All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"jlayton@poochiereds.net" <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	"bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	"koct9i@gmail.com" <koct9i@gmail.com>,
	"aquini@redhat.com" <aquini@redhat.com>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	"rknize@motorola.com" <rknize@motorola.com>,
	Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
	Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>,
	Chan Gyun Jeong <chan.jeong@lge.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	YiPing Xu <xuyiping@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:46:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57027E47.7070909@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160404044458.GA20250@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>

On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Thanks for catching it, Vlastimil.
>> It was my mistake. But in this chance, I looked over hwpoison code and
>> I saw other places which increases num_poisoned_pages are successful
>> migration, already freed page and successful invalidated page.
>> IOW, they are already successful isolated page so I guess it should
>> increase the count when only successful migration is done?
> 
> Yes, that's right. When exiting with migration's failure, we shouldn't call
> test_set_page_hwpoison or num_poisoned_pages_inc, so current code checking
> (rc != -EAGAIN) is simply incorrect. Your change fixes the bug in memory
> error handling. Great!

Ah, I see, soft onlining works differently than I thought.

>> And when I read memory_failure, it bails out without killing if it
>> encounters HWPoisoned page so I think it's not for catching and
>> kill the poor proces.
>>
>>>
>>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding
>>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which
>>> pin we are releasing and which one we still have (hopefully? if I
>>> read description of da1b13ccfbebe right) otherwise it looks like
>>> doing something with a page that we just potentially freed.
>>
>> Yes, while I read the code, I had same question. I think the releasing
>> refcount is for get_any_page.
> 
> As the other callers of page migration do, soft_offline_page expects the
> migration source page to be freed at this put_page() (no pin remains.)
> The refcount released here is from isolate_lru_page() in __soft_offline_page().
> (the pin by get_any_page is released by put_hwpoison_page just after it.)
> 
> .. yes, doing something just after freeing page looks weird, but that's
> how PageHWPoison flag works. IOW, many other page flags are maintained
> only during one "allocate-free" life span, but PageHWPoison still does
> its job beyond it.

But what prevents the page from being allocated again between put_page()
and test_set_page_hwpoison()? In that case we would be marking page
poisoned while still in use, which is the same as marking it while still
in use after a failed migration?

(Also, which part prevents pages with PageHWPoison to be allocated
again, anyway? I can't find it and test_set_page_hwpoison() doesn't
remove from buddy freelists).

Thanks.

> As for commenting, this put_page() is called in any MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS
> case (regardless of callers), so what we can say here is "we free the
> source page here, bypassing LRU list" or something?
> 
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"jlayton@poochiereds.net" <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	"bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	"koct9i@gmail.com" <koct9i@gmail.com>,
	"aquini@redhat.com" <aquini@redhat.com>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	"rknize@motorola.com" <rknize@motorola.com>,
	Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
	Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>,
	Chan Gyun Jeong <chan.jeong@lge.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	YiPing Xu <xuyiping@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:46:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57027E47.7070909@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160404044458.GA20250@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>

On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Thanks for catching it, Vlastimil.
>> It was my mistake. But in this chance, I looked over hwpoison code and
>> I saw other places which increases num_poisoned_pages are successful
>> migration, already freed page and successful invalidated page.
>> IOW, they are already successful isolated page so I guess it should
>> increase the count when only successful migration is done?
> 
> Yes, that's right. When exiting with migration's failure, we shouldn't call
> test_set_page_hwpoison or num_poisoned_pages_inc, so current code checking
> (rc != -EAGAIN) is simply incorrect. Your change fixes the bug in memory
> error handling. Great!

Ah, I see, soft onlining works differently than I thought.

>> And when I read memory_failure, it bails out without killing if it
>> encounters HWPoisoned page so I think it's not for catching and
>> kill the poor proces.
>>
>>>
>>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding
>>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which
>>> pin we are releasing and which one we still have (hopefully? if I
>>> read description of da1b13ccfbebe right) otherwise it looks like
>>> doing something with a page that we just potentially freed.
>>
>> Yes, while I read the code, I had same question. I think the releasing
>> refcount is for get_any_page.
> 
> As the other callers of page migration do, soft_offline_page expects the
> migration source page to be freed at this put_page() (no pin remains.)
> The refcount released here is from isolate_lru_page() in __soft_offline_page().
> (the pin by get_any_page is released by put_hwpoison_page just after it.)
> 
> .. yes, doing something just after freeing page looks weird, but that's
> how PageHWPoison flag works. IOW, many other page flags are maintained
> only during one "allocate-free" life span, but PageHWPoison still does
> its job beyond it.

But what prevents the page from being allocated again between put_page()
and test_set_page_hwpoison()? In that case we would be marking page
poisoned while still in use, which is the same as marking it while still
in use after a failed migration?

(Also, which part prevents pages with PageHWPoison to be allocated
again, anyway? I can't find it and test_set_page_hwpoison() doesn't
remove from buddy freelists).

Thanks.

> As for commenting, this put_page() is called in any MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS
> case (regardless of callers), so what we can say here is "we free the
> source page here, bypassing LRU list" or something?
> 
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: "jlayton@poochiereds.net" <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	YiPing Xu <xuyiping@hisilicon.com>,
	"aquini@redhat.com" <aquini@redhat.com>,
	"rknize@motorola.com" <rknize@motorola.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Chan Gyun Jeong <chan.jeong@lge.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	"koct9i@gmail.com" <koct9i@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:46:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57027E47.7070909@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160404044458.GA20250@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>

On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Thanks for catching it, Vlastimil.
>> It was my mistake. But in this chance, I looked over hwpoison code and
>> I saw other places which increases num_poisoned_pages are successful
>> migration, already freed page and successful invalidated page.
>> IOW, they are already successful isolated page so I guess it should
>> increase the count when only successful migration is done?
> 
> Yes, that's right. When exiting with migration's failure, we shouldn't call
> test_set_page_hwpoison or num_poisoned_pages_inc, so current code checking
> (rc != -EAGAIN) is simply incorrect. Your change fixes the bug in memory
> error handling. Great!

