From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to avoidcpu_is_omap tests early Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:41:50 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4fb3028a4ae904028e93cf6e22df7e79@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20110328222128.4046.70846.stgit@baageli.muru.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:51 AM > To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to > avoidcpu_is_omap tests early > > This allows us to remove cpu_is_omap calls from init_irq functions > and the irq handler. There should not be any need for cpu_is_omap > as at this point we only care about SoC generation, and not about > subcategories. > > The main reason for the patch is that we want to initialize only > minimal omap specific code from the init_early call, and this and > the following patches get us closer to that goal. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > --- [....] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach- > omap2/omap4-common.c > index 9ef8c29..1c3bcf1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c > @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ > #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> > #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h> > > +#include <plat/irqs.h> > + > #include <mach/hardware.h> > #include <mach/omap4-common.h> > > @@ -34,6 +36,10 @@ void __init gic_init_irq(void) > void __iomem *gic_cpu_base; > > /* Static mapping, never released */ > + omap_irq_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_GIC_CPU_BASE, SZ_4K); > + BUG_ON(!omap_irq_base); > + Above mapping is incorrect. The address space is of just 512 bytes. Infact you don't need to ioremap it again. Below should be enough. diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c index 9ef8c29..9bddc9e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ void __init gic_init_irq(void) gic_cpu_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_GIC_CPU_BASE, SZ_512); BUG_ON(!gic_cpu_base); + omap_irq_base = gic_cpu_base; + gic_init(0, 29, gic_dist_base_addr, gic_cpu_base); } Regards, Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to avoidcpu_is_omap tests early Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:41:50 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4fb3028a4ae904028e93cf6e22df7e79@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20110328222128.4046.70846.stgit@baageli.muru.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:51 AM > To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to > avoidcpu_is_omap tests early > > This allows us to remove cpu_is_omap calls from init_irq functions > and the irq handler. There should not be any need for cpu_is_omap > as at this point we only care about SoC generation, and not about > subcategories. > > The main reason for the patch is that we want to initialize only > minimal omap specific code from the init_early call, and this and > the following patches get us closer to that goal. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > --- [....] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach- > omap2/omap4-common.c > index 9ef8c29..1c3bcf1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c > @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ > #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> > #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h> > > +#include <plat/irqs.h> > + > #include <mach/hardware.h> > #include <mach/omap4-common.h> > > @@ -34,6 +36,10 @@ void __init gic_init_irq(void) > void __iomem *gic_cpu_base; > > /* Static mapping, never released */ > + omap_irq_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_GIC_CPU_BASE, SZ_4K); > + BUG_ON(!omap_irq_base); > + Above mapping is incorrect. The address space is of just 512 bytes. Infact you don't need to ioremap it again. Below should be enough. diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c index 9ef8c29..9bddc9e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ void __init gic_init_irq(void) gic_cpu_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_GIC_CPU_BASE, SZ_512); BUG_ON(!gic_cpu_base); + omap_irq_base = gic_cpu_base; + gic_init(0, 29, gic_dist_base_addr, gic_cpu_base); } Regards, Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 6:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-03-28 22:21 [PATCH 00/10] omap init_early changes for irq and timer init Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to avoid cpu_is_omap tests early Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 6:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message] 2011-03-29 6:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to avoidcpu_is_omap " Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-29 6:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-29 6:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-29 6:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-29 6:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-29 6:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-29 6:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-29 15:30 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 15:30 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 22:27 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 22:27 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] omap: Use separate init_irq functions to avoid cpu_is_omap " Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 17:11 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 17:14 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:14 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-05-17 11:28 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-05-17 11:28 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] omap: Set separate timer init functions to avoid cpu_is_omap tests Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] omap: Move dmtimer defines to dmtimer.h Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:41 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 17:41 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 17:44 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:44 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] omap: Make a subset of dmtimer functions into inline functions Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:51 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 17:51 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 17:58 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:58 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 18:01 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 18:01 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 18:02 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 18:02 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] omap2+: Use dmtimer macros for clockevent Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:16 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 17:16 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-31 21:35 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-31 21:35 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-31 22:04 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-31 22:04 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] omap2+: Remove gptimer_wakekup for now Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-31 22:09 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-31 22:09 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-04-01 16:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-04-01 16:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] omap2+: Reserve clocksource and timesource and initialize dmtimer later Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] omap2+: Use dmtimer macros for clocksource Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] omap2+: Remove omap2_gp_clockevent_set_gptimer Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] omap2+: Rename timer-gp.c into timer.c to combine timer init functions Tony Lindgren 2011-03-28 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-29 18:16 ` [PATCH 00/10] omap init_early changes for irq and timer init Kevin Hilman 2011-03-29 18:16 ` Kevin Hilman 2011-03-30 7:56 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-30 7:56 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-30 18:22 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-30 18:22 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-31 8:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-31 8:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-03-31 17:32 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-03-31 17:32 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-04-01 8:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-04-01 8:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4fb3028a4ae904028e93cf6e22df7e79@mail.gmail.com \ --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.