From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrq5KQ7CHnMSCv7GqzpQyVfDQgLYjUVzeweTwKR3AmM4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMq1KA+3O+G+_r=xY98eK-in5i3HWg+4B4-ONk-6qWS3a9=0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 13:50, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:26 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > > ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> > > equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
> > >
> > > However, when there are multiple domains, as in MT8183 Bifrost
> > > GPU, we need to handle them in driver code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> >
> > Besides a minor nitpick, feel free to add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Uffe
> >
> > [snip]
> > > +static int panfrost_pm_domain_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> > > +{
> > > + int err;
> > > + int i, num_domains;
> > > +
> > > + num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(pfdev->dev->of_node,
> > > + "power-domains",
> > > + "#power-domain-cells");
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Single domain is handled by the core, and, if only a single power
> > > + * the power domain is requested, the property is optional.
> > > + */
> > > + if (num_domains < 2 && pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains < 2)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (num_domains != pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains) {
> > > + dev_err(pfdev->dev,
> > > + "Incorrect number of power domains: %d provided, %d needed\n",
> > > + num_domains, pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (WARN(num_domains > ARRAY_SIZE(pfdev->pm_domain_devs),
> > > + "Too many supplies in compatible structure.\n"))
> >
> > Nitpick:
> > Not sure this deserves a WARN. Perhaps a regular dev_err() is sufficient.
>
> Ah well I had a BUG_ON before so presumably this is already a little better ,-)
>
> You can only reach there if you set pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains >
> MAX_PM_DOMAINS in the currently matched struct panfrost_compatible
> (pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains == num_domains, and see below too), so
> the kernel code would actually be actually broken (not the device
> tree, nor anything that could be probed). So I'm wondering if the
> loudness of a WARN is better in this case? Arguable ,-)
I see. It's not a big a deal, so feel free to keep as is.
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrq5KQ7CHnMSCv7GqzpQyVfDQgLYjUVzeweTwKR3AmM4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMq1KA+3O+G+_r=xY98eK-in5i3HWg+4B4-ONk-6qWS3a9=0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 13:50, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:26 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > > ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> > > equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
> > >
> > > However, when there are multiple domains, as in MT8183 Bifrost
> > > GPU, we need to handle them in driver code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> >
> > Besides a minor nitpick, feel free to add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Uffe
> >
> > [snip]
> > > +static int panfrost_pm_domain_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> > > +{
> > > + int err;
> > > + int i, num_domains;
> > > +
> > > + num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(pfdev->dev->of_node,
> > > + "power-domains",
> > > + "#power-domain-cells");
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Single domain is handled by the core, and, if only a single power
> > > + * the power domain is requested, the property is optional.
> > > + */
> > > + if (num_domains < 2 && pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains < 2)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (num_domains != pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains) {
> > > + dev_err(pfdev->dev,
> > > + "Incorrect number of power domains: %d provided, %d needed\n",
> > > + num_domains, pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (WARN(num_domains > ARRAY_SIZE(pfdev->pm_domain_devs),
> > > + "Too many supplies in compatible structure.\n"))
> >
> > Nitpick:
> > Not sure this deserves a WARN. Perhaps a regular dev_err() is sufficient.
>
> Ah well I had a BUG_ON before so presumably this is already a little better ,-)
>
> You can only reach there if you set pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains >
> MAX_PM_DOMAINS in the currently matched struct panfrost_compatible
> (pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains == num_domains, and see below too), so
> the kernel code would actually be actually broken (not the device
> tree, nor anything that could be probed). So I'm wondering if the
> loudness of a WARN is better in this case? Arguable ,-)
I see. It's not a big a deal, so feel free to keep as is.
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrq5KQ7CHnMSCv7GqzpQyVfDQgLYjUVzeweTwKR3AmM4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMq1KA+3O+G+_r=xY98eK-in5i3HWg+4B4-ONk-6qWS3a9=0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 13:50, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:26 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > > ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> > > equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
> > >
> > > However, when there are multiple domains, as in MT8183 Bifrost
> > > GPU, we need to handle them in driver code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> >
> > Besides a minor nitpick, feel free to add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Uffe
> >
> > [snip]
> > > +static int panfrost_pm_domain_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> > > +{
> > > + int err;
> > > + int i, num_domains;
> > > +
> > > + num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(pfdev->dev->of_node,
> > > + "power-domains",
> > > + "#power-domain-cells");
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Single domain is handled by the core, and, if only a single power
> > > + * the power domain is requested, the property is optional.
> > > + */
> > > + if (num_domains < 2 && pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains < 2)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (num_domains != pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains) {
> > > + dev_err(pfdev->dev,
> > > + "Incorrect number of power domains: %d provided, %d needed\n",
> > > + num_domains, pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (WARN(num_domains > ARRAY_SIZE(pfdev->pm_domain_devs),
> > > + "Too many supplies in compatible structure.\n"))
> >
> > Nitpick:
> > Not sure this deserves a WARN. Perhaps a regular dev_err() is sufficient.
>
> Ah well I had a BUG_ON before so presumably this is already a little better ,-)
>
> You can only reach there if you set pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains >
> MAX_PM_DOMAINS in the currently matched struct panfrost_compatible
> (pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains == num_domains, and see below too), so
> the kernel code would actually be actually broken (not the device
> tree, nor anything that could be probed). So I'm wondering if the
> loudness of a WARN is better in this case? Arguable ,-)
I see. It's not a big a deal, so feel free to keep as is.
