All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	cl@linux.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 18:52:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506C0AE8.40702@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)

We are trying to implement a physical memory hot removing function as
following thread.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201

But there is not enough review to merge into linux kernel.

I think there are following blockades.
  1. no physical memory hot removable system
  2. huge patch-set

If you have a KVM system, we can get rid of 1st blockade. Because
applying following patch, we can create memory hot removable system
on KVM guest.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg01389.html

2nd blockade is own problem. So we try to divide huge patch into
a small patch in each function as follows: 

 - bug fix
 - acpi framework
 - kernel core

We had already sent bug fix patches.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/39
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83

The patch-set implements a framework for hot removing memory.

The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject

In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug.

acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct . But
acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.

So the patch prepares the framework for hot removing memory and
adds the framework intoacpi_memory_device_remove(). And it prepares
remove_memory(). But the function does nothing because we cannot
support memory hot remove.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <rientjes@google.com>, <liuj97@gmail.com>, <len.brown@intel.com>,
	<cl@linux.com>, <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	<wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 18:52:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506C0AE8.40702@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)

We are trying to implement a physical memory hot removing function as
following thread.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201

But there is not enough review to merge into linux kernel.

I think there are following blockades.
  1. no physical memory hot removable system
  2. huge patch-set

If you have a KVM system, we can get rid of 1st blockade. Because
applying following patch, we can create memory hot removable system
on KVM guest.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg01389.html

2nd blockade is own problem. So we try to divide huge patch into
a small patch in each function as follows: 

 - bug fix
 - acpi framework
 - kernel core

We had already sent bug fix patches.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/39
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83

The patch-set implements a framework for hot removing memory.

The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject

In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug.

acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct . But
acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.

So the patch prepares the framework for hot removing memory and
adds the framework intoacpi_memory_device_remove(). And it prepares
remove_memory(). But the function does nothing because we cannot
support memory hot remove.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	cl@linux.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 18:52:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506C0AE8.40702@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)

We are trying to implement a physical memory hot removing function as
following thread.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201

But there is not enough review to merge into linux kernel.

I think there are following blockades.
  1. no physical memory hot removable system
  2. huge patch-set

If you have a KVM system, we can get rid of 1st blockade. Because
applying following patch, we can create memory hot removable system
on KVM guest.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg01389.html

2nd blockade is own problem. So we try to divide huge patch into
a small patch in each function as follows: 

 - bug fix
 - acpi framework
 - kernel core

We had already sent bug fix patches.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/39
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83

The patch-set implements a framework for hot removing memory.

The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject

In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug.

acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct . But
acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.

So the patch prepares the framework for hot removing memory and
adds the framework intoacpi_memory_device_remove(). And it prepares
remove_memory(). But the function does nothing because we cannot
support memory hot remove.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-03  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-03  9:52 Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2012-10-03  9:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-03  9:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-03  9:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to acpi_memory_device_remove() Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-03  9:58   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-04 20:53   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-04 20:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-08  6:58     ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08  6:58       ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-12 19:10       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 19:10         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  6:48         ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17  6:48           ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17  8:59           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  8:59             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  9:08             ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17  9:08               ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17  9:18               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  9:18                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  9:52                 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17  9:52                   ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-18  1:25                   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-18  1:25                     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-18  1:25                     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-19  7:35                     ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19  7:35                       ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17  9:18         ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17  9:18           ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-18 19:44           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-18 19:44             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19  9:08             ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19  9:08               ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 18:19               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19 18:19                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-20  5:02                 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-20  5:02                   ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-22 15:11                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-22 15:11                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-22 15:34                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-22 15:34                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-03 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : rename remove_memory() to offline_memory() Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-03 10:02   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-04 21:31   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-04 21:31     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-08  6:45     ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08  6:45       ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-12 18:57       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 18:57         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-03 10:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] acpi,memory-hotplug : add physical memory hotplug code to acpi_memhotplug.c Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-03 10:09   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 18:54   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 18:54     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-03 10:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : store the node id in acpi_memory_device Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-03 10:11   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-03 10:11   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 18:56   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 18:56     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-08  6:47     ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08  6:47       ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-12 18:59       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 18:59         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 0/4] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-06 14:22   ` Ni zhan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=506C0AE8.40702@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.