From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:09:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KBLX3rKs6q2SmKhMctRAKF71y0K3it5kTfR0xG5Qk8MLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1566903707-27536-2-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:02 PM Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> From: Alagu Sankar <alagusankar@silex-india.com>
>
> The existing implementation of initiating multiple sdio transfers for
> receive bundling is slowing down the receive speed. Combining the
> transfers using a bundle method would be ideal.
>
> The transmission utilization ratio for sdio bus for small packet is
> slow, because the space and time cost for sdio bus is same for large
> length packet and small length packet. So the speed of data for large
> length packet is higher than small length.
>
> Test result of different length of data:
> data packet(byte) cost time(us) calculated rate(Mbps)
> 256 28 73
> 512 33 124
> 1024 35 234
> 1792 45 318
> 14336 168 682
> 28672 333 688
> 57344 660 695
>
> Tested with QCA6174 SDIO with firmware
> WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00007-QCARMSWP-1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alagu Sankar <alagusankar@silex-india.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h | 7 ++-
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
> index 8ed4fbd..eacb4d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "sdio.h"
>
> +#define ATH10K_SDIO_DMA_BUF_SIZE (32 * 1024)
> +#define ATH10K_SDIO_VSG_BUF_SIZE (32 * 1024)
> +
> /* inlined helper functions */
>
> static inline int ath10k_sdio_calc_txrx_padded_len(struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio,
> @@ -381,16 +384,11 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packet(struct ath10k *ar,
> struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr = (struct ath10k_htc_hdr *)skb->data;
> bool trailer_present = htc_hdr->flags & ATH10K_HTC_FLAG_TRAILER_PRESENT;
> enum ath10k_htc_ep_id eid;
> - u16 payload_len;
> u8 *trailer;
> int ret;
>
> - payload_len = le16_to_cpu(htc_hdr->len);
> - skb->len = payload_len + sizeof(struct ath10k_htc_hdr);
> -
> if (trailer_present) {
> - trailer = skb->data + sizeof(*htc_hdr) +
> - payload_len - htc_hdr->trailer_len;
> + trailer = skb->data + skb->len - htc_hdr->trailer_len;
Oh, I see that you basiscally squashed in my patch, I don't think this
is ok, there is still value in mb description, and we probably want to
merge my patch to stable branches (even though sdio support is
incomplete in older releases).
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11116215/
I'm ok if you include my patch as part of your series, though, so can
you, instead, send a v3 with:
PATCH 1/8 : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11116215/
PATCH 2-8/8: This patch series
>
> eid = pipe_id_to_eid(htc_hdr->eid);
>
> @@ -489,11 +487,11 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packets(struct ath10k *ar,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_pkt_bundle(struct ath10k *ar,
> - struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *rx_pkts,
> - struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr,
> - size_t full_len, size_t act_len,
> - size_t *bndl_cnt)
> +static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_bundle(struct ath10k *ar,
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *rx_pkts,
> + struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr,
> + size_t full_len, size_t act_len,
> + size_t *bndl_cnt)
> {
> int ret, i;
>
> @@ -534,6 +532,7 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> size_t full_len, act_len;
> bool last_in_bundle;
> int ret, i;
> + int pkt_cnt = 0;
>
> if (n_lookaheads > ATH10K_SDIO_MAX_RX_MSGS) {
> ath10k_warn(ar,
> @@ -577,20 +576,22 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> */
> size_t bndl_cnt;
>
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_pkt_bundle(ar,
> - &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i],
> - htc_hdr,
> - full_len,
> - act_len,
> - &bndl_cnt);
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *rx_pkts =
Would rx_pkt be a better variable name? (since it's a one packet)
Also I'm not sure if you really need a new variable here, since you
only use rx_pkts once.
