From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Julien Thierry <Julien.Thierry@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, mark.brown@arm.com, guohanjun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 42/47] ARM: add PROC_VTABLE and PROC_TABLE macros Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:46:26 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <888892dc104d817f590058687946b7f6078d328c.1564646727.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1564646727.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Commit e209950fdd065d2cc46e6338e47e52841b830cba upstream. Allow the way we access members of the processor vtable to be changed at compile time. We will need to move to per-CPU vtables to fix the Spectre variant 2 issues on big.Little systems. However, we have a couple of calls that do not need the vtable treatment, and indeed cause a kernel warning due to the (later) use of smp_processor_id(), so also introduce the PROC_TABLE macro for these which always use CPU 0's function pointers. Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h index 19939e88efca..a1a71b068edc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct mm_struct; /* * Don't change this structure - ASM code relies on it. */ -extern struct processor { +struct processor { /* MISC * get data abort address/flags */ @@ -79,9 +79,13 @@ extern struct processor { unsigned int suspend_size; void (*do_suspend)(void *); void (*do_resume)(void *); -} processor; +}; #ifndef MULTI_CPU +static inline void init_proc_vtable(const struct processor *p) +{ +} + extern void cpu_proc_init(void); extern void cpu_proc_fin(void); extern int cpu_do_idle(void); @@ -98,18 +102,27 @@ extern void cpu_reset(unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn)); extern void cpu_do_suspend(void *); extern void cpu_do_resume(void *); #else -#define cpu_proc_init processor._proc_init -#define cpu_check_bugs processor.check_bugs -#define cpu_proc_fin processor._proc_fin -#define cpu_reset processor.reset -#define cpu_do_idle processor._do_idle -#define cpu_dcache_clean_area processor.dcache_clean_area -#define cpu_set_pte_ext processor.set_pte_ext -#define cpu_do_switch_mm processor.switch_mm -/* These three are private to arch/arm/kernel/suspend.c */ -#define cpu_do_suspend processor.do_suspend -#define cpu_do_resume processor.do_resume +extern struct processor processor; +#define PROC_VTABLE(f) processor.f +#define PROC_TABLE(f) processor.f +static inline void init_proc_vtable(const struct processor *p) +{ + processor = *p; +} + +#define cpu_proc_init PROC_VTABLE(_proc_init) +#define cpu_check_bugs PROC_VTABLE(check_bugs) +#define cpu_proc_fin PROC_VTABLE(_proc_fin) +#define cpu_reset PROC_VTABLE(reset) +#define cpu_do_idle PROC_VTABLE(_do_idle) +#define cpu_dcache_clean_area PROC_TABLE(dcache_clean_area) +#define cpu_set_pte_ext PROC_TABLE(set_pte_ext) +#define cpu_do_switch_mm PROC_VTABLE(switch_mm) + +/* These two are private to arch/arm/kernel/suspend.c */ +#define cpu_do_suspend PROC_VTABLE(do_suspend) +#define cpu_do_resume PROC_VTABLE(do_resume) #endif extern void cpu_resume(void); diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c index 5aa9c08de410..13bda9574e18 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c @@ -625,9 +625,7 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void) cpu_name = list->cpu_name; __cpu_architecture = __get_cpu_architecture(); -#ifdef MULTI_CPU - processor = *list->proc; -#endif + init_proc_vtable(list->proc); #ifdef MULTI_TLB cpu_tlb = *list->tlb; #endif -- 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Julien Thierry <Julien.Thierry@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, guohanjun@huawei.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, mark.brown@arm.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 42/47] ARM: add PROC_VTABLE and PROC_TABLE macros Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:46:26 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <888892dc104d817f590058687946b7f6078d328c.1564646727.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1564646727.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Commit e209950fdd065d2cc46e6338e47e52841b830cba upstream. Allow the way we access members of the processor vtable to be changed at compile time. We will need to move to per-CPU vtables to fix the Spectre variant 2 issues on big.Little systems. However, we have a couple of calls that do not need the vtable treatment, and indeed cause a kernel warning due to the (later) use of smp_processor_id(), so also introduce the PROC_TABLE macro for these which always use CPU 0's function pointers. Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h index 19939e88efca..a1a71b068edc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct mm_struct; /* * Don't change this structure - ASM code relies on it. */ -extern struct processor { +struct processor { /* MISC * get data abort address/flags */ @@ -79,9 +79,13 @@ extern struct processor { unsigned int suspend_size; void (*do_suspend)(void *); void (*do_resume)(void *); -} processor; +}; #ifndef MULTI_CPU +static inline void init_proc_vtable(const struct processor *p) +{ +} + extern void cpu_proc_init(void); extern void cpu_proc_fin(void); extern int cpu_do_idle(void); @@ -98,18 +102,27 @@ extern void cpu_reset(unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn)); extern void cpu_do_suspend(void *); extern void cpu_do_resume(void *); #else -#define cpu_proc_init processor._proc_init -#define cpu_check_bugs processor.check_bugs -#define cpu_proc_fin processor._proc_fin -#define cpu_reset processor.reset -#define cpu_do_idle processor._do_idle -#define cpu_dcache_clean_area processor.dcache_clean_area -#define cpu_set_pte_ext processor.set_pte_ext -#define cpu_do_switch_mm processor.switch_mm -/* These three are private to arch/arm/kernel/suspend.c */ -#define cpu_do_suspend processor.do_suspend -#define cpu_do_resume processor.do_resume +extern struct processor processor; +#define PROC_VTABLE(f) processor.f +#define PROC_TABLE(f) processor.f +static inline void init_proc_vtable(const struct processor *p) +{ + processor = *p; +} + +#define cpu_proc_init PROC_VTABLE(_proc_init) +#define cpu_check_bugs PROC_VTABLE(check_bugs) +#define cpu_proc_fin PROC_VTABLE(_proc_fin) +#define cpu_reset PROC_VTABLE(reset) +#define cpu_do_idle PROC_VTABLE(_do_idle) +#define cpu_dcache_clean_area PROC_TABLE(dcache_clean_area) +#define cpu_set_pte_ext PROC_TABLE(set_pte_ext) +#define cpu_do_switch_mm PROC_VTABLE(switch_mm) + +/* These two are private to arch/arm/kernel/suspend.c */ +#define cpu_do_suspend PROC_VTABLE(do_suspend) +#define cpu_do_resume PROC_VTABLE(do_resume) #endif