'dm646x_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm644x.c:30:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm644x_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm644x_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:71:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm355_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm355_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:15:0:
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:26:14: warning: ‘mcbsp0_clkdev’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
 LPSC_CLKDEV1(mcbsp0_clkdev,  NULL,  "davinci-mcbsp.0");
              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h:31:46: note: in definition of macro ‘LPSC_CLKDEV1’
 static const struct davinci_lpsc_clkdev_info n[] __initconst = { \
                                              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:21:14: warning: ‘mcbsp1_clkdev’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
 LPSC_CLKDEV1(mcbsp1_clkdev,  NULL,  "davinci-mcbsp.1");
              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h:31:46: note: in definition of macro ‘LPSC_CLKDEV1’
 static const struct davinci_lpsc_clkdev_info n[] __initconst = { \
                                              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm365.c:76:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm365_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm646x.c:61:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm646x_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm646x_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm644x.c:66:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm644x_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm644x_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:496: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_auxclk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:310:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘davinci_clk_reset_assert’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int davinci_clk_reset_assert(struct clk *clk)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:316:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘davinci_clk_reset_deassert’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int davinci_clk_reset_deassert(struct clk *clk)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:509: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_sysclkbp_clk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:524: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_obsclk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:605: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_sysclk_register'

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework​
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 20:56:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45ce3129-4a9e-54d2-e594-49b451571842@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509172606.29387-1-david@lechnology.com>

Hi David,

On Wednesday 09 May 2018 10:55 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> This series converts mach-davinci to use the common clock framework.
> 
> The series works like this, the first 3 patches fix some issues with the clock
> drivers that have already been accepted into the mainline kernel.

I have not yet looked at the patches, but I got a bunch of W=1 warnings 
and some sparse warnings when building your branch. Please take a look 
at these. Unfortunately the output is mixed between sparse and compiler.
The "expression using sizeof(void)" can be ignored as its a known issue
with sparse, I believe.

Thanks,
Sekhar

drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da830.c:39:5: warning: symbol 'da830_pll_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:142:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void)
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:142:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void)
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da850.c:87:5: warning: symbol 'da850_pll0_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da830.c:39:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘da830_pll_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int da830_pll_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da850.c:87:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘da850_pll0_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int da850_pll0_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm355.c:30:5: warning: symbol 'dm355_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:59:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:122:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_pll2_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c:581: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'da8xx_cfgchip_register_usb1_clk48'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm646x.c:32:5: warning: symbol 'dm646x_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm644x.c:30:5: warning: symbol 'dm644x_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:59:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm365_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:122:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm365_pll2_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_pll2_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm355.c:30:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm355_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm355_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:310:5: warning: symbol 'davinci_clk_reset_assert' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:316:5: warning: symbol 'davinci_clk_reset_deassert' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm644x.c:66:5: warning: symbol 'dm644x_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:71:5: warning: symbol 'dm355_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm646x.c:32:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm646x_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm646x_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm365.c:76:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm646x.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'dm646x_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm644x.c:30:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm644x_pll1_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm644x_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:71:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm355_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm355_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:15:0:
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:26:14: warning: ‘mcbsp0_clkdev’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
 LPSC_CLKDEV1(mcbsp0_clkdev,  NULL,  "davinci-mcbsp.0");
              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h:31:46: note: in definition of macro ‘LPSC_CLKDEV1’
 static const struct davinci_lpsc_clkdev_info n[] __initconst = { \
                                              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:21:14: warning: ‘mcbsp1_clkdev’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
 LPSC_CLKDEV1(mcbsp1_clkdev,  NULL,  "davinci-mcbsp.1");
              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h:31:46: note: in definition of macro ‘LPSC_CLKDEV1’
 static const struct davinci_lpsc_clkdev_info n[] __initconst = { \
                                              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm365.c:76:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm365_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm646x.c:61:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm646x_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm646x_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm644x.c:66:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dm644x_psc_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm644x_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:496: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_auxclk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:310:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘davinci_clk_reset_assert’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int davinci_clk_reset_assert(struct clk *clk)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:316:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘davinci_clk_reset_deassert’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int davinci_clk_reset_deassert(struct clk *clk)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:509: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_sysclkbp_clk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:524: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_obsclk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:605: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_sysclk_register'

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework​
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 20:56:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45ce3129-4a9e-54d2-e594-49b451571842@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509172606.29387-1-david@lechnology.com>

Hi David,

On Wednesday 09 May 2018 10:55 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> This series converts mach-davinci to use the common clock framework.
> 
> The series works like this, the first 3 patches fix some issues with the clock
> drivers that have already been accepted into the mainline kernel.

I have not yet looked at the patches, but I got a bunch of W=1 warnings 
and some sparse warnings when building your branch. Please take a look 
at these. Unfortunately the output is mixed between sparse and compiler.
The "expression using sizeof(void)" can be ignored as its a known issue
with sparse, I believe.

