All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Brad Larson <brad@pensando.io>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] gpio: Add Elba SoC gpio driver for spi cs control
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:29:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbQD6p7fbGtuu1c92uXfSFDCTwqjqsXHpgnD5Lg4v0Okw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304034141.7062-2-brad@pensando.io>

Hi Brad,

thanks for your patch!

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:42 AM Brad Larson <brad@pensando.io> wrote:

> This GPIO driver is for the Pensando Elba SoC which
> provides control of four chip selects on two SPI busses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <brad@pensando.io>
(...)

> +#include <linux/gpio.h>

Use this in new drivers:
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>

> + * pin:             3            2        |       1            0
> + * bit:         7------6------5------4----|---3------2------1------0
> + *     cs1  cs1_ovr  cs0  cs0_ovr |  cs1  cs1_ovr  cs0  cs0_ovr
> + *                ssi1            |             ssi0
> + */
> +#define SPICS_PIN_SHIFT(pin)   (2 * (pin))
> +#define SPICS_MASK(pin)                (0x3 << SPICS_PIN_SHIFT(pin))
> +#define SPICS_SET(pin, val)    ((((val) << 1) | 0x1) << SPICS_PIN_SHIFT(pin))

So 2 bits per GPIO line in one register? (Nice doc!)

> +struct elba_spics_priv {
> +       void __iomem *base;
> +       spinlock_t lock;
> +       struct gpio_chip chip;
> +};
> +
> +static int elba_spics_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int pin)
> +{
> +       return -ENXIO;
> +}

Write a comment that the chip only supports output mode,
because it repurposes SPI CS pins as generic GPIO out,
maybe at the top of the file?

I suppose these systems also actually (ab)use the SPI cs
for things that are not really SPI CS? Because otherwise
this could just be part of the SPI driver (native chip select).

> +static const struct of_device_id ebla_spics_of_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "pensando,elba-spics" },

Have you documented this?

Other than that this is a nice and complete driver.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Brad Larson <brad@pensando.io>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	 Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	 "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] gpio: Add Elba SoC gpio driver for spi cs control
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:29:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbQD6p7fbGtuu1c92uXfSFDCTwqjqsXHpgnD5Lg4v0Okw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304034141.7062-2-brad@pensando.io>

Hi Brad,

thanks for your patch!

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:42 AM Brad Larson <brad@pensando.io> wrote:

> This GPIO driver is for the Pensando Elba SoC which
> provides control of four chip selects on two SPI busses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <brad@pensando.io>
(...)

> +#include <linux/gpio.h>

Use this in new drivers:
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>

> + * pin:             3            2        |       1            0
> + * bit:         7------6------5------4----|---3------2------1------0
> + *     cs1  cs1_ovr  cs0  cs0_ovr |  cs1  cs1_ovr  cs0  cs0_ovr
> + *                ssi1            |             ssi0
> + */
> +#define SPICS_PIN_SHIFT(pin)   (2 * (pin))
> +#define SPICS_MASK(pin)                (0x3 << SPICS_PIN_SHIFT(pin))
> +#define SPICS_SET(pin, val)    ((((val) << 1) | 0x1) << SPICS_PIN_SHIFT(pin))

So 2 bits per GPIO line in one register? (Nice doc!)

> +struct elba_spics_priv {
> +       void __iomem *base;
> +       spinlock_t lock;
> +       struct gpio_chip chip;
> +};
> +
> +static int elba_spics_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int pin)
> +{
> +       return -ENXIO;
> +}

Write a comment that the chip only supports output mode,
because it repurposes SPI CS pins as generic GPIO out,
maybe at the top of the file?

I suppose these systems also actually (ab)use the SPI cs
for things that are not really SPI CS? Because otherwise
this could just be part of the SPI driver (native chip select).

> +static const struct of_device_id ebla_spics_of_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "pensando,elba-spics" },

Have you documented this?

Other than that this is a nice and complete driver.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  3:41 [PATCH 0/8] Support Pensando Elba SoC Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41 ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] gpio: Add Elba SoC gpio driver for spi cs control Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  8:29   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2021-03-04  8:29     ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-04  9:10     ` Serge Semin
2021-03-04  9:10       ` Serge Semin
2021-03-04 13:38       ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-04 13:38         ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-23  1:05         ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:05           ` Brad Larson
2021-08-29 21:09           ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-29 21:09             ` Linus Walleij
2021-10-04 16:46             ` Brad Larson
2021-10-04 16:46               ` Brad Larson
2021-10-12 23:51               ` Linus Walleij
2021-10-12 23:51                 ` Linus Walleij
2021-10-14 20:06                 ` Brad Larson
2021-10-14 20:06                   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-30  2:44     ` Brad Larson
2021-03-30  2:44       ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:05     ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:05       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04 20:43   ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2021-03-04 20:43     ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2021-08-23  1:06     ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:06       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-05 11:25   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-03-05 11:25     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-23  1:07     ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:07       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-05 13:57   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-05 13:57     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-23  1:08     ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:08       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-07 19:21   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-07 19:21     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-29  1:19     ` Brad Larson
2021-03-29  1:19       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-29 10:39       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-29 10:39         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-23  1:13         ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:13           ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  7:50           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-23  7:50             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-23 16:30             ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23 16:30               ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23 20:11               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-23 20:11                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-04 17:14                 ` Brad Larson
2021-10-04 17:14                   ` Brad Larson
2021-10-04 17:16                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-04 17:16                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-23  1:10     ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:10       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add QSPI support for Pensando Elba SoC Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  9:29   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  9:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 3/8] spi: dw: Add support for Pensando Elba SoC SPI Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  6:44   ` Serge Semin
2021-03-04  6:44     ` Serge Semin
2021-08-23  1:17     ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  1:17       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  8:48   ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-04  8:48     ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-10  3:52     ` Brad Larson
2021-03-10  3:52       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] spidev: Add Pensando CPLD compatible Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  9:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  9:33     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 5/8] mmc: sdhci-cadence: Add Pensando Elba SoC support Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  9:41   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  9:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64: Add config for Pensando SoC platforms Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  9:42   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  9:42     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: Add Pensando Elba SoC support Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  8:03   ` Serge Semin
2021-03-04  8:03     ` Serge Semin
2021-03-29  1:07     ` Brad Larson
2021-03-29  1:07       ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  0:54     ` Brad Larson
2021-08-23  0:54       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  8:51   ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-04  8:51     ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-29  0:54     ` Brad Larson
2021-03-29  0:54       ` Brad Larson
2021-03-04  9:06   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04  9:06     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-04 20:47   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-04 20:47     ` Rob Herring
2021-03-05 11:22   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-03-05 11:22     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-03-04  3:41 ` [PATCH 8/8] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for PENSANDO Brad Larson
2021-03-04  3:41   ` Brad Larson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACRpkdbQD6p7fbGtuu1c92uXfSFDCTwqjqsXHpgnD5Lg4v0Okw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=brad@pensando.io \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.