> + &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[pkt_cnt];
> +
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_bundle(ar,
> + rx_pkts,
> + htc_hdr,
> + full_len,
> + act_len,
> + &bndl_cnt);
>
> if (ret) {
> ath10k_warn(ar, "alloc_bundle error %d\n", ret);
> goto err;
> }
>
> - n_lookaheads += bndl_cnt;
> - i += bndl_cnt;
> + pkt_cnt += bndl_cnt;
> /*Next buffer will be the last in the bundle */
> last_in_bundle = true;
> }
> @@ -602,7 +603,7 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> if (htc_hdr->flags & ATH10K_HTC_FLAGS_RECV_1MORE_BLOCK)
> full_len += ATH10K_HIF_MBOX_BLOCK_SIZE;
>
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_rx_pkt(&ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i],
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_rx_pkt(&ar_sdio->rx_pkts[pkt_cnt],
> act_len,
> full_len,
> last_in_bundle,
> @@ -611,9 +612,10 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> ath10k_warn(ar, "alloc_rx_pkt error %d\n", ret);
> goto err;
> }
> + pkt_cnt++;
> }
>
> - ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = i;
> + ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = pkt_cnt;
>
> return 0;
>
> @@ -627,41 +629,78 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet(struct ath10k *ar,
> - struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *pkt)
> +static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio = ath10k_sdio_priv(ar);
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *pkt = &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[0];
> struct sk_buff *skb = pkt->skb;
> + struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr;
> int ret;
>
> ret = ath10k_sdio_readsb(ar, ar_sdio->mbox_info.htc_addr,
> skb->data, pkt->alloc_len);
> - pkt->status = ret;
> - if (!ret)
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = 0;
> + ath10k_sdio_mbox_free_rx_pkt(pkt);
> + } else {
> + htc_hdr = (struct ath10k_htc_hdr *)skb->data;
> + pkt->act_len = le16_to_cpu(htc_hdr->len) + sizeof(*htc_hdr);
> + pkt->status = ret;
> skb_put(skb, pkt->act_len);
> + }
I'd simplify:
if (ret) {
ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = 0;
ath10k_sdio_mbox_free_rx_pkt(pkt);
return ret;
}
....
pkt->status = 0;
return 0;
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(struct ath10k *ar)
> +static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch_bundle(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio = ath10k_sdio_priv(ar);
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *pkt;
> + struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr;
> int ret, i;
> + u32 pkt_offset, virt_pkt_len;
>
> + virt_pkt_len = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++) {
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet(ar,
> - &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i]);
> - if (ret)
> + virt_pkt_len += ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i].alloc_len;
> + }
> +
> + if (virt_pkt_len < ATH10K_SDIO_DMA_BUF_SIZE) {
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_readsb(ar, ar_sdio->mbox_info.htc_addr,
> + ar_sdio->vsg_buffer, virt_pkt_len);
> + if (ret) {
> + i = 0;
Why? You reset i to zero anyway in the goto label.
> goto err;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ath10k_err(ar, "size exceeding limit %d\n", virt_pkt_len);
> + }
> +
> + pkt_offset = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++) {
> + struct sk_buff *skb = ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i].skb;
> +
> + pkt = &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i];
> + htc_hdr = (struct ath10k_htc_hdr *)(ar_sdio->vsg_buffer + pkt_offset);
> + pkt->act_len = le16_to_cpu(htc_hdr->len) + sizeof(*htc_hdr);
> +
> + memcpy(skb->data, ar_sdio->vsg_buffer + pkt_offset,
> + pkt->act_len);
> + pkt->status = 0;
> + skb_put(skb, pkt->act_len);
> + pkt_offset += pkt->alloc_len;
> }
>
> return 0;
>
> err:
> /* Free all packets that was not successfully fetched. */
> - for (; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++)
> ath10k_sdio_mbox_free_rx_pkt(&ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i]);
>
> + ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = 0;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -704,7 +743,10 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rxmsg_pending_handler(struct ath10k *ar,
> */
> *done = false;
>
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(ar);
