All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <rafael@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>,
	<roger.lu@mediatek.com>, <hsinyi@google.com>,
	<khilman@baylibre.com>, <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 18:29:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <696e3b1659d60e128b006cc0b41bbb21528a3949.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505085200.rzwzblirsprkvcz7@vireshk-i7>

On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 14:22 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-05-22, 21:05, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> > From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Voltages and shifts are defined as macros originally.
> > There are different requirements of these values for each MediaTek
> > SoCs.
> > Therefore, we add the platform data and move these values into it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > ------
> >  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > index 363ebecb2c80..80a3d4cd49ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -10,15 +10,21 @@
> >  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  
> > -#define MIN_VOLT_SHIFT		(100000)
> > -#define MAX_VOLT_SHIFT		(200000)
> > -#define MAX_VOLT_LIMIT		(1150000)
> >  #define VOLT_TOL		(10000)
> >  
> > +struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data {
> > +	int min_volt_shift;
> > +	int max_volt_shift;
> > +	int proc_max_volt;
> > +	int sram_min_volt;
> > +	int sram_max_volt;
> > +};
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info holds necessary information for
> > doing CPU DVFS
> >   * on each CPU power/clock domain of Mediatek SoCs. Each CPU
> > cluster in
> > @@ -46,8 +52,11 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
> >  	struct notifier_block opp_nb;
> >  	unsigned int opp_cpu;
> >  	unsigned long opp_freq;
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data;
> >  };
> >  
> > +static struct platform_device *cpufreq_pdev;
> > +
> >  static LIST_HEAD(dvfs_info_list);
> >  
> >  static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(int cpu)
> > @@ -65,6 +74,7 @@ static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info
> > *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(int cpu)
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info
> > *info,
> >  					int new_vproc)
> >  {
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data = info-
> > >soc_data;
> >  	struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
> >  	struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
> >  	int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
> > @@ -76,7 +86,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  		return pre_vproc;
> >  	}
> >  	/* Vsram should not exceed the maximum allowed voltage of SoC.
> > */
> > -	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + MIN_VOLT_SHIFT, MAX_VOLT_LIMIT);
> > +	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
> > +			soc_data->sram_max_volt);
> >  
> >  	if (pre_vproc < new_vproc) {
> >  		/*
> > @@ -99,10 +110,11 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				return pre_vproc;
> >  			}
> >  
> > -			vsram = min(new_vsram, pre_vproc +
> > MAX_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +			vsram = min(new_vsram,
> > +				    pre_vproc + soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift);
> >  
> > -			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= MAX_VOLT_LIMIT) {
> > -				vsram = MAX_VOLT_LIMIT;
> > +			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data-
> > >sram_max_volt) {
> > +				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
> >  
> >  				/*
> >  				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum
> > voltage,
> > @@ -120,7 +132,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
> > vsram,
> >  							    vsram +
> > VOLT_TOL);
> >  
> > -				vproc = vsram - MIN_VOLT_SHIFT;
> > +				vproc = vsram - soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift;
> >  			}
> >  			if (ret)
> >  				return ret;
> > @@ -154,7 +166,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				return pre_vsram;
> >  			}
> >  
> > -			vproc = max(new_vproc, pre_vsram -
> > MAX_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +			vproc = max(new_vproc,
> > +				    pre_vsram - soc_data-
> > >max_volt_shift);
> >  			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
> >  						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
> >  			if (ret)
> > @@ -163,10 +176,11 @@ static int
> > mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  			if (vproc == new_vproc)
> >  				vsram = new_vsram;
> >  			else
> > -				vsram = max(new_vsram, vproc +
> > MIN_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +				vsram = max(new_vsram,
> > +					    vproc + soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift);
> >  
> > -			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= MAX_VOLT_LIMIT) {
> > -				vsram = MAX_VOLT_LIMIT;
> > +			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data-
> > >sram_max_volt) {
> > +				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
> >  
> >  				/*
> >  				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum
> > voltage,
> > @@ -197,13 +211,14 @@ static int
> > mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> > int vproc)
> >  {
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data = info-
> > >soc_data;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	if (info->need_voltage_tracking)
> >  		ret = mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(info, vproc);
> >  	else
> >  		ret = regulator_set_voltage(info->proc_reg, vproc,
> > -					    MAX_VOLT_LIMIT);
> > +					    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
> >  	if (!ret)
> >  		info->pre_vproc = vproc;
> >  
> > @@ -583,9 +598,17 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver
> > mtk_cpufreq_driver = {
> >  
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > +	const struct of_device_id *match;
> >  	struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, *tmp;
> >  	int cpu, ret;
> >  
> > +	match = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +	if (!match || !match->data) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > +			"failed to get mtk cpufreq platform data\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >  		info = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(cpu);
> >  		if (info)
> > @@ -597,6 +620,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >  			goto release_dvfs_info_list;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		info->soc_data = match->data;
> >  		ret = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(info, cpu);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > @@ -632,20 +656,27 @@ static struct platform_driver
> > mtk_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> >  	.probe		= mtk_cpufreq_probe,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data mt2701_platform_data
> > = {
> > +	.min_volt_shift = 100000,
> > +	.max_volt_shift = 200000,
> > +	.proc_max_volt = 1150000,
> > +	.sram_min_volt = 0,
> > +	.sram_max_volt = 1150000,
> > +};
> > +
> >  /* List of machines supported by this driver */
> >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_machines[]
> > __initconst = {
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt817x", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8176", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8516", },
> > -
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt817x", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8176", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8516", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> >  	{ }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_cpufreq_machines);
> > @@ -654,7 +685,6 @@ static int __init mtk_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *np;
> >  	const struct of_device_id *match;
> > -	struct platform_device *pdev;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> > @@ -678,11 +708,12 @@ static int __init
> > mtk_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> >  	 * and the device registration codes are put here to handle
> > defer
> >  	 * probing.
> >  	 */
> > -	pdev = platform_device_register_simple("mtk-cpufreq", -1, NULL,
> > 0);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> > +	cpufreq_pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "mtk-
> > cpufreq", -1,
> > +						     match,
> > sizeof(*match));
> 
> Why pass match here instead of just the data ?
> 

