From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 16:09:43 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <86frwiz1rs.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <248ec30e7b5c8a42d184f029c1cc9b664656b356.camel@infradead.org> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:17:58 +0000, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>] > On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 12:41 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 05:14:42PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 08:27 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote: > > > > If we're going down the route of having this PSCI call live in KVM, it > > > > really deserves a test. I think you can just pile on the existing > > > > psci_test selftest. > > > > > > Added to > > > https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/psci-hibernate > > > for next time. > > > > > > From 8c72a78e6179bc8970edc66a85ab6bee26f581fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> > > > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:07:46 +0000 > > > Subject: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> > > > > Looks good, thanks! > > Thanks. > > Marc, I think I've also addressed your feedback? Is there anything else > to do other than wait for the spec to be published? Other than the couple of minor nits I mentioned in replies to the individual patches, this looks good to me. > Shall I post a v4 with PSCI v1.3 as default and the self-test? Would > you apply that into a branch ready for merging when the spec is ready, > or should I just wait and repost it all then? I think this can wait for the final spec. I assume that you are directly tracking this anyway, so we don't need to poll for the spec update. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 16:09:43 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <86frwiz1rs.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <248ec30e7b5c8a42d184f029c1cc9b664656b356.camel@infradead.org> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:17:58 +0000, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>] > On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 12:41 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 05:14:42PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 08:27 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote: > > > > If we're going down the route of having this PSCI call live in KVM, it > > > > really deserves a test. I think you can just pile on the existing > > > > psci_test selftest. > > > > > > Added to > > > https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/psci-hibernate > > > for next time. > > > > > > From 8c72a78e6179bc8970edc66a85ab6bee26f581fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> > > > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:07:46 +0000 > > > Subject: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> > > > > Looks good, thanks! > > Thanks. > > Marc, I think I've also addressed your feedback? Is there anything else > to do other than wait for the spec to be published? Other than the couple of minor nits I mentioned in replies to the individual patches, this looks good to me. > Shall I post a v4 with PSCI v1.3 as default and the self-test? Would > you apply that into a branch ready for merging when the spec is ready, > or should I just wait and repost it all then? I think this can wait for the final spec. I assume that you are directly tracking this anyway, so we don't need to poll for the spec update. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 16:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-19 12:59 [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] firmware/psci: Add definitions for PSCI v1.3 specification (ALPHA) David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: Add support for PSCI v1.2 and v1.3 David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 15:42 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-19 15:42 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-19 15:52 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 15:52 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:05 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 16:05 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 16:14 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:14 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 function for hibernation David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:06 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 16:06 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-19 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Pass through PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 call David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: Use SYSTEM_OFF2 PSCI call to power off for hibernate David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 12:59 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:02 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 16:02 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 16:12 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:12 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:37 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 16:37 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 16:55 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:55 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 17:08 ` Sudeep Holla 2024-03-22 17:08 ` Sudeep Holla 2024-03-22 17:05 ` Sudeep Holla 2024-03-22 17:05 ` Sudeep Holla 2024-03-19 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation Oliver Upton 2024-03-19 15:27 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-19 17:14 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 17:14 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-19 19:41 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-19 19:41 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-22 10:17 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 10:17 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 16:09 ` Marc Zyngier [this message] 2024-03-22 16:09 ` Marc Zyngier 2024-03-22 17:33 ` David Woodhouse 2024-03-22 17:33 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=86frwiz1rs.wl-maz@kernel.org \ --to=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \ --cc=james.morse@arm.com \ --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=len.brown@intel.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \ --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=smostafa@google.com \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.