> + if (ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts > 1)
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch_bundle(ar);
> + else
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(ar);
>
> /* Process fetched packets. This will potentially update
> * n_lookaheads depending on if the packets contain lookahead
> @@ -1112,7 +1154,7 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_bmi_get_rx_lookahead(struct ath10k *ar)
> MBOX_HOST_INT_STATUS_ADDRESS,
> &rx_word);
> if (ret) {
> - ath10k_warn(ar, "unable to read RX_LOOKAHEAD_VALID: %d\n", ret);
> + ath10k_warn(ar, "unable to read rx_lookahd: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2007,6 +2049,12 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> goto err_core_destroy;
> }
>
> + ar_sdio->vsg_buffer = devm_kmalloc(ar->dev, ATH10K_SDIO_VSG_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ar_sdio->vsg_buffer) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_core_destroy;
> + }
> +
> ar_sdio->irq_data.irq_en_reg =
> devm_kzalloc(ar->dev, sizeof(struct ath10k_sdio_irq_enable_regs),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h
> index b8c7ac0..4896eca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h
> @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ struct ath10k_sdio_irq_proc_regs {
> u8 rx_lookahead_valid;
> u8 host_int_status2;
> u8 gmbox_rx_avail;
> - __le32 rx_lookahead[2];
> - __le32 rx_gmbox_lookahead_alias[2];
> + __le32 rx_lookahead[2 * ATH10K_HIF_MBOX_NUM_MAX];
> + __le32 int_status_enable;
> };
>
> struct ath10k_sdio_irq_enable_regs {
> @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ struct ath10k_sdio {
> struct ath10k *ar;
> struct ath10k_sdio_irq_data irq_data;
>
> + /* temporary buffer for sdio read */
> + u8 *vsg_buffer;
> +
> /* temporary buffer for BMI requests */
> u8 *bmi_buf;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:09:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KBLX3rKs6q2SmKhMctRAKF71y0K3it5kTfR0xG5Qk8MLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1566903707-27536-2-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:02 PM Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> From: Alagu Sankar <alagusankar@silex-india.com>
>
> The existing implementation of initiating multiple sdio transfers for
> receive bundling is slowing down the receive speed. Combining the
> transfers using a bundle method would be ideal.
>
> The transmission utilization ratio for sdio bus for small packet is
> slow, because the space and time cost for sdio bus is same for large
> length packet and small length packet. So the speed of data for large
> length packet is higher than small length.
>
> Test result of different length of data:
> data packet(byte) cost time(us) calculated rate(Mbps)
> 256 28 73
> 512 33 124
> 1024 35 234
> 1792 45 318
> 14336 168 682
> 28672 333 688
> 57344 660 695
>
> Tested with QCA6174 SDIO with firmware
> WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00007-QCARMSWP-1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alagu Sankar <alagusankar@silex-india.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h | 7 ++-
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
> index 8ed4fbd..eacb4d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "sdio.h"
>
> +#define ATH10K_SDIO_DMA_BUF_SIZE (32 * 1024)
> +#define ATH10K_SDIO_VSG_BUF_SIZE (32 * 1024)
> +
> /* inlined helper functions */
>
> static inline int ath10k_sdio_calc_txrx_padded_len(struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio,
> @@ -381,16 +384,11 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packet(struct ath10k *ar,
> struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr = (struct ath10k_htc_hdr *)skb->data;
> bool trailer_present = htc_hdr->flags & ATH10K_HTC_FLAG_TRAILER_PRESENT;
> enum ath10k_htc_ep_id eid;
> - u16 payload_len;
> u8 *trailer;
> int ret;
>
> - payload_len = le16_to_cpu(htc_hdr->len);
> - skb->len = payload_len + sizeof(struct ath10k_htc_hdr);
> -
> if (trailer_present) {
> - trailer = skb->data + sizeof(*htc_hdr) +
> - payload_len - htc_hdr->trailer_len;
> + trailer = skb->data + skb->len - htc_hdr->trailer_len;
Oh, I see that you basiscally squashed in my patch, I don't think this
is ok, there is still value in mb description, and we probably want to
merge my patch to stable branches (even though sdio support is
incomplete in older releases).