Hello Viresh,

Thanks for your review.
I will pass data directly in next version.

> > +	if (IS_ERR(cpufreq_pdev)) {
> >  		pr_err("failed to register mtk-cpufreq platform
> > device\n");
> >  		platform_driver_unregister(&mtk_cpufreq_platdrv);
> > -		return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> > +		return PTR_ERR(cpufreq_pdev);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -691,6 +722,7 @@ module_init(mtk_cpufreq_driver_init)
> >  
> >  static void __exit mtk_cpufreq_driver_exit(void)
> >  {
> > +	platform_device_unregister(cpufreq_pdev);
> 
> You fixed a bug silently :)
> 
> That's not right.
> 

I will move this modification to another patch.

BRs,
Rex

> >  	platform_driver_unregister(&mtk_cpufreq_platdrv);
> >  }
> >  module_exit(mtk_cpufreq_driver_exit)
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0
> 
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <rafael@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>,
	<roger.lu@mediatek.com>, <hsinyi@google.com>,
	<khilman@baylibre.com>, <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 18:29:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <696e3b1659d60e128b006cc0b41bbb21528a3949.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505085200.rzwzblirsprkvcz7@vireshk-i7>

On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 14:22 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-05-22, 21:05, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> > From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Voltages and shifts are defined as macros originally.
> > There are different requirements of these values for each MediaTek
> > SoCs.
> > Therefore, we add the platform data and move these values into it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > ------
> >  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > index 363ebecb2c80..80a3d4cd49ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -10,15 +10,21 @@
> >  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  
> > -#define MIN_VOLT_SHIFT		(100000)
> > -#define MAX_VOLT_SHIFT		(200000)
> > -#define MAX_VOLT_LIMIT		(1150000)
> >  #define VOLT_TOL		(10000)
> >  
> > +struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data {
> > +	int min_volt_shift;
> > +	int max_volt_shift;
> > +	int proc_max_volt;
> > +	int sram_min_volt;
> > +	int sram_max_volt;
> > +};
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info holds necessary information for
> > doing CPU DVFS
> >   * on each CPU power/clock domain of Mediatek SoCs. Each CPU
> > cluster in
> > @@ -46,8 +52,11 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
> >  	struct notifier_block opp_nb;
> >  	unsigned int opp_cpu;
> >  	unsigned long opp_freq;
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data;
> >  };
> >  
> > +static struct platform_device *cpufreq_pdev;
> > +
> >  static LIST_HEAD(dvfs_info_list);
> >  
> >  static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(int cpu)
> > @@ -65,6 +74,7 @@ static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info
> > *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(int cpu)
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info
> > *info,
> >  					int new_vproc)
> >  {
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data = info-
> > >soc_data;
> >  	struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
> >  	struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
> >  	int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
> > @@ -76,7 +86,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  		return pre_vproc;
> >  	}
> >  	/* Vsram should not exceed the maximum allowed voltage of SoC.
> > */
> > -	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + MIN_VOLT_SHIFT, MAX_VOLT_LIMIT);
> > +	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
> > +			soc_data->sram_max_volt);
> >  
> >  	if (pre_vproc < new_vproc) {
> >  		/*
> > @@ -99,10 +110,11 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				return pre_vproc;
> >  			}
> >  
> > -			vsram = min(new_vsram, pre_vproc +
> > MAX_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +			vsram = min(new_vsram,
> > +				    pre_vproc + soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift);
> >  
> > -			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= MAX_VOLT_LIMIT) {
> > -				vsram = MAX_VOLT_LIMIT;
> > +			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data-
> > >sram_max_volt) {
> > +				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
> >  
> >  				/*
> >  				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum
> > voltage,
> > @@ -120,7 +132,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
> > vsram,
> >  							    vsram +
> > VOLT_TOL);
> >  
> > -				vproc = vsram - MIN_VOLT_SHIFT;
> > +				vproc = vsram - soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift;
> >  			}
> >  			if (ret)
> >  				return ret;
> > @@ -154,7 +166,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				return pre_vsram;
> >  			}
> >  
> > -			vproc = max(new_vproc, pre_vsram -
