All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: tanzirh@google.com, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	 Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick DeSaulniers <nnn@google.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/string: shrink lib/string.i via IWYU
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:39:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdn=og6h5gVdDCjFDANs3MN-_CD4OZ9oRM=o9YAvoTzkzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231205132452.418722bea8f6878dca88142a@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:24 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:14:16 -0800 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > The preferred way to import bit-fiddling stuff is to include
> > > <linux/bits.h>.  Under the hood this may include asm/bitsperlong.h.  Or
> > > it may not, depending on Kconfig settings (particularly architecture).
> > >
> >
> > Just triple checking my understanding; it looks like
> > include/linux/bits.h unconditionally includes asm/bitsperlong.h (which
> > is implemented per arch) most of which seem to include
> > asm-generic/bitsperlong.h.
> >
> > include/linux/bits.h also defines a few macros (BIT_MASK, BIT_WORD,
> > BITS_PER_BYTE, GENMASK, etc).  If lib/string.c is not using any of
> > those, why can't we go straight to #including asm/bitsperlong.h?  That
> > should resolve to the arch specific impl which may include
> > asm-generic/bitsperlong.h?
>
> It's just a general rule.  If the higher-level include is present, use
> that.  Because of the above, plus I guess things might change in the
> future.

Hmm...how does one know that linux/bits.h is the higher-level include
of asm/bitsperlong.h?

Do we mention these conventions anywhere under Documentation?

>
> We've been getting better about irregular asm/include files.
>
> But bits.h is a poor example.  A better case to study is spinlock.h.
> If this tool recommended including asm/spinlock.h then that won't work
> on any architecture which doesn't implement SMP (there is no
> arch/nios2/include/asm/spinlock.h).

The tooling Tanzir is working on does wrap IWYU, and does support such
mapping (of 'low level' to 'high level' headers; more so, if it
recommends X you can override to suggest Y instead).

arch/nios/ also doesn't provide a bug.h, which this patch is
suggesting we include directly.  I guess the same goes for
asm/rwonce.h.

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-05 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-05 20:58 [PATCH] lib/string: shrink lib/string.i via IWYU tanzirh
2023-12-05 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-05 21:14   ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 21:24     ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-05 21:39       ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2023-12-05 21:43         ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 21:57           ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-11 20:47           ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-11 20:50             ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 21:53         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:05           ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-07  6:25         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-05 21:38 ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 21:51   ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 21:59     ` Greg KH
2023-12-05 22:14       ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 23:46         ` Greg KH
2023-12-06  0:55           ` Al Viro
2023-12-06  3:00             ` Al Viro
2023-12-06  3:09               ` Greg KH
2023-12-14 21:04                 ` Al Viro
2023-12-15 21:03                   ` Al Viro
2023-12-07 12:50         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:01     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:10       ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-05 22:25         ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 22:15       ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 22:20         ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 22:32         ` Al Viro
2023-12-07 12:52         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 21:57   ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 21:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-06  7:10 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-07 12:55   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKwvOdn=og6h5gVdDCjFDANs3MN-_CD4OZ9oRM=o9YAvoTzkzw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nnn@google.com \
    --cc=tanzirh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.