From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Edward Liaw <edliaw@google.com>,
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement check_timer_distribution()
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 00:00:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r1q882w.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240406151057.GB3060@redhat.com>
On Sat, Apr 06 2024 at 17:10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Yes, this changes the "semantics" of check_timer_distribution(), perhaps it
> should be renamed.
Definitely.
> But I do not see a better approach, and in fact I think that
>
> Test that all running threads _eventually_ receive CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID
>
> is the wrong goal.
>
> Do you agree?
No argument from my side. All we can test is that the leader is not
woken up.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-06 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-16 12:30 [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Marco Elver
2023-03-16 12:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests/timers/posix_timers: Test delivery of signals across threads Marco Elver
2023-04-16 7:04 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-06 20:53 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] " Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-06 21:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 21:32 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-03-30 10:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Marco Elver
2023-04-06 14:12 ` Marco Elver
2023-04-06 15:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-06 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-16 7:04 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " John Stultz
2024-04-02 9:07 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-02 14:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-02 17:23 ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 12:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-03 15:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 16:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 18:16 ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 19:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 19:35 ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 22:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 14:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-04 18:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-06 15:09 ` [PATCH] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement check_timer_distribution() Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 15:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-04-08 8:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-08 10:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08 10:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-08 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-08 22:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 11:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-09 11:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-09 12:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 13:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-09 15:57 ` [tip: timers/urgent] selftests/timers/posix_timers: Reimplement check_timer_distribution() tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-10 22:21 ` [PATCH v2] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement check_timer_distribution() John Stultz
2024-04-10 22:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 22:33 ` John Stultz
2024-04-11 12:41 ` [PATCH] " Mark Brown
2024-04-11 15:33 ` John Stultz
2024-04-11 12:44 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-11 14:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 15:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-11 16:03 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-12 12:35 ` [PATCH] selftests: fix build failure with NOLIBC Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-12 14:58 ` [tip: timers/urgent] selftests: kselftest: Fix " tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-14 7:42 ` [PATCH] selftests: fix " Mark Brown
2024-04-04 8:55 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-04 13:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-04 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 15:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-05 4:28 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878r1q882w.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=edliaw@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.