> > MAX_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +			vproc = max(new_vproc,
> > +				    pre_vsram - soc_data-
> > >max_volt_shift);
> >  			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
> >  						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
> >  			if (ret)
> > @@ -163,10 +176,11 @@ static int
> > mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  			if (vproc == new_vproc)
> >  				vsram = new_vsram;
> >  			else
> > -				vsram = max(new_vsram, vproc +
> > MIN_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +				vsram = max(new_vsram,
> > +					    vproc + soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift);
> >  
> > -			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= MAX_VOLT_LIMIT) {
> > -				vsram = MAX_VOLT_LIMIT;
> > +			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data-
> > >sram_max_volt) {
> > +				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
> >  
> >  				/*
> >  				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum
> > voltage,
> > @@ -197,13 +211,14 @@ static int
> > mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> > int vproc)
> >  {
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data = info-
> > >soc_data;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	if (info->need_voltage_tracking)
> >  		ret = mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(info, vproc);
> >  	else
> >  		ret = regulator_set_voltage(info->proc_reg, vproc,
> > -					    MAX_VOLT_LIMIT);
> > +					    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
> >  	if (!ret)
> >  		info->pre_vproc = vproc;
> >  
> > @@ -583,9 +598,17 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver
> > mtk_cpufreq_driver = {
> >  
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > +	const struct of_device_id *match;
> >  	struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, *tmp;
> >  	int cpu, ret;
> >  
> > +	match = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +	if (!match || !match->data) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > +			"failed to get mtk cpufreq platform data\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >  		info = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(cpu);
> >  		if (info)
> > @@ -597,6 +620,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >  			goto release_dvfs_info_list;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		info->soc_data = match->data;
> >  		ret = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(info, cpu);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > @@ -632,20 +656,27 @@ static struct platform_driver
> > mtk_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> >  	.probe		= mtk_cpufreq_probe,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data mt2701_platform_data
> > = {
> > +	.min_volt_shift = 100000,
> > +	.max_volt_shift = 200000,
> > +	.proc_max_volt = 1150000,
> > +	.sram_min_volt = 0,
> > +	.sram_max_volt = 1150000,
> > +};
> > +
> >  /* List of machines supported by this driver */
> >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_machines[]
> > __initconst = {
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt817x", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8176", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8516", },
> > -
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt817x", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8176", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8516", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> >  	{ }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_cpufreq_machines);
> > @@ -654,7 +685,6 @@ static int __init mtk_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *np;
> >  	const struct of_device_id *match;
> > -	struct platform_device *pdev;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> > @@ -678,11 +708,12 @@ static int __init
> > mtk_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> >  	 * and the device registration codes are put here to handle
> > defer
> >  	 * probing.
> >  	 */
> > -	pdev = platform_device_register_simple("mtk-cpufreq", -1, NULL,
> > 0);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> > +	cpufreq_pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "mtk-
> > cpufreq", -1,
> > +						     match,
> > sizeof(*match));
> 
> Why pass match here instead of just the data ?
> 

Hello Viresh,

Thanks for your review.
I will pass data directly in next version.

> > +	if (IS_ERR(cpufreq_pdev)) {
> >  		pr_err("failed to register mtk-cpufreq platform
> > device\n");
> >  		platform_driver_unregister(&mtk_cpufreq_platdrv);
> > -		return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> > +		return PTR_ERR(cpufreq_pdev);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -691,6 +722,7 @@ module_init(mtk_cpufreq_driver_init)
> >  
> >  static void __exit mtk_cpufreq_driver_exit(void)
> >  {
> > +	platform_device_unregister(cpufreq_pdev);
> 
> You fixed a bug silently :)
> 
> That's not right.
> 

I will move this modification to another patch.

