From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
gongruiqi1@huawei.com, wangweiyang2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:39:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1-0u4VCCfgc7tjmnANM0yr7oUrQX2y-ZSVvZHDN191BQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211218085843.212497-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:58 AM Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> These patches replace an open coded calculation to obtain the physical
> address of a far symbol with a call to the new ldr_l etc macro, and they
> belong to the kaslr patch set of arm32.
>
> Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=arm-kaslr-latest
>
> Ard Biesheuvel (3):
> arm-soc: exynos: replace open coded VA->PA conversions
> arm-soc: mvebu: replace open coded VA->PA conversion
> arm-soc: various: replace open coded VA->PA calculation
Usually these patches should go through the respective platform
maintainer trees,
and from there into the soc tree, but time is a little short here.
I could apply them directly with the maintainer Acks, but I don't understand
the significance of you sending them now. Is something broken without the
three patches? Are these the only ones missing from Ard's original series,
or is this preparation? Would you expect the patches to get backported to
stable kernels?
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
gongruiqi1@huawei.com, wangweiyang2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:39:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1-0u4VCCfgc7tjmnANM0yr7oUrQX2y-ZSVvZHDN191BQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211218085843.212497-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:58 AM Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> These patches replace an open coded calculation to obtain the physical
> address of a far symbol with a call to the new ldr_l etc macro, and they
> belong to the kaslr patch set of arm32.
>
> Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=arm-kaslr-latest
>
> Ard Biesheuvel (3):
> arm-soc: exynos: replace open coded VA->PA conversions
> arm-soc: mvebu: replace open coded VA->PA conversion
> arm-soc: various: replace open coded VA->PA calculation
Usually these patches should go through the respective platform
maintainer trees,
and from there into the soc tree, but time is a little short here.
I could apply them directly with the maintainer Acks, but I don't understand
the significance of you sending them now. Is something broken without the
three patches? Are these the only ones missing from Ard's original series,
or is this preparation? Would you expect the patches to get backported to
stable kernels?
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-18 8:58 [PATCH -next 0/3] replace open coded VA->PA calculation Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18 8:58 ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18 8:58 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] arm-soc: exynos: replace open coded VA->PA conversions Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18 8:58 ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18 8:58 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] arm-soc: mvebu: replace open coded VA->PA conversion Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18 8:58 ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18 8:58 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] arm-soc: various: replace open coded VA->PA calculation Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-18 8:58 ` Gaosheng Cui
2021-12-20 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-12-20 15:39 ` [PATCH -next 0/3] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-20 18:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-20 18:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-20 18:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-20 18:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-21 1:41 ` cuigaosheng
2021-12-21 1:41 ` cuigaosheng
2021-12-21 9:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-21 9:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-22 2:31 ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-22 2:31 ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-22 9:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-22 9:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-24 4:05 ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-24 4:05 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a1-0u4VCCfgc7tjmnANM0yr7oUrQX2y-ZSVvZHDN191BQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
--cc=wangweiyang2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.