From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> To: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, "ming.lei@canonical.com" <ming.lei@canonical.com>, "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Marc Dietich <marvin24@gmx.de>, "stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Chen Peter-B29397 <B29397@freescale.com>, "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: ehci: make HC see up-to-date qh/qtd descriptor ASAP Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:50:58 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4E60A702.1060504@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B327A383@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> On 01/09/11 20:08, Stephen Warren wrote: > Marc Dietich wrote at Thursday, September 01, 2011 5:14 AM: >> I'll add Stephen Warren from NVIDIA to the CC list. He has more HW to test on. > > Here are the results I found: > > Harmony: > Tegra USB3 -> SMSC9514 hub: NOT affected > (Unplugging LAN cable, or disabling SMSC9514 LAN driver doesn't change this) > > Seaboard (springbank; clamshell): > Tegra USB1 -> no hub: Affected > > Seaboard (seaboard non-clamshell): > Tegra USB1 -> no hub: Affected > Tegra USB3 -> no hub: Affected > > TrimSlice: > Tegra USB3 -> unknown hub: Affected > > This implies there's something different about Harmony. > > Is the USB hub a clue? Seaboard doesn't have one, and although I don't > know what model TrimSlice uses, I assume it's different since I know > TrimSlice's Ethernet is not the same as Harmony's. Panda has the exact same USB hub configuration, and is affected. So we can rule this out. > I don't see anything in board-harmony.c vs. board-seaboard.c that'd affect > anything USB-related. > > Perhaps there's some kind of bootloader or BCT difference. However, my > Harmony and both Seaboards both use (a very old) U-Boot and BCT from > ChromeOS, so I don't imagine there's actually much difference there. I just noticed something else. Harmony is fast *most of the time*. In about one in 3 reboots, I get the slow behavior. When USB is fast, I also have I2C interrupts "screaming": 85: 294321 0 GIC tegra-i2c 116: 0 0 GIC tegra-i2c 118: 98542 0 GIC tps6586x This is a couple of seconds after boot. When USB is slow, I see the following: [ 0.385270] tps6586x 3-0034: Chip ID read failed: -121 [ 0.390584] tps6586x: probe of 3-0034 failed with error -5 ... and I2C interrupt is quiet. The I2C interrupt handler calls writel(), which does a cache sync. That would explain the "fast" behavior of Harmony. Do you see the same this on your board? M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] usb: ehci: make HC see up-to-date qh/qtd descriptor ASAP Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:50:58 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4E60A702.1060504@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B327A383@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> On 01/09/11 20:08, Stephen Warren wrote: > Marc Dietich wrote at Thursday, September 01, 2011 5:14 AM: >> I'll add Stephen Warren from NVIDIA to the CC list. He has more HW to test on. > > Here are the results I found: > > Harmony: > Tegra USB3 -> SMSC9514 hub: NOT affected > (Unplugging LAN cable, or disabling SMSC9514 LAN driver doesn't change this) > > Seaboard (springbank; clamshell): > Tegra USB1 -> no hub: Affected > > Seaboard (seaboard non-clamshell): > Tegra USB1 -> no hub: Affected > Tegra USB3 -> no hub: Affected > > TrimSlice: > Tegra USB3 -> unknown hub: Affected > > This implies there's something different about Harmony. > > Is the USB hub a clue? Seaboard doesn't have one, and although I don't > know what model TrimSlice uses, I assume it's different since I know > TrimSlice's Ethernet is not the same as Harmony's. Panda has the exact same USB hub configuration, and is affected. So we can rule this out. > I don't see anything in board-harmony.c vs. board-seaboard.c that'd affect > anything USB-related. > > Perhaps there's some kind of bootloader or BCT difference. However, my > Harmony and both Seaboards both use (a very old) U-Boot and BCT from > ChromeOS, so I don't imagine there's actually much difference there. I just noticed something else. Harmony is fast *most of the time*. In about one in 3 reboots, I get the slow behavior. When USB is fast, I also have I2C interrupts "screaming": 85: 294321 0 GIC tegra-i2c 116: 0 0 GIC tegra-i2c 118: 98542 0 GIC tps6586x This is a couple of seconds after boot. When USB is slow, I see the