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrq5KQ7CHnMSCv7GqzpQyVfDQgLYjUVzeweTwKR3AmM4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMq1KA+3O+G+_r=xY98eK-in5i3HWg+4B4-ONk-6qWS3a9=0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 13:50, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:26 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will
> > > ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically
> > > equivalent to having not power domain specified at all).
> > >
> > > However, when there are multiple domains, as in MT8183 Bifrost
> > > GPU, we need to handle them in driver code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> >
> > Besides a minor nitpick, feel free to add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Uffe
> >
> > [snip]
> > > +static int panfrost_pm_domain_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> > > +{
> > > + int err;
> > > + int i, num_domains;
> > > +
> > > + num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(pfdev->dev->of_node,
> > > + "power-domains",
> > > + "#power-domain-cells");
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Single domain is handled by the core, and, if only a single power
> > > + * the power domain is requested, the property is optional.
> > > + */
> > > + if (num_domains < 2 && pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains < 2)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (num_domains != pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains) {
> > > + dev_err(pfdev->dev,
> > > + "Incorrect number of power domains: %d provided, %d needed\n",
> > > + num_domains, pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (WARN(num_domains > ARRAY_SIZE(pfdev->pm_domain_devs),
> > > + "Too many supplies in compatible structure.\n"))
> >
> > Nitpick:
> > Not sure this deserves a WARN. Perhaps a regular dev_err() is sufficient.
>
> Ah well I had a BUG_ON before so presumably this is already a little better ,-)
>
> You can only reach there if you set pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains >
> MAX_PM_DOMAINS in the currently matched struct panfrost_compatible
> (pfdev->comp->num_pm_domains == num_domains, and see below too), so
> the kernel code would actually be actually broken (not the device
> tree, nor anything that could be probed). So I'm wondering if the
> loudness of a WARN is better in this case? Arguable ,-)
I see. It's not a big a deal, so feel free to keep as is.
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 166+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 5:26 [PATCH v4 0/7] Add dts for mt8183 GPU (and misc panfrost patches) Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add Mediatek MT8183 Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-25 17:16 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-25 17:16 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-25 17:16 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-25 17:16 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-26 0:55 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-26 0:55 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-26 0:55 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-26 0:55 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-06 2:34 ` Nick Fan
2020-03-06 2:34 ` Nick Fan
2020-03-06 2:34 ` Nick Fan
2020-03-06 2:34 ` Nick Fan
2020-03-06 2:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-06 2:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-06 2:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-06 2:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-06 14:13 ` Rob Herring
2020-03-06 14:13 ` Rob Herring
2020-03-06 14:13 ` Rob Herring
2020-03-06 14:13 ` Rob Herring
2020-03-06 14:43 ` Steven Price
2020-03-06 14:43 ` Steven Price
2020-03-06 14:43 ` Steven Price
2020-03-06 14:43 ` Steven Price
2020-03-09 7:55 ` Nick Fan
2020-03-09 7:55 ` Nick Fan
2020-03-09 7:55 ` Nick Fan
2020-03-09 7:55 ` Nick Fan
2020-02-07 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: dts: mt8183: Add node for the Mali GPU Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] drm/panfrost: Improve error reporting in panfrost_gpu_power_on Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 10:38 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-02-12 10:38 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-02-12 10:38 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-02-12 10:38 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-02-07 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple regulators Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-10 11:31 ` Steven Price
2020-02-10 11:31 ` Steven Price
2020-02-10 11:31 ` Steven Price
2020-02-10 11:31 ` Steven Price
2020-02-10 14:00 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-10 14:00 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-10 14:00 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-10 14:00 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-07 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 13:52 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2020-02-07 13:52 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2020-02-07 13:52 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2020-02-07 13:52 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2020-02-09 12:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-09 12:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-09 12:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-09 12:43 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 14:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-07 14:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-07 14:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-07 14:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-09 12:50 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-09 12:50 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-09 12:50 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-09 12:50 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-10 7:50 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2020-02-10 7:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-10 7:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-10 7:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-10 11:39 ` Steven Price
2020-02-10 11:39 ` Steven Price
2020-02-10 11:39 ` Steven Price
2020-02-10 11:39 ` Steven Price
2020-02-11 19:43 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-11 19:43 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-11 19:43 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-11 19:43 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-11 20:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-11 20:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-11 20:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-11 20:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-12 1:58 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 1:58 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 1:58 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 1:58 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 2:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-12 2:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-12 2:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-12 2:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-02-12 2:08 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 2:08 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 2:08 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 2:08 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] RFC: drm/panfrost: Add mt8183-mali compatible string Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] RFC: drm/panfrost: devfreq: Add support for 2 regulators Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 8:49 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 8:49 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 8:49 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 8:49 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-12 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12 18:14 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 18:14 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 18:14 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 18:14 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-13 7:57 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-13 7:57 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-13 7:57 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-13 7:57 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-13 8:24 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-13 8:24 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-13 8:24 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-13 8:24 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-14 1:37 ` Nick Fan (范哲維)
2020-02-14 1:37 ` Nick Fan (范哲維)
2020-03-09 1:53 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-09 1:53 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-09 1:53 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-09 1:53 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 6:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Add dts for mt8183 GPU (and misc panfrost patches) Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-07 6:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-07 6:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-07 6:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-07 7:42 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 7:42 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 7:42 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 7:42 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-07 8:13 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-07 8:13 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-07 8:13 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-07 8:13 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-10 3:39 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-10 3:39 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-10 3:39 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-10 3:39 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-02-10 8:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-10 8:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-10 8:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-10 8:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2020-02-25 20:35 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-25 20:35 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-25 20:35 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-25 20:35 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPDyKFrq5KQ7CHnMSCv7GqzpQyVfDQgLYjUVzeweTwKR3AmM4g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.