BRs,
Rex

> >  	platform_driver_unregister(&mtk_cpufreq_platdrv);
> >  }
> >  module_exit(mtk_cpufreq_driver_exit)
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <rafael@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>,
	<roger.lu@mediatek.com>, <hsinyi@google.com>,
	<khilman@baylibre.com>, <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 18:29:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <696e3b1659d60e128b006cc0b41bbb21528a3949.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505085200.rzwzblirsprkvcz7@vireshk-i7>

On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 14:22 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-05-22, 21:05, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> > From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Voltages and shifts are defined as macros originally.
> > There are different requirements of these values for each MediaTek
> > SoCs.
> > Therefore, we add the platform data and move these values into it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > ------
> >  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > index 363ebecb2c80..80a3d4cd49ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -10,15 +10,21 @@
> >  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  
> > -#define MIN_VOLT_SHIFT		(100000)
> > -#define MAX_VOLT_SHIFT		(200000)
> > -#define MAX_VOLT_LIMIT		(1150000)
> >  #define VOLT_TOL		(10000)
> >  
> > +struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data {
> > +	int min_volt_shift;
> > +	int max_volt_shift;
> > +	int proc_max_volt;
> > +	int sram_min_volt;
> > +	int sram_max_volt;
> > +};
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info holds necessary information for
> > doing CPU DVFS
> >   * on each CPU power/clock domain of Mediatek SoCs. Each CPU
> > cluster in
> > @@ -46,8 +52,11 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
> >  	struct notifier_block opp_nb;
> >  	unsigned int opp_cpu;
> >  	unsigned long opp_freq;
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data;
> >  };
> >  
> > +static struct platform_device *cpufreq_pdev;
> > +
> >  static LIST_HEAD(dvfs_info_list);
> >  
> >  static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(int cpu)
> > @@ -65,6 +74,7 @@ static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info
> > *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(int cpu)
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info
> > *info,
> >  					int new_vproc)
> >  {
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data = info-
> > >soc_data;
> >  	struct regulator *proc_reg = info->proc_reg;
> >  	struct regulator *sram_reg = info->sram_reg;
> >  	int pre_vproc, pre_vsram, new_vsram, vsram, vproc, ret;
> > @@ -76,7 +86,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  		return pre_vproc;
> >  	}
> >  	/* Vsram should not exceed the maximum allowed voltage of SoC.
> > */
> > -	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + MIN_VOLT_SHIFT, MAX_VOLT_LIMIT);
> > +	new_vsram = min(new_vproc + soc_data->min_volt_shift,
> > +			soc_data->sram_max_volt);
> >  
> >  	if (pre_vproc < new_vproc) {
> >  		/*
> > @@ -99,10 +110,11 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				return pre_vproc;
> >  			}
> >  
> > -			vsram = min(new_vsram, pre_vproc +
> > MAX_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +			vsram = min(new_vsram,
> > +				    pre_vproc + soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift);
> >  
> > -			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= MAX_VOLT_LIMIT) {
> > -				vsram = MAX_VOLT_LIMIT;
> > +			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data-
> > >sram_max_volt) {
> > +				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
> >  
> >  				/*
> >  				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum
> > voltage,
> > @@ -120,7 +132,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				ret = regulator_set_voltage(sram_reg,
> > vsram,
> >  							    vsram +
> > VOLT_TOL);
> >  
> > -				vproc = vsram - MIN_VOLT_SHIFT;
> > +				vproc = vsram - soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift;
> >  			}
> >  			if (ret)
> >  				return ret;
> > @@ -154,7 +166,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  				return pre_vsram;
> >  			}
> >  
> > -			vproc = max(new_vproc, pre_vsram -
> > MAX_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +			vproc = max(new_vproc,
> > +				    pre_vsram - soc_data-
> > >max_volt_shift);
> >  			ret = regulator_set_voltage(proc_reg, vproc,
> >  						    vproc + VOLT_TOL);
> >  			if (ret)
> > @@ -163,10 +176,11 @@ static int
> > mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  			if (vproc == new_vproc)
> >  				vsram = new_vsram;
> >  			else
> > -				vsram = max(new_vsram, vproc +
> > MIN_VOLT_SHIFT);
> > +				vsram = max(new_vsram,
> > +					    vproc + soc_data-
> > >min_volt_shift);
> >  
> > -			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= MAX_VOLT_LIMIT) {
> > -				vsram = MAX_VOLT_LIMIT;
> > +			if (vsram + VOLT_TOL >= soc_data-
> > >sram_max_volt) {
> > +				vsram = soc_data->sram_max_volt;
> >  
> >  				/*
> >  				 * If the target Vsram hits the maximum
> > voltage,
> > @@ -197,13 +211,14 @@ static int
> > mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> >  
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info,
> > int vproc)
> >  {
> > +	const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data *soc_data = info-
> > >soc_data;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	if (info->need_voltage_tracking)
> >  		ret = mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking(info, vproc);
> >  	else
> >  		ret = regulator_set_voltage(info->proc_reg, vproc,
> > -					    MAX_VOLT_LIMIT);
> > +					    soc_data->proc_max_volt);
> >  	if (!ret)
> >  		info->pre_vproc = vproc;
> >  
> > @@ -583,9 +598,17 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver
> > mtk_cpufreq_driver = {
> >  
> >  static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > +	const struct of_device_id *match;
> >  	struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, *tmp;
> >  	int cpu, ret;
> >  
> > +	match = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +	if (!match || !match->data) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > +			"failed to get mtk cpufreq platform data\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >  		info = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_lookup(cpu);
> >  		if (info)
> > @@ -597,6 +620,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >  			goto release_dvfs_info_list;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		info->soc_data = match->data;
> >  		ret = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(info, cpu);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > @@ -632,20 +656,27 @@ static struct platform_driver
> > mtk_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> >  	.probe		= mtk_cpufreq_probe,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data mt2701_platform_data
> > = {
> > +	.min_volt_shift = 100000,
> > +	.max_volt_shift = 200000,
> > +	.proc_max_volt = 1150000,
> > +	.sram_min_volt = 0,
> > +	.sram_max_volt = 1150000,
> > +};
> > +
> >  /* List of machines supported by this driver */
> >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_machines[]
> > __initconst = {
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt817x", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8176", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365", },
> > -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8516", },
> > -
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt817x", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8176", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8516", .data =
> > &mt2701_platform_data },
> >  	{ }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_cpufreq_machines);
> > @@ -654,7 +685,6 @@ static int __init mtk_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *np;
> >  	const struct of_device_id *match;
> > -	struct platform_device *pdev;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> > @@ -678,11 +708,12 @@ static int __init
> > mtk_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> >  	 * and the device registration codes are put here to handle
> > defer
> >  	 * probing.
> >  	 */
> > -	pdev = platform_device_register_simple("mtk-cpufreq", -1, NULL,
> > 0);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> > +	cpufreq_pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "mtk-
> > cpufreq", -1,
> > +						     match,
> > sizeof(*match));
> 
> Why pass match here instead of just the data ?
> 

