From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com> Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/18] vfio: Register/unregister irq_bypass_producer Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:35:12 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <57222DB0.7080205@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20160426140816.67b8b37c@t450s.home> Hi Alex, On 04/26/2016 10:08 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:29:50 +0800 > Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote: > > @@ -360,6 +361,14 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct > vfio_pci_device *vdev, >> return ret; >> } >> >> + vdev->ctx[vector].producer.token = trigger; >> + vdev->ctx[vector].producer.irq = irq; >> + ret = irq_bypass_register_producer(&vdev->ctx[vector].producer); >> + if (unlikely(ret)) >> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, >> + "irq bypass producer (token %p) registeration fails: %d\n", >> + vdev->ctx[vector].producer.token, ret); >> + >> vdev->ctx[vector].trigger = trigger; >> >> return 0; > > Digging back into the IRQ producer/consumer thing, I'm not sure how we > should be handling a failure here, but it turns out that what we have > is pretty sub-optimal. Any sort of testing on AMD hits this dev_info > because kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer() returns -EINVAL without > kvm_x86_ops->update_pi_irte which is only implemented for vmx. Clearly > we don't want to spew confusing error messages for a feature that does > not exist. > > The easiest option is to simply make this error silent, but should > registering a producer/consumer really fail due to a mismatch on the > other end or should the __connect sequence fail silently, which both > ends would know about (if they care) due to the add/del handshake > between them? Perhaps for now we simply need a stable suitable fix to > silence the dev_info above, but longer term, registration shouldn't > fail for mismatches like this. Thoughts? Thanks, Regarding the ARM IRQ forwarding use case, I think it is OK to fail silently. We would fall back to the irqfd standard mechanism. Anyway this series still is waiting for ARM new-vgic dependency to be resolved, as discussed with Christoffer and Marc. Best Regards Eric > > Alex >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Feng Wu <feng.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Cc: kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, mtosatti-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/18] vfio: Register/unregister irq_bypass_producer Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:35:12 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <57222DB0.7080205@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20160426140816.67b8b37c-1yVPhWWZRC1BDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org> Hi Alex, On 04/26/2016 10:08 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:29:50 +0800 > Feng Wu <feng.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > @@ -360,6 +361,14 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct > vfio_pci_device *vdev, >> return ret; >> } >> >> + vdev->ctx[vector].producer.token = trigger; >> + vdev->ctx[vector].producer.irq = irq; >> + ret = irq_bypass_register_producer(&vdev->ctx[vector].producer); >> + if (unlikely(ret)) >> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, >> + "irq bypass producer (token %p) registeration fails: %d\n", >> + vdev->ctx[vector].producer.token, ret); >> + >> vdev->ctx[vector].trigger = trigger; >> >> return 0; > > Digging back into the IRQ producer/consumer thing, I'm not sure how we > should be handling a failure here, but it turns out that what we have > is pretty sub-optimal. Any sort of testing on AMD hits this dev_info > because kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer() returns -EINVAL without > kvm_x86_ops->update_pi_irte which is only implemented for vmx. Clearly > we don't want to spew confusing error messages for a feature that does > not exist. > > The easiest option is to simply make this error silent, but should > registering a producer/consumer really fail due to a mismatch on the > other end or should the __connect sequence fail silently, which both > ends would know about (if they care) due to the add/del handshake > between them? Perhaps for now we simply need a stable suitable fix to > silence the dev_info above, but longer term, registration shouldn't > fail for mismatches like this. Thoughts? Thanks, Regarding the ARM IRQ forwarding use case, I think it is OK to fail silently. We would fall back to the irqfd standard mechanism. Anyway this series still is waiting for ARM new-vgic dependency to be resolved, as discussed with Christoffer and Marc. Best Regards Eric > > Alex >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 15:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-09-18 14:29 [PATCH v9 00/18] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support - including prerequisite series Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] virt: IRQ bypass manager Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 15:34 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 15:34 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] KVM: x86: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] KVM: arm/arm64: " Feng Wu 2015-09-21 19:32 ` Eric Auger 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] KVM: create kvm_irqfd.h Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 15:35 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 15:35 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] KVM: introduce kvm_arch functions for IRQ bypass Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] KVM: Extend struct pi_desc for VT-d Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] KVM: Add some helper functions for Posted-Interrupts Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] KVM: Define a new interface kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu() Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] KVM: Make struct kvm_irq_routing_table accessible Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] KVM: make kvm_set_msi_irq() public Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] vfio: Register/unregister irq_bypass_producer Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 17:19 ` Alex Williamson 2015-09-18 17:19 ` Alex Williamson 2015-09-21 8:56 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 8:56 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 9:32 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-21 9:32 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-21 11:35 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 11:35 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 12:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-21 12:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-21 12:08 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 12:08 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 12:53 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 12:53 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-21 19:46 ` Eric Auger 2015-09-21 19:46 ` Eric Auger 2016-04-26 20:08 ` Alex Williamson 2016-04-26 20:08 ` Alex Williamson 2016-04-27 1:32 ` Wu, Feng 2016-04-27 1:32 ` Wu, Feng 2016-04-28 16:40 ` Alex Williamson 2016-04-28 16:40 ` Alex Williamson 2016-04-28 15:35 ` Eric Auger [this message] 2016-04-28 15:35 ` Eric Auger 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] KVM: x86: Update IRTE for posted-interrupts Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] KVM: Implement IRQ bypass consumer callbacks for x86 Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] KVM: Add an arch specific hooks in 'struct kvm_kernel_irqfd' Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] KVM: Update Posted-Interrupts Descriptor when vCPU is preempted Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] KVM: Update Posted-Interrupts Descriptor when vCPU is blocked Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-18 16:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-18 16:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-19 7:11 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-19 7:11 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 2:16 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 5:32 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-21 5:32 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-21 5:45 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-21 5:45 ` Wu, Feng 2015-10-14 23:41 ` David Matlack 2015-10-15 1:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-10-15 1:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-10-15 17:39 ` David Matlack 2015-10-15 18:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-10-15 18:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-10-16 1:45 ` Wu, Feng 2015-10-16 1:45 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 14:29 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] iommu/vt-d: Add a command line parameter for VT-d posted-interrupts Feng Wu 2015-09-18 14:29 ` Feng Wu 2015-09-21 13:46 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-09-21 13:46 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-09-18 14:58 ` [PATCH v9 00/18] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support - including prerequisite series Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-18 14:58 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-18 15:08 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 15:08 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-18 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-18 15:38 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-18 17:57 ` Alex Williamson 2015-09-18 17:57 ` Alex Williamson 2015-09-25 1:49 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-25 1:49 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-25 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-25 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-28 10:14 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-28 10:14 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-28 10:18 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-28 10:18 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-09-28 10:22 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-28 10:22 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-22 9:01 [PATCH v9 12/18] vfio: Register/unregister irq_bypass_producer Wu, Feng 2015-09-22 9:01 ` Wu, Feng 2015-09-23 1:35 ` Eric Auger 2015-09-23 1:35 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=57222DB0.7080205@linaro.org \ --to=eric.auger@linaro.org \ --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \ --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.