extern void cpu_resume(void); diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c index 5aa9c08de410..13bda9574e18 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c @@ -625,9 +625,7 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void) cpu_name = list->cpu_name; __cpu_architecture = __get_cpu_architecture(); -#ifdef MULTI_CPU - processor = *list->proc; -#endif + init_proc_vtable(list->proc); #ifdef MULTI_TLB cpu_tlb = *list->tlb; #endif -- 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 8:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-08-01 8:15 [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 00/47] V4.4 backport of arm32 Spectre patches Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 01/47] ARM: 8478/2: arm/arm64: add arm-smccc Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 02/47] arm/arm64: KVM: Advertise SMCCC v1.1 Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 03/47] arm64: KVM: Report SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 04/47] drivers/firmware: Expose psci_get_version through psci_ops structure Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 05/47] firmware/psci: Expose PSCI conduit Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 06/47] firmware/psci: Expose SMCCC version through psci_ops Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 07/47] arm/arm64: smccc: Make function identifiers an unsigned quantity Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 08/47] arm/arm64: smccc: Implement SMCCC v1.1 inline primitive Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 09/47] ARM: add more CPU part numbers for Cortex and Brahma B15 CPUs Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 10/47] ARM: bugs: prepare processor bug infrastructure Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 11/47] ARM: bugs: hook processor bug checking into SMP and suspend paths Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 12/47] ARM: bugs: add support for per-processor bug checking Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 13/47] ARM: spectre: add Kconfig symbol for CPUs vulnerable to Spectre Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 14/47] ARM: spectre-v2: harden branch predictor on context switches Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 15/47] ARM: spectre-v2: add Cortex A8 and A15 validation of the IBE bit Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 16/47] ARM: spectre-v2: harden user aborts in kernel space Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 17/47] ARM: spectre-v2: add firmware based hardening Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 18/47] ARM: spectre-v2: warn about incorrect context switching functions Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 19/47] ARM: spectre-v1: add speculation barrier (csdb) macros Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 20/47] ARM: spectre-v1: add array_index_mask_nospec() implementation Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 21/47] ARM: spectre-v1: fix syscall entry Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 22/47] ARM: signal: copy registers using __copy_from_user() Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 23/47] ARM: vfp: use __copy_from_user() when restoring VFP state Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 24/47] ARM: oabi-compat: copy semops using __copy_from_user() Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 25/47] ARM: use __inttype() in get_user() Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 26/47] ARM: spectre-v1: use get_user() for __get_user() Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 27/47] ARM: spectre-v1: mitigate user accesses Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 28/47] ARM: 8789/1: signal: copy registers using __copy_to_user() Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 29/47] ARM: 8791/1: vfp: use __copy_to_user() when saving VFP state Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 30/47] ARM: 8792/1: oabi-compat: copy oabi events using __copy_to_user() Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 31/47] ARM: 8793/1: signal: replace __put_user_error with __put_user Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 32/47] ARM: 8794/1: uaccess: Prevent speculative use of the current addr_limit Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 33/47] ARM: uaccess: remove put_user() code duplication Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 34/47] ARM: 8795/1: spectre-v1.1: use put_user() for __put_user() Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 35/47] ARM: 8796/1: spectre-v1,v1.1: provide helpers for address sanitization Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 35/47] ARM: 8796/1: spectre-v1, v1.1: " Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 36/47] ARM: 8797/1: spectre-v1.1: harden __copy_to_user Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 37/47] ARM: 8809/1: proc-v7: fix Thumb annotation of cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 38/47] ARM: 8810/1: vfp: Fix wrong assignement to ufp_exc Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 39/47] ARM: make lookup_processor_type() non-__init Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 40/47] ARM: split out processor lookup Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 41/47] ARM: clean up per-processor check_bugs method call Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar [this message] 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 42/47] ARM: add PROC_VTABLE and PROC_TABLE macros Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 43/47] arch: Introduce post-init read-only memory Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 44/47] ARM: 8595/2: apply more __ro_after_init Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 45/47] ARM: spectre-v2: per-CPU vtables to work around big.Little systems Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 46/47] ARM: ensure that processor vtables is not lost after boot Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 47/47] ARM: fix the cockup in the previous patch Viresh Kumar 2019-08-01 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-08-29 11:40 ` [PATCH ARM32 v4.4 V2 00/47] V4.4 backport of arm32 Spectre patches Viresh Kumar 2019-08-29 11:40 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-10-11 6:35 ` Viresh Kumar 2019-10-11 6:35 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=888892dc104d817f590058687946b7f6078d328c.1564646727.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=Julien.Thierry@arm.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=mark.brown@arm.com \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.