Thanks,
Sekhar

drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da830.c:39:5: warning: symbol 'da830_pll_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:142:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void)
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:142:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void)
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da850.c:87:5: warning: symbol 'da850_pll0_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da830.c:39:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?da830_pll_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int da830_pll_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da850.c:87:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?da850_pll0_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int da850_pll0_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm355.c:30:5: warning: symbol 'dm355_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:59:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:122:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_pll2_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c:581: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'da8xx_cfgchip_register_usb1_clk48'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm646x.c:32:5: warning: symbol 'dm646x_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm644x.c:30:5: warning: symbol 'dm644x_pll1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:59:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm365_pll1_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c:122:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm365_pll2_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_pll2_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm355.c:30:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm355_pll1_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm355_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:310:5: warning: symbol 'davinci_clk_reset_assert' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:316:5: warning: symbol 'davinci_clk_reset_deassert' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm644x.c:66:5: warning: symbol 'dm644x_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:71:5: warning: symbol 'dm355_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm646x.c:32:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm646x_pll1_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm646x_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm365.c:76:5: warning: symbol 'dm365_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm646x.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'dm646x_psc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm644x.c:30:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm644x_pll1_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm644x_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:71:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm355_psc_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm355_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:15:0:
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:26:14: warning: ?mcbsp0_clkdev? defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
 LPSC_CLKDEV1(mcbsp0_clkdev,  NULL,  "davinci-mcbsp.0");
              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h:31:46: note: in definition of macro ?LPSC_CLKDEV1?
 static const struct davinci_lpsc_clkdev_info n[] __initconst = { \
                                              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c:21:14: warning: ?mcbsp1_clkdev? defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
 LPSC_CLKDEV1(mcbsp1_clkdev,  NULL,  "davinci-mcbsp.1");
              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h:31:46: note: in definition of macro ?LPSC_CLKDEV1?
 static const struct davinci_lpsc_clkdev_info n[] __initconst = { \
                                              ^
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm365.c:76:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm365_psc_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm365_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm646x.c:61:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm646x_psc_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm646x_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm644x.c:66:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?dm644x_psc_init? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int dm644x_psc_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:496: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_auxclk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:310:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?davinci_clk_reset_assert? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int davinci_clk_reset_assert(struct clk *clk)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c:316:5: warning: no previous prototype for ?davinci_clk_reset_deassert? [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int davinci_clk_reset_deassert(struct clk *clk)
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:509: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_sysclkbp_clk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:524: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_obsclk_register'
drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c:605: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'davinci_pll_sysclk_register'

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-11 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-09 17:25 [PATCH v10 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework​ David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 01/27] clk: davinci: pll: allow dev == NULL David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 02/27] clk: davinci: da850-pll: change PLL0 to CLK_OF_DECLARE David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-15 13:31   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-15 13:31     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-15 13:31     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-15 15:42     ` David Lechner
2018-05-15 15:42       ` David Lechner
2018-05-16  5:51       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-16  5:51         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-16  5:51         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 03/27] clk: davinci: psc: allow for dev == NULL David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-15 13:42   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-15 13:42     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-15 13:42     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 04/27] ARM: davinci: pass clock as parameter to davinci_timer_init() David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 05/27] ARM: davinci: da830: add new clock init using common clock framework David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 06/27] ARM: davinci: da850: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 07/27] ARM: davinci: dm355: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 08/27] ARM: davinci: dm365: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 09/27] ARM: davinci: dm644x: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 10/27] ARM: davinci: dm646x: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 11/27] ARM: davinci: da8xx: add new USB PHY " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 12/27] ARM: davinci: da8xx: add new sata_refclk " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 13/27] ARM: davinci: remove CONFIG_DAVINCI_RESET_CLOCKS David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 14/27] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 15/27] ARM: davinci: switch to common clock framework David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 16/27] ARM: davinci: da830: Remove legacy clock init David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 17/27] ARM: davinci: da850: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 18/27] ARM: davinci: dm355: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 19/27] ARM: davinci: dm365: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25 ` [PATCH v10 20/27] ARM: davinci: dm644x: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:25   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26 ` [PATCH v10 21/27] ARM: davinci: dm646x: " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26 ` [PATCH v10 22/27] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Remove legacy USB and SATA " David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26 ` [PATCH v10 23/27] ARM: davinci: remove legacy clocks David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26 ` [PATCH v10 24/27] dt-bindings: timer: new bindings for TI DaVinci timer David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26   ` David Lechner
2018-05-18 14:24   ` Rob Herring
2018-05-18 14:24     ` Rob Herring
2018-05-09 17:26 ` [PATCH v10 25/27] ARM: davinci: add device tree support to timer David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26   ` David Lechner
2018-05-17 14:35   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-17 14:35     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-17 14:35     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-17 15:09     ` David Lechner
2018-05-17 15:09       ` David Lechner
2018-05-18  6:05       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-18  6:05         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-18  6:05         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-18 15:35         ` David Lechner
2018-05-18 15:35           ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26 ` [PATCH v10 26/27] ARM: davinci: da8xx-dt: switch to device tree clocks David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26   ` David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26 ` [PATCH v10 27/27] ARM: dts: da850: Add clocks David Lechner
2018-05-09 17:26   ` David Lechner
2018-05-11 15:26 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2018-05-11 15:26   ` [PATCH v10 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework​ Sekhar Nori
2018-05-11 15:26   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-12 21:11   ` David Lechner
2018-05-12 21:11     ` David Lechner
2018-05-14  0:40 ` Adam Ford
2018-05-14  0:40   ` Adam Ford
2018-05-14  1:50   ` David Lechner
2018-05-14  1:50     ` David Lechner
2018-05-15  9:25   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-05-15  9:25     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-05-15 22:44     ` Adam Ford
2018-05-15 22:44       ` Adam Ford
2018-05-16  0:31       ` David Lechner
2018-05-16  0:31         ` David Lechner
2018-05-16  7:47       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-05-16  7:47         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-05-16 10:43         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-16 10:43           ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-17  0:46 ` Adam Ford
2018-05-17  0:46   ` Adam Ford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45ce3129-4a9e-54d2-e594-49b451571842@ti.com \
    --to=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=aford173@gmail.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.