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11116215/
I'm ok if you include my patch as part of your series, though, so can
you, instead, send a v3 with:
PATCH 1/8 : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11116215/
PATCH 2-8/8: This patch series
>
> eid = pipe_id_to_eid(htc_hdr->eid);
>
> @@ -489,11 +487,11 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packets(struct ath10k *ar,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_pkt_bundle(struct ath10k *ar,
> - struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *rx_pkts,
> - struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr,
> - size_t full_len, size_t act_len,
> - size_t *bndl_cnt)
> +static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_bundle(struct ath10k *ar,
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *rx_pkts,
> + struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr,
> + size_t full_len, size_t act_len,
> + size_t *bndl_cnt)
> {
> int ret, i;
>
> @@ -534,6 +532,7 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> size_t full_len, act_len;
> bool last_in_bundle;
> int ret, i;
> + int pkt_cnt = 0;
>
> if (n_lookaheads > ATH10K_SDIO_MAX_RX_MSGS) {
> ath10k_warn(ar,
> @@ -577,20 +576,22 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> */
> size_t bndl_cnt;
>
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_pkt_bundle(ar,
> - &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i],
> - htc_hdr,
> - full_len,
> - act_len,
> - &bndl_cnt);
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *rx_pkts =
Would rx_pkt be a better variable name? (since it's a one packet)
Also I'm not sure if you really need a new variable here, since you
only use rx_pkts once.
> + &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[pkt_cnt];
> +
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_bundle(ar,
> + rx_pkts,
> + htc_hdr,
> + full_len,
> + act_len,
> + &bndl_cnt);
>
> if (ret) {
> ath10k_warn(ar, "alloc_bundle error %d\n", ret);
> goto err;
> }
>
> - n_lookaheads += bndl_cnt;
> - i += bndl_cnt;
> + pkt_cnt += bndl_cnt;
> /*Next buffer will be the last in the bundle */
> last_in_bundle = true;
> }
> @@ -602,7 +603,7 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> if (htc_hdr->flags & ATH10K_HTC_FLAGS_RECV_1MORE_BLOCK)
> full_len += ATH10K_HIF_MBOX_BLOCK_SIZE;
>
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_rx_pkt(&ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i],
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_alloc_rx_pkt(&ar_sdio->rx_pkts[pkt_cnt],
> act_len,
> full_len,
> last_in_bundle,
> @@ -611,9 +612,10 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> ath10k_warn(ar, "alloc_rx_pkt error %d\n", ret);
> goto err;
> }
> + pkt_cnt++;
> }
>
> - ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = i;
> + ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = pkt_cnt;
>
> return 0;
>
> @@ -627,41 +629,78 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_alloc(struct ath10k *ar,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet(struct ath10k *ar,
> - struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *pkt)
> +static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio = ath10k_sdio_priv(ar);
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *pkt = &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[0];
> struct sk_buff *skb = pkt->skb;
> + struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr;
> int ret;
>
> ret = ath10k_sdio_readsb(ar, ar_sdio->mbox_info.htc_addr,
> skb->data, pkt->alloc_len);
> - pkt->status = ret;
> - if (!ret)
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = 0;
> + ath10k_sdio_mbox_free_rx_pkt(pkt);
> + } else {
> + htc_hdr = (struct ath10k_htc_hdr *)skb->data;
> + pkt->act_len = le16_to_cpu(htc_hdr->len) + sizeof(*htc_hdr);
> + pkt->status = ret;
> skb_put(skb, pkt->act_len);
> + }
I'd simplify:
if (ret) {
ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = 0;
ath10k_sdio_mbox_free_rx_pkt(pkt);
return ret;
}
....
pkt->status = 0;
return 0;
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(struct ath10k *ar)
> +static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch_bundle(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio = ath10k_sdio_priv(ar);
> + struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data *pkt;
> + struct ath10k_htc_hdr *htc_hdr;
> int ret, i;
> + u32 pkt_offset, virt_pkt_len;
>
> + virt_pkt_len = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++) {
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_packet(ar,
> - &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i]);
> - if (ret)
> + virt_pkt_len += ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i].alloc_len;
> + }
> +
> + if (virt_pkt_len < ATH10K_SDIO_DMA_BUF_SIZE) {
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_readsb(ar, ar_sdio->mbox_info.htc_addr,
> + ar_sdio->vsg_buffer, virt_pkt_len);
> + if (ret) {
> + i = 0;
Why? You reset i to zero anyway in the goto label.
