From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:58:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFq0GLs2AMA+6b-Khf+4kGxzVCTvtehp-YmwV2h=_SP4=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0h7jvoa4oUeM4FgFizF_jbAonoAgP3m417n_TGqfqNsqg@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat
>> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I
>> have a plan for how to move forward.
>>
>> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided
>> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete
>> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes,
>> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily.
>>
>> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's
>> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8.
>
> I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I
> can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that?
Yes, please.
>
> As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the
> PSCI-related ones need ACKs.
For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more.
Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed.
Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack
from Daniel)
Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark.
Patch 9 and 10 needs acks.
Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes.
Kind regards
Uffe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ulf.hansson@linaro.org (Ulf Hansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:58:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFq0GLs2AMA+6b-Khf+4kGxzVCTvtehp-YmwV2h=_SP4=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0h7jvoa4oUeM4FgFizF_jbAonoAgP3m417n_TGqfqNsqg@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat
>> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I
>> have a plan for how to move forward.
>>
>> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided
>> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete
>> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes,
>> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily.
>>
>> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's
>> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8.
>
> I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I
> can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that?
Yes, please.
>
> As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the
> PSCI-related ones need ACKs.
For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more.
Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed.
Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack
from Daniel)
Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark.
Patch 9 and 10 needs acks.
Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes.
Kind regards
Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-04 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 14:38 [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] PM / Domains: Don't treat zero found compatible idle states as an error Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] PM / Domains: Deal with multiple states but no governor in genpd Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] PM / Domains: Document flags for genpd Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 13:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-04 13:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-04 14:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 14:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 16:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-04 16:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] dt: psci: Update DT bindings to support hierarchical PSCI states Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-11 14:44 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-11 14:44 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-11 16:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-11 16:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-12 9:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-12 9:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-12 10:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-12 10:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-12 10:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-12 10:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] of: base: Add of_get_cpu_state_node() to get idle states for a CPU node Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-11 15:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-11 15:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-11 16:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-11 16:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] cpuidle: dt: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Move psci to separate directory Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] MAINTAINERS: Update files for PSCI Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Simplify error path of psci_dt_init() Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 8:39 ` [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 8:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 8:58 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2018-10-04 8:58 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 9:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 9:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 9:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 9:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 10:10 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 10:10 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 15:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-04 15:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-04 17:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 17:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 17:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-04 17:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-04 18:36 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 18:36 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 18:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 18:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-05 10:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-05 10:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-05 11:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-05 11:49 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPDyKFq0GLs2AMA+6b-Khf+4kGxzVCTvtehp-YmwV2h=_SP4=g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.