following: [ 0.385270] tps6586x 3-0034: Chip ID read failed: -121 [ 0.390584] tps6586x: probe of 3-0034 failed with error -5 ... and I2C interrupt is quiet. The I2C interrupt handler calls writel(), which does a cache sync. That would explain the "fast" behavior of Harmony. Do you see the same this on your board? M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-02 9:50 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-08-30 16:03 [PATCH] usb: ehci: make HC see up-to-date qh/qtd descriptor ASAP ming.lei-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw 2011-08-30 16:03 ` ming.lei at canonical.com 2011-08-30 16:15 ` Alan Stern 2011-08-30 16:15 ` Alan Stern 2011-08-30 16:38 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-30 16:38 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-30 17:15 ` Alan Stern 2011-08-30 17:15 ` Alan Stern 2011-08-30 18:45 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-30 18:45 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-30 17:26 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-30 17:26 ` Will Deacon [not found] ` <20110830172642.GE3464-SGELLbQ0bobZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org> 2011-08-30 17:48 ` Greg KH 2011-08-30 17:48 ` Greg KH 2011-08-30 17:54 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-30 17:54 ` Will Deacon [not found] ` <20110830175432.GG3464-SGELLbQ0bobZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org> 2011-08-31 0:23 ` Chen Peter-B29397 2011-08-31 0:23 ` Chen Peter-B29397 2011-08-31 8:49 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-31 8:49 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-31 12:33 ` Chen Peter-B29397 2011-08-31 12:33 ` Chen Peter-B29397 2011-08-31 13:43 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 13:43 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 15:21 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-31 15:21 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-31 15:27 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 15:27 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 16:12 ` Marc Zyngier 2011-08-31 16:12 ` Marc Zyngier 2011-08-31 16:55 ` Marc Dietrich 2011-08-31 16:55 ` Marc Dietrich 2011-09-01 10:34 ` Marc Zyngier 2011-09-01 10:34 ` Marc Zyngier [not found] ` <4E5F5FA9.3010305-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> 2011-09-01 11:13 ` Marc Dietich 2011-09-01 11:13 ` Marc Dietich 2011-09-01 19:08 ` Stephen Warren 2011-09-01 19:08 ` Stephen Warren 2011-09-02 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier [this message] 2011-09-02 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier 2011-09-02 17:07 ` Stephen Warren 2011-09-02 17:07 ` Stephen Warren [not found] ` <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B327A383-C7FfzLzN0UxDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> 2011-09-02 11:13 ` Marc Dietich 2011-09-02 11:13 ` Marc Dietich 2011-08-31 17:46 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-08-31 17:46 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-08-31 17:51 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-31 17:51 ` Will Deacon [not found] ` <20110831175147.GI8777-SGELLbQ0bobZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org> 2011-08-31 18:19 ` Rob Herring 2011-08-31 18:19 ` Rob Herring 2011-08-31 18:35 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 18:35 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 18:49 ` Rob Herring 2011-08-31 18:49 ` Rob Herring [not found] ` <4E5E8230.9060307-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2011-08-31 18:58 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 18:58 ` Mark Salter 2011-08-31 19:35 ` Will Deacon 2011-08-31 19:35 ` Will Deacon 2011-09-08 22:41 ` Mark Salter 2011-09-08 22:41 ` Mark Salter [not found] ` <1315521779.2313.29.camel-PDpCo7skNiwAicBL8TP8PQ@public.gmane.org> 2011-10-31 6:49 ` Pandita, Vikram 2011-10-31 6:49 ` Pandita, Vikram 2011-08-31 0:56 ` Ming Lei 2011-08-31 0:56 ` Ming Lei 2011-09-01 23:16 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4E60A702.1060504@arm.com \ --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=B29397@freescale.com \ --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \ --cc=greg@kroah.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=marvin24@gmx.de \ --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \ --cc=msalter@redhat.com \ --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \ --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.