> goto err;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ath10k_err(ar, "size exceeding limit %d\n", virt_pkt_len);
> + }
> +
> + pkt_offset = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++) {
> + struct sk_buff *skb = ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i].skb;
> +
> + pkt = &ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i];
> + htc_hdr = (struct ath10k_htc_hdr *)(ar_sdio->vsg_buffer + pkt_offset);
> + pkt->act_len = le16_to_cpu(htc_hdr->len) + sizeof(*htc_hdr);
> +
> + memcpy(skb->data, ar_sdio->vsg_buffer + pkt_offset,
> + pkt->act_len);
> + pkt->status = 0;
> + skb_put(skb, pkt->act_len);
> + pkt_offset += pkt->alloc_len;
> }
>
> return 0;
>
> err:
> /* Free all packets that was not successfully fetched. */
> - for (; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts; i++)
> ath10k_sdio_mbox_free_rx_pkt(&ar_sdio->rx_pkts[i]);
>
> + ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts = 0;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -704,7 +743,10 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_rxmsg_pending_handler(struct ath10k *ar,
> */
> *done = false;
>
> - ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(ar);
> + if (ar_sdio->n_rx_pkts > 1)
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch_bundle(ar);
> + else
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_fetch(ar);
>
> /* Process fetched packets. This will potentially update
> * n_lookaheads depending on if the packets contain lookahead
> @@ -1112,7 +1154,7 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_bmi_get_rx_lookahead(struct ath10k *ar)
> MBOX_HOST_INT_STATUS_ADDRESS,
> &rx_word);
> if (ret) {
> - ath10k_warn(ar, "unable to read RX_LOOKAHEAD_VALID: %d\n", ret);
> + ath10k_warn(ar, "unable to read rx_lookahd: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2007,6 +2049,12 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> goto err_core_destroy;
> }
>
> + ar_sdio->vsg_buffer = devm_kmalloc(ar->dev, ATH10K_SDIO_VSG_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ar_sdio->vsg_buffer) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_core_destroy;
> + }
> +
> ar_sdio->irq_data.irq_en_reg =
> devm_kzalloc(ar->dev, sizeof(struct ath10k_sdio_irq_enable_regs),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h
> index b8c7ac0..4896eca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.h
> @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ struct ath10k_sdio_irq_proc_regs {
> u8 rx_lookahead_valid;
> u8 host_int_status2;
> u8 gmbox_rx_avail;
> - __le32 rx_lookahead[2];
> - __le32 rx_gmbox_lookahead_alias[2];
> + __le32 rx_lookahead[2 * ATH10K_HIF_MBOX_NUM_MAX];
> + __le32 int_status_enable;
> };
>
> struct ath10k_sdio_irq_enable_regs {
> @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ struct ath10k_sdio {
> struct ath10k *ar;
> struct ath10k_sdio_irq_data irq_data;
>
> + /* temporary buffer for sdio read */
> + u8 *vsg_buffer;
> +
> /* temporary buffer for BMI requests */
> u8 *bmi_buf;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-28 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-27 11:01 [PATCH v2 0/7] ath10k: improve throughout of tcp/udp TX/RX of sdio Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:23 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-27 11:23 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 4:28 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 4:28 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 5:09 ` Nicolas Boichat [this message]
2019-08-28 5:09 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-30 2:48 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:48 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 " Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 4:28 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 4:28 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 5:13 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 5:13 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-30 2:48 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:48 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 5:16 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 5:16 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-30 2:49 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:49 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] ath10k: disable TX complete indication of htt for sdio Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 4:29 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 4:29 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 5:27 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 5:27 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 12:59 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 12:59 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:50 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:50 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ath10k: add htt TX bundle " Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 5:36 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 5:36 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 13:03 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 13:03 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:51 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:51 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ath10k: enable alt data of TX path " Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 5:38 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 5:38 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-30 2:52 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:52 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ath10k: enable napi on RX " Wen Gong
2019-08-27 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-28 5:39 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-28 5:39 ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-08-30 2:52 ` Wen Gong
2019-08-30 2:52 ` Wen Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANMq1KBLX3rKs6q2SmKhMctRAKF71y0K3it5kTfR0xG5Qk8MLg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wgong@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.