Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use device_get_match_data()

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use device_get_match_data()
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:04:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK22vWx1VPnrwEh+N-6vy5a7npFSW-=gp1uabTPSG2PpA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012092618.GF8314@google.com>

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 4:26 AM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:14 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Use preferred device_get_match_data() instead of of_match_device() to
> > > get the driver match data. With this, adjust the includes to explicitly
> > > include the correct headers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c           | 22 +++-------------------
> >
> > I'd keep the error message, but otherwise for axp20x,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >
> > >  drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c |  9 +++------
> > >  drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c        |  9 ++-------
> > >  drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c   |  6 ++++--
> > >  drivers/mfd/qcom_rpm.c         |  8 ++++----
> > >  drivers/mfd/tps65910.c         | 11 ++---------
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c    |  9 +++------
> > >  drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c      | 10 +++++-----
> > >  8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> FYI, this patch is not in my inbox.

There seems to be some issue with kernel.org delivering my mails. You
are not the only one. I thought it was just ones with large numbers of
recipients, but seems to be something else. Konstantin has been
looking into it. Do you see any pattern of mails you do receive from
me? Sent via google vs. kernel.org?

Rob