All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: uniphier: change support card to simple-mfd from simple-bus
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:37:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATFUX56t=wn-3qOSYLwESp63gqDWjADEVQ1g1CYrGxA3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624181605.GJ954398@dell>

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:16 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:24 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > >
> > > > 'make ARCH=arm dtbs_check' emits the following warning:
> > > >
> > > >   support-card@1,1f00000: $nodename:0: 'support-card@1,1f00000' does not match '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
> > > >
> > > > Maybe, simple-mfd could be a better fit for this device.
> > >
> > > The two should be equivalent.
> >
> > Yes, I know.
> > That's why I can change "simple-bus" to "simple-mfd"
> > with no risk.
> >
> > The difference is schema-check.
> >
> > The node name for "simple-bus" is checked by 'make dtbs_check'.
> >
> > See this code:
> > https://github.com/robherring/dt-schema/blob/v2020.05/schemas/simple-bus.yaml#L17
> >
> > Even if I rename the node, it does not accept the
> > unit name '1,1f00000'
> >
> > > What do you mean by "maybe"?  Does this squash the warning?
> >
> > "maybe" means I am not quite sure
> > which compatible is a better fit
> > to describe this device.
> >
> > As mentioned above, simple-bus and simple-mfd
> > are interchangeable from a driver point of view.
> >
> > This add-on board is integrated with various peripherals
> > such as 16550a serial, smsc9115 ether etc.
> > The address-decode is implemented in a CPLD device.
> > It has chip selects and local addresses, which are mapped to
> > the parent.
> >
> > It can be either simple-bus or simple-mfd, I think.
> >
> >
> > dt-schema checks the node name of simple-bus.
> > Currently, there is no check for simple-mfd.
> >
> > So, I think this patch is an easy solution
> > to fix the warning.
>
> Yes, looking at the documentation it seems as though 'simple-mfd'
> would be a better fit.  Is the device a single IP with various
> different functions?


Not an IP.

This is a small board that consists of
a CPLD + ethernet controller + serial controller + LED, etc.


>
> > Rob is in Cc. Please add comments if any.
> >
> > > Isn't the issue caused by the ','?
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > The node name of simple-bus
> > must meet the regular expression:
> > "^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$"
> >
> >
> > Even if I rename the node
> > "support-card@1,1f00000"
> > to "bus@1,1f00000", the warning is still
> > displayed due to ','
> >
> > "1,1f00000" means
> > the address 0x01f00000 of chip select 1.
>
> Is this an officially accepted format?


I am not sure if it is official.

Rob said the data fields should be separated by commas.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg201565.html




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: uniphier: change support card to simple-mfd from simple-bus
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:37:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATFUX56t=wn-3qOSYLwESp63gqDWjADEVQ1g1CYrGxA3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624181605.GJ954398@dell>

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:16 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:24 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > >
> > > > 'make ARCH=arm dtbs_check' emits the following warning:
> > > >
> > > >   support-card@1,1f00000: $nodename:0: 'support-card@1,1f00000' does not match '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
> > > >
> > > > Maybe, simple-mfd could be a better fit for this device.
> > >
> > > The two should be equivalent.
> >
> > Yes, I know.
> > That's why I can change "simple-bus" to "simple-mfd"
> > with no risk.
> >
> > The difference is schema-check.
> >
> > The node name for "simple-bus" is checked by 'make dtbs_check'.
> >
> > See this code:
> > https://github.com/robherring/dt-schema/blob/v2020.05/schemas/simple-bus.yaml#L17
> >
> > Even if I rename the node, it does not accept the
> > unit name '1,1f00000'
> >
> > > What do you mean by "maybe"?  Does this squash the warning?
> >
> > "maybe" means I am not quite sure
> > which compatible is a better fit
> > to describe this device.
> >
> > As mentioned above, simple-bus and simple-mfd
> > are interchangeable from a driver point of view.
> >
> > This add-on board is integrated with various peripherals
> > such as 16550a serial, smsc9115 ether etc.
> > The address-decode is implemented in a CPLD device.
> > It has chip selects and local addresses, which are mapped to
> > the parent.
> >
> > It can be either simple-bus or simple-mfd, I think.
> >
> >
> > dt-schema checks the node name of simple-bus.
> > Currently, there is no check for simple-mfd.
> >
> > So, I think this patch is an easy solution
> > to fix the warning.
>
> Yes, looking at the documentation it seems as though 'simple-mfd'
> would be a better fit.  Is the device a single IP with various
> different functions?


Not an IP.

This is a small board that consists of
a CPLD + ethernet controller + serial controller + LED, etc.


>
> > Rob is in Cc. Please add comments if any.
> >
> > > Isn't the issue caused by the ','?
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > The node name of simple-bus
> > must meet the regular expression:
> > "^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$"
> >
> >
> > Even if I rename the node
> > "support-card@1,1f00000"
> > to "bus@1,1f00000", the warning is still
> > displayed due to ','
> >
> > "1,1f00000" means
> > the address 0x01f00000 of chip select 1.
>
> Is this an officially accepted format?


I am not sure if it is official.

Rob said the data fields should be separated by commas.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg201565.html




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-25 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23 11:46 [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: uniphier: add interrupts to support card serial Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-23 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: " Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-23 11:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: uniphier: rename support card serial node to fix schema warning Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-23 11:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: uniphier: change support card to simple-mfd from simple-bus Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-23 12:24   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-24 16:29     ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-24 16:29       ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-24 18:16       ` Lee Jones
2020-06-24 18:16         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-25 14:37         ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2020-06-25 14:37           ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-25 14:57           ` Lee Jones
2020-06-25 14:57             ` Lee Jones
2020-06-29  1:58             ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-29  1:58               ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-29  7:36               ` Lee Jones
2020-06-29  7:36                 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-29  7:43                 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-29  7:43                   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK7LNATFUX56t=wn-3qOSYLwESp63gqDWjADEVQ1g1CYrGxA3g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.