From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:44:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJfjhNcDS_eHg-OUiGui-hyRL5iWQuu_U+BW_N9iSNbeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+yxcG=KBjG0A5BicBA7Zwu6LR6t=g5b-9EAPXA8_Dfm2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:17 AM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at the code, what's the point of this address != zc->address
> check? Should I just remove it?
No you must not remove it.
The test detects if a u64 ->unsigned long conversion might have truncated bits.
Quite surprisingly some people still use 32bit kernels.
The ABI is 64bit only, because we did not want to have yet another compat layer.
struct tcp_zerocopy_receive {
__u64 address; /* in: address of mapping */
__u32 length; /* in/out: number of bytes to map/mapped */
__u32 recv_skip_hint; /* out: amount of bytes to skip */
};
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: edumazet at google.com (Eric Dumazet)
Subject: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:44:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJfjhNcDS_eHg-OUiGui-hyRL5iWQuu_U+BW_N9iSNbeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+yxcG=KBjG0A5BicBA7Zwu6LR6t=g5b-9EAPXA8_Dfm2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:17 AM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl at google.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at the code, what's the point of this address != zc->address
> check? Should I just remove it?
No you must not remove it.
The test detects if a u64 ->unsigned long conversion might have truncated bits.
Quite surprisingly some people still use 32bit kernels.
The ABI is 64bit only, because we did not want to have yet another compat layer.
struct tcp_zerocopy_receive {
__u64 address; /* in: address of mapping */
__u32 length; /* in/out: number of bytes to map/mapped */
__u32 recv_skip_hint; /* out: amount of bytes to skip */
};
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: edumazet@google.com (Eric Dumazet)
Subject: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:44:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJfjhNcDS_eHg-OUiGui-hyRL5iWQuu_U+BW_N9iSNbeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190318144452.F6H8IsnQUiS8KK8U0H1FQw6mN7ml-TxJH8L8lqwfSIk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+yxcG=KBjG0A5BicBA7Zwu6LR6t=g5b-9EAPXA8_Dfm2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019@6:17 AM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at the code, what's the point of this address != zc->address
> check? Should I just remove it?
No you must not remove it.
The test detects if a u64 ->unsigned long conversion might have truncated bits.
Quite surprisingly some people still use 32bit kernels.
The ABI is 64bit only, because we did not want to have yet another compat layer.
struct tcp_zerocopy_receive {
__u64 address; /* in: address of mapping */
__u32 length; /* in/out: number of bytes to map/mapped */
__u32 recv_skip_hint; /* out: amount of bytes to skip */
};
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.o>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:44:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJfjhNcDS_eHg-OUiGui-hyRL5iWQuu_U+BW_N9iSNbeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+yxcG=KBjG0A5BicBA7Zwu6LR6t=g5b-9EAPXA8_Dfm2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:17 AM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at the code, what's the point of this address != zc->address
> check? Should I just remove it?
No you must not remove it.
The test detects if a u64 ->unsigned long conversion might have truncated bits.
Quite surprisingly some people still use 32bit kernels.
The ABI is 64bit only, because we did not want to have yet another compat layer.
struct tcp_zerocopy_receive {
__u64 address; /* in: address of mapping */
__u32 length; /* in/out: number of bytes to map/mapped */
__u32 recv_skip_hint; /* out: amount of bytes to skip */
};
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:44:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJfjhNcDS_eHg-OUiGui-hyRL5iWQuu_U+BW_N9iSNbeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+yxcG=KBjG0A5BicBA7Zwu6LR6t=g5b-9EAPXA8_Dfm2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:17 AM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at the code, what's the point of this address != zc->address
> check? Should I just remove it?
No you must not remove it.
The test detects if a u64 ->unsigned long conversion might have truncated bits.
Quite surprisingly some people still use 32bit kernels.
The ABI is 64bit only, because we did not want to have yet another compat layer.
struct tcp_zerocopy_receive {
__u64 address; /* in: address of mapping */
__u32 length; /* in/out: number of bytes to map/mapped */
__u32 recv_skip_hint; /* out: amount of bytes to skip */
};
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-18 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 224+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 19:51 [PATCH v11 00/14] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 11:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 11:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 11:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 11:33 ` kevin.brodsky
2019-03-18 11:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 20:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-15 20:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-15 20:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-15 20:03 ` eric.dumazet
2019-03-18 13:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:14 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 13:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:16 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 14:44 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2019-03-18 14:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-18 14:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-18 14:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-18 14:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-18 14:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-18 14:44 ` edumazet
2019-03-18 16:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:08 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 20:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm* Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-16 19:31 ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-16 19:31 ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-16 19:31 ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 11:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 11:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 11:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 11:47 ` kevin.brodsky
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:53 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 11:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-15 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-15 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-15 20:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-15 20:14 ` rostedt
2019-03-18 13:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 13:11 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] uprobes, arm64: untag user pointers in find_active_uprobe Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] bpf, arm64: untag user pointers in stack_map_get_build_id_offset Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] arm64: update Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 13:26 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 13:26 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 13:26 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-18 13:26 ` kevin.brodsky
2019-03-18 16:59 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:59 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:59 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:59 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:59 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:59 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-18 16:59 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 13:26 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-03-15 19:51 ` andreyknvl
2019-03-18 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64 relaxed ABI Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` vincenzo.frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] elf: Make AT_FLAGS arch configurable Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` vincenzo.frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Define Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` vincenzo.frascino
2019-03-22 6:22 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-22 6:22 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-22 6:22 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-22 6:22 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-22 6:22 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-22 6:22 ` amit.kachhap
2019-03-22 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-03-22 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-03-22 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-03-22 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-03-22 10:48 ` catalin.marinas
2019-03-22 15:52 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-22 15:52 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-22 15:52 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-22 15:52 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-03-22 15:52 ` kevin.brodsky
2019-04-03 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-04-03 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-04-03 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-04-03 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-04-03 16:50 ` catalin.marinas
2019-04-12 14:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-04-12 14:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-04-12 14:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-04-12 14:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2019-04-12 14:16 ` kevin.brodsky
2019-03-18 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Relax Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` vincenzo.frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: elf: Advertise relaxed ABI Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-03-18 16:35 ` vincenzo.frascino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANn89iJfjhNcDS_eHg-OUiGui-hyRL5iWQuu_U+BW_N9iSNbeA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Jacob.Bramley@arm.com \
--cc=Lee.Smith@arm.com \
--cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
--cc=Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.