Ah, I see, soft onlining works differently than I thought.

>> And when I read memory_failure, it bails out without killing if it
>> encounters HWPoisoned page so I think it's not for catching and
>> kill the poor proces.
>>
>>>
>>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding
>>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which
>>> pin we are releasing and which one we still have (hopefully? if I
>>> read description of da1b13ccfbebe right) otherwise it looks like
>>> doing something with a page that we just potentially freed.
>>
>> Yes, while I read the code, I had same question. I think the releasing
>> refcount is for get_any_page.
> 
> As the other callers of page migration do, soft_offline_page expects the
> migration source page to be freed at this put_page() (no pin remains.)
> The refcount released here is from isolate_lru_page() in __soft_offline_page().
> (the pin by get_any_page is released by put_hwpoison_page just after it.)
> 
> .. yes, doing something just after freeing page looks weird, but that's
> how PageHWPoison flag works. IOW, many other page flags are maintained
> only during one "allocate-free" life span, but PageHWPoison still does
> its job beyond it.

But what prevents the page from being allocated again between put_page()
and test_set_page_hwpoison()? In that case we would be marking page
poisoned while still in use, which is the same as marking it while still
in use after a failed migration?

(Also, which part prevents pages with PageHWPoison to be allocated
again, anyway? I can't find it and test_set_page_hwpoison() doesn't
remove from buddy freelists).

Thanks.

> As for commenting, this put_page() is called in any MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS
> case (regardless of callers), so what we can say here is "we free the
> source page here, bypassing LRU list" or something?
> 
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-04 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 185+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-30  7:11 [PATCH v3 00/16] Support non-lru page migration Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:11 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] mm: use put_page to free page instead of putback_lru_page Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-01 12:58   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-01 12:58     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-01 12:58     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04  1:39     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  1:39       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  1:39       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  4:45       ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-04  4:45         ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-04 14:46         ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-04-04 14:46           ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04 14:46           ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05  1:54           ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-05  1:54             ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-05  1:54             ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-05  8:20             ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05  8:20               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05  8:20               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-06  0:54               ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-06  0:54                 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-06  0:54                 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-06  7:57                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-06  7:57                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-06  7:57                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04  4:45       ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-04-04  5:53   ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-04  5:53   ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-04  5:53     ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-04  6:01     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  6:01       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  6:01       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-05  3:10       ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-05  3:10       ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-05  3:10         ` Balbir Singh
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-01 21:29   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-01 21:29     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04  5:12     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  5:12       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04 13:24       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04 13:24         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04 13:24         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-07  2:35         ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-07  2:35           ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-07  2:35         ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04 13:24       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04  5:12     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-01 21:29   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-12  8:00   ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-12  8:00     ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-12 14:25     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-12 14:25       ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] mm: add non-lru movable page support document Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-01 14:38   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-01 14:38   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-01 14:38     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04  2:25     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  2:25       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  2:25       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04 13:09       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04 13:09         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-04 13:09         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-07  2:27         ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-07  2:27         ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-07  2:27           ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] mm/balloon: use general movable page feature into balloon Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-05 12:03   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05 12:03     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05 12:03     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-11  4:29     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-11  4:29     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-11  4:29       ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] zsmalloc: keep max_object in size_class Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-17 15:08   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:08   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:08     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] zsmalloc: squeeze inuse into page->mapping Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-17 15:08   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:08   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:08     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-19  7:40     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:40       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:40     ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] zsmalloc: remove page_mapcount_reset Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-17 15:11   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:11   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:11     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] zsmalloc: squeeze freelist into page->mapping Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-17 15:56   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:56   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:56     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-19  7:42     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:42       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:42       ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] zsmalloc: move struct zs_meta from mapping to freelist Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-17 15:22   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:22   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-17 15:22     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] zsmalloc: factor page chain functionality out Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-18  0:33   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-18  0:33     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-19  7:46     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:46       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:46     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-18  0:33   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] zsmalloc: separate free_zspage from putback_zspage Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-18  1:04   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-18  1:04     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-19  7:51     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:51       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  7:53       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-19  7:53         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-19  7:53         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-19  7:51     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-18  1:04   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] zsmalloc: zs_compact refactoring Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  8:04   ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-04  8:04     ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-04  9:01     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04  9:01       ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] zsmalloc: migrate head page of zspage Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-06 13:01   ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-06 13:01     ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-07  0:34     ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-07  0:34       ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-07  0:43     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-07  0:43       ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  6:08   ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-19  6:08     ` Chulmin Kim
2016-04-19  6:15     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-19  6:15       ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] zsmalloc: use single linked list for page chain Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] zsmalloc: migrate tail pages in zspage Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] zram: use __GFP_MOVABLE for memory allocation Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30  7:12   ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-30 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] Support non-lru page migration Andrew Morton
2016-03-30 23:11   ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-30 23:11   ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-31  0:29   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-31  0:29   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-31  0:29     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-31  0:57     ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-31  0:57     ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-31  0:57       ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-31  0:57   ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-31  0:57   ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-31  0:57     ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-04 13:17 ` John Einar Reitan
2016-04-04 13:17 ` John Einar Reitan
2016-04-11  4:35   ` Minchan Kim
2016-04-11  4:35     ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57027E47.7070909@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chan.jeong@lge.com \
    --cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rknize@motorola.com \
    --cc=sangseok.lee@lge.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xuyiping@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.