All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com,
	tony@atomide.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] OMAP2+: GPIO: make workaround_enabled bank specific
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:39:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874o4ipfqw.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306247094-25372-9-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Tue, 24 May 2011 19:54:47 +0530")

Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:

> From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>
> Make workaround_enabled flag bank-specific instead of using a single
> flag for all the banks together. This would be helpful while making
> use of runtime framework in OMAP GPIO driver which would make the
> driver handle each GPIO bank independently.
>
> Also rename workaround_enabled flag to off_mode_wkup_wa_enabled

Do we even need a dedicated flag for this?

I seems that the combination of enabled_non_wakeup_gpios and whether or
not context has been lost could be used to check this condition.

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/15] OMAP2+: GPIO: make workaround_enabled bank specific
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:39:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874o4ipfqw.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306247094-25372-9-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Tue, 24 May 2011 19:54:47 +0530")

Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:

> From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>
> Make workaround_enabled flag bank-specific instead of using a single
> flag for all the banks together. This would be helpful while making
> use of runtime framework in OMAP GPIO driver which would make the
> driver handle each GPIO bank independently.
>
> Also rename workaround_enabled flag to off_mode_wkup_wa_enabled

Do we even need a dedicated flag for this?

I seems that the combination of enabled_non_wakeup_gpios and whether or
not context has been lost could be used to check this condition.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-25 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 14:24 [PATCH 00/15] OMAP: GPIO: Cleanup OMAP GPIO driver Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 01/15] OMAP: GPIO: Avoid cpu_is checks during module ena/disable Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 21:19   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 21:19     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:38     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:38       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 02/15] OMAP2PLUS: GPIO: Fix non-wakeup GPIO and rev_ids Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 21:34   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 21:34     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:38     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:38       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26 17:15       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26 17:15         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26 17:39         ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26 17:39           ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26 18:32           ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26 18:32             ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:23   ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26  9:23     ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26  9:43     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:43       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26 10:11     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-26 10:11       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-26 11:47       ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26 11:47         ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26 12:11         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-26 12:11           ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-26 12:38           ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26 12:38             ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26 12:46             ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-26 12:46               ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-26 13:19               ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26 13:19                 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26 13:38               ` B.J. Buchalter
2011-05-26 13:38                 ` B.J. Buchalter
2011-05-26 14:12                 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-26 14:12                   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 03/15] OMAP: GPIO: Remove dependency on gpio_bank_count Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 04/15] OMAP2PLUS: GPIO: Use flag to identify wkup dmn GPIO Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 21:40   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 21:40     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 05/15] OMAP: GPIO: Make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 21:41   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 21:41     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:58   ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26  9:58     ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26 10:07     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26 10:07       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:59   ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26  9:59     ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 06/15] OMAP4: GPIO: Save/restore context Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 21:43   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 21:43     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:37     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:37       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 07/15] OMAP: GPIO: handle save/restore ctx in GPIO driver Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 22:33   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 22:33     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 22:36     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 22:36       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 08/15] OMAP2+: GPIO: make workaround_enabled bank specific Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 22:39   ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-05-25 22:39     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:37     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:37       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 09/15] OMAP: GPIO: cleanup suspend and resume functions Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 22:57   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 22:57     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26 10:02     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26 10:02       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 10/15] OMAP: GPIO: cleanup prepare/resume idle functions Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 23:00   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 23:00     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 11/15] OMAP: GPIO: Remove hardcoded offsets in ctxt save/restore Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 23:01   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 23:01     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:36     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:36       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:42   ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26  9:42     ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-05-26  9:48     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:48       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 12/15] OMAP: GPIO: Fix: use wake set/clear regs Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 23:14   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 23:14     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:36     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:36       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 13/15] OMAP: GPIO: clean set_gpio_triggering function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 23:27   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 23:27     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26  9:55     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-26  9:55       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 14/15] OMAP: GPIO: Use memset for omap_gpio_reg_offs Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 23:30   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 23:30     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 15/15] OMAP: GPIO: clean omap_gpio_mod_init function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-24 14:24   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-05-25 23:48   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 23:48     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-03 11:20     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-06-03 11:20       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-06-03 14:31       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-03 14:31         ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874o4ipfqw.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=charu@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.