From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant call to kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset() Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:15:12 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <594ae6f5-ad00-6279-e963-8b047c0209d6@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <eba17923-3e33-3e3d-0cf0-8f66d389146b@arm.com> Hi Alexandru, On 12/14/20 3:02 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Thanks for having a look! > > On 12/14/20 1:48 PM, Auger Eric wrote: >> Alexandru, >> >> On 12/1/20 4:01 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote: >>> KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT ioctl calls kvm_reset_vcpu(), which in turn resets the >>> PMU with a call to kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(). The function zeroes the PMU >>> chained counters bitmap and stops all the counters with a perf event >>> attached. Because it is called before the VCPU has had the chance to run, >>> no perf events are in use and none are released. >>> >>> kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(), called by kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() only if the >>> VCPU has not been initialized, also resets the PMU. kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset() in >> This sounds strange to me. kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() only is called if >> kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu) is true. > > Typo on my part, the "not" should not be there. kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() is > called only if kvm_vcpu_initialized() returns true in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(). > >>> this case does the exact same thing as the previous call, so remove it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 2 -- >>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c >>> index 398f6df1bbe4..4ad66a532e38 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c >>> @@ -850,8 +850,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> >>> - kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu); >>> - >> this patch does not apply for me (vcpu->arch.pmu.ready = true; ?) > > I should have mentioned it in the cover letter, this is on top of Marc's pmu-undef > branch: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=kvm-arm64/pmu-undef > > it should work on top of commit 7521c3a9e630 ("KVM: arm64: Get ready of the PMU > ready state"), the branch was rebased since I sent the patches. OK noted. Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Alex >> >> Thanks >> >> Eric >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant call to kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset() Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:15:12 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <594ae6f5-ad00-6279-e963-8b047c0209d6@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <eba17923-3e33-3e3d-0cf0-8f66d389146b@arm.com> Hi Alexandru, On 12/14/20 3:02 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Thanks for having a look! > > On 12/14/20 1:48 PM, Auger Eric wrote: >> Alexandru, >> >> On 12/1/20 4:01 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote: >>> KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT ioctl calls kvm_reset_vcpu(), which in turn resets the >>> PMU with a call to kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(). The function zeroes the PMU >>> chained counters bitmap and stops all the counters with a perf event >>> attached. Because it is called before the VCPU has had the chance to run, >>> no perf events are in use and none are released. >>> >>> kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(), called by kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() only if the >>> VCPU has not been initialized, also resets the PMU. kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset() in >> This sounds strange to me. kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() only is called if >> kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu) is true. > > Typo on my part, the "not" should not be there. kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() is > called only if kvm_vcpu_initialized() returns true in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(). > >>> this case does the exact same thing as the previous call, so remove it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 2 -- >>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c >>> index 398f6df1bbe4..4ad66a532e38 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c >>> @@ -850,8 +850,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> >>> - kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu); >>> - >> this patch does not apply for me (vcpu->arch.pmu.ready = true; ?) > > I should have mentioned it in the cover letter, this is on top of Marc's pmu-undef > branch: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=kvm-arm64/pmu-undef > > it should work on top of commit 7521c3a9e630 ("KVM: arm64: Get ready of the PMU > ready state"), the branch was rebased since I sent the patches. OK noted. Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Alex >> >> Thanks >> >> Eric >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-15 9:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-01 15:01 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Miscellaneous improvements Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Documentation: Add arm64 KVM_RUN error codes Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: arch_timer: Remove VGIC initialization check Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-14 12:45 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-14 12:45 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Move double-checked lock to kvm_vgic_map_resources() Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-14 12:55 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-14 12:55 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-27 14:36 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-12-27 14:36 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Update comment in kvm_vgic_map_resources() Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-14 12:59 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-14 12:59 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant call to kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset() Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:01 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-14 13:48 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-14 13:48 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-14 14:02 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-14 14:02 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-15 9:15 ` Auger Eric [this message] 2020-12-15 9:15 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-27 14:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Miscellaneous improvements Marc Zyngier 2020-12-27 14:41 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=594ae6f5-ad00-6279-e963-8b047c0209d6@redhat.com \ --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \ --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \ --cc=james.morse@arm.com \ --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.