All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	cuigaosheng <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
	SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	gongruiqi1@huawei.com, wangweiyang2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 05:05:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdafoc_erHyfkby9X1LhkYgkBQsad=qNyXh+Tq_32zr_yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHgptq47g3mSPTKW9KMnqTH4K2Q7riBVwX4iA1V9YWYiA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:30 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 03:31, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:16 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > > I think for CPUs that can use LPAE, we want to eventually move to the 4G:4G
> > > memory model, which in turn depends on having the kernel in vmalloc space, as
> > > implemented by Linus Walleij in
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/log/?h=kernel-in-vmalloc-v5.14-rc1
> >
> > Yeah I'm still working on this series. The 4/4 split works pretty well,

Actually it's just kernel-in-vmalloc, 4/4 comes after that.

> > but it breaks KASan and I was in the process of fixing that when I left
> > for parental leave.
> >
> > The reason it breaks would be related to KASan not expecting
> > executable code in the vmalloc area, and since the shadowing
> > algorithm is a simple pointer offset, and since we go to lengths
> > to chisel shadow memory out of lowmem at a fixed offset from
> > TEXT_OFFSET, we have a problem.
> >
>
> Vmap'ed stacks actually has a similar problem, which is why it is
> disabled when KAsan is enabled. But this can be fixed by enabling arch
> support for KASAN_VMALLOC, and I suspect it may address the vmap'ed
> kernel as well.

Yep after seeing the other convo on the topic I realized that this
is indeed the same as I'm seeing. I can't disable KASAN just
because the kernel is in VMALLOC though, so I suppose when
I finally get back to this I have to fix KASAN_VMALLOC too
if noone beats me to it.

(It'd be great if someone could beat me to it...)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	cuigaosheng <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>,
	 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	 Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	 Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	 Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
	SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	gongruiqi1@huawei.com, wangweiyang2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 05:05:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdafoc_erHyfkby9X1LhkYgkBQsad=qNyXh+Tq_32zr_yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHgptq47g3mSPTKW9KMnqTH4K2Q7riBVwX4iA1V9YWYiA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:30 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 03:31, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:16 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > > I think for CPUs that can use LPAE, we want to eventually move to the 4G:4G
> > > memory model, which in turn depends on having the kernel in vmalloc space, as
> > > implemented by Linus Walleij in
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/log/?h=kernel-in-vmalloc-v5.14-rc1
> >
> > Yeah I'm still working on this series. The 4/4 split works pretty well,

Actually it's just kernel-in-vmalloc, 4/4 comes after that.

> > but it breaks KASan and I was in the process of fixing that when I left
> > for parental leave.
> >
> > The reason it breaks would be related to KASan not expecting
> > executable code in the vmalloc area, and since the shadowing
> > algorithm is a simple pointer offset, and since we go to lengths
> > to chisel shadow memory out of lowmem at a fixed offset from
> > TEXT_OFFSET, we have a problem.
> >
>
> Vmap'ed stacks actually has a similar problem, which is why it is
> disabled when KAsan is enabled. But this can be fixed by enabling arch
> support for KASAN_VMALLOC, and I suspect it may address the vmap'ed
> kernel as well.

Yep after seeing the other convo on the topic I realized that this
is indeed the same as I'm seeing. I can't disable KASAN just
because the kernel is in VMALLOC though, so I suppose when
I finally get back to this I have to fix KASAN_VMALLOC too
if noone beats me to it.

(It'd be great if someone could beat me to it...)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-24  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-18  8:58 [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18  8:58 ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18  8:58 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] arm-soc: exynos: replace open coded VA->PA conversions Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18  8:58   ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18  8:58 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] arm-soc: mvebu: replace open coded VA->PA conversion Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18  8:58   ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18  8:58 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] arm-soc: various: replace open coded VA->PA calculation Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18  8:58   ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-20 15:39 ` [PATCH -next 0/3] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-20 15:39   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-20 18:06   ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-20 18:06     ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-20 18:16     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-20 18:16       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-21  1:41   ` cuigaosheng
2021-12-21  1:41     ` cuigaosheng
2021-12-21  9:15     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-21  9:15       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-22  2:31       ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-22  2:31         ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-22  9:29         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-22  9:29           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-24  4:05           ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2021-12-24  4:05             ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdafoc_erHyfkby9X1LhkYgkBQsad=qNyXh+Tq_32zr_yg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangweiyang2@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.