Hello Viresh,

Thanks for your review.
I will pass data directly in next version.

> > +	if (IS_ERR(cpufreq_pdev)) {
> >  		pr_err("failed to register mtk-cpufreq platform
> > device\n");
> >  		platform_driver_unregister(&mtk_cpufreq_platdrv);
> > -		return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> > +		return PTR_ERR(cpufreq_pdev);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -691,6 +722,7 @@ module_init(mtk_cpufreq_driver_init)
> >  
> >  static void __exit mtk_cpufreq_driver_exit(void)
> >  {
> > +	platform_device_unregister(cpufreq_pdev);
> 
> You fixed a bug silently :)
> 
> That's not right.
> 

I will move this modification to another patch.

BRs,
Rex

> >  	platform_driver_unregister(&mtk_cpufreq_platdrv);
> >  }
> >  module_exit(mtk_cpufreq_driver_exit)
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-04 13:05 [PATCH v5 0/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Cleanup and support MT8183 and MT8186 Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: cpufreq: mediatek: Add MediaTek CCI property Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05  8:41   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-05  8:41     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-05  8:41     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification support Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05  8:43   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  8:43     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  8:43     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  9:44     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05  9:44       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05  8:52   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  8:52     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  8:52     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05 10:29     ` Rex-BC Chen [this message]
2022-05-05 10:29       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05 10:29       ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking() Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Link CCI device to CPU Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add opp table and clock property for MT8183 cpufreq Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add MediaTek CCI node for MT8183 Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mediatek,cci property for MT8183 cpufreq Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` [PATCH v5 9/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mediatek, cci " Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-04 13:05   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05  8:53 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] cpufreq: mediatek: Cleanup and support MT8183 and MT8186 Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  8:53   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  8:53   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-05  9:47   ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05  9:47     ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-05-05  9:47     ` Rex-BC Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=696e3b1659d60e128b006cc0b41bbb21528a3949.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hsinyi@google.com \
